Factors influencing awareness of healthcare providers on maternal sepsis: a mixed-methods approach

被引:8
|
作者
Brizuela, Vanessa [1 ]
Bonet, Mercedes [1 ]
Souza, Joao Paulo [2 ]
Tuncalp, Ozge [1 ]
Viswanath, Kasisomayajula [3 ,4 ]
Langer, Ana [5 ]
机构
[1] WHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, Dev & Res Training Human Reprod HRP, UNDP,UNFPA,UNICEF,World Bank Special Programme Re, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Dept Social Med, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth & Populat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Community Based Res, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Maternal sepsis; Awareness campaign; Knowledge; Enabling environment; Perception of disease; Multi-country study; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-6920-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundAn awareness campaign set to accompany the Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) was launched in 2017. In order to better develop and evaluate the campaign, we sought to understand the factors that influence awareness of maternal sepsis by exploring healthcare providers' knowledge, perception of enabling environments, and perception of severity of maternal sepsis.MethodsWe used a mixed-methods approach that included 13 semi-structured interviews to GLOSS regional and country coordinators and 1555 surveys of providers working in GLOSS participating facilities. Directed content analysis and grounded theory were used for qualitative analysis, based on a framework including four overarching themes around maternal health conditions, determinants of maternal health, barriers and facilitators to sepsis identification and management, plus 24 additional sub-topics that emerged during the interviews. Descriptive statistics for frequencies and percentages were used for the quantitative analysis; significance was tested using Pearson (2). Logistic regressions were performed to adjust for selected variables.ResultsAnalysis of interviews described limited availability of resources, poor quality of care, insufficient training and lack of protocols as some of the barriers to maternal sepsis identification and management. Analysis from the quantitative survey showed that while 92% of respondents had heard of maternal sepsis only 15% were able to correctly define it and 43% to correctly identify initial management. Provider confidence, perceived availability of resources and of a supportive environment were low (33%, 38%, and 48% respectively). Overall, the predictor that most explained awareness was training. Respondents from the survey and interviewees identified sepsis among the main conditions affecting women at their facilities.ConclusionsAwareness on maternal sepsis, while acknowledged as important, remains low. Healthcare providers need resources and support to feel confident about the correct identification and management of sepsis, as a prerequisite for the improvement of awareness of maternal sepsis. Similarly, providers need to know about maternal sepsis and its severity to understand the importance of reducing sepsis-related mortality and morbidity. Awareness raising campaigns can help bring neglected maternal health conditions, such as sepsis, to the forefront of global and local agendas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Mixed-Methods Study of Factors Influencing Access to and Use of Micronutrient Powders in Rwanda
    Dusingizimana, Theogene
    Weber, Janet L.
    Ramilan, Thiagarajah
    Iversen, Per Ole
    Brough, Louise
    GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (02): : 274 - 285
  • [32] A mixed-methods approach to identify factors influencing non-human primate genomic sequence data generation
    Hernandez, Margarita
    Perry, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2020, 171 : 119 - 119
  • [33] Asexuality: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Brotto, Lori A.
    Knudson, Gail
    Inskip, Jess
    Rhodes, Katherine
    Erskine, Yvonne
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 39 (03) : 599 - 618
  • [34] Preference and Influencing Factors of Advance Care Planning for Chinese Elderly Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Yang, Zhen
    Hou, Bailing
    Chen, Ping
    Zhang, Huijun
    JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2021, 23 (02) : 178 - 186
  • [35] Asexuality: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Lori A. Brotto
    Gail Knudson
    Jess Inskip
    Katherine Rhodes
    Yvonne Erskine
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2010, 39 : 599 - 618
  • [36] HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS' ATTITUDES, PRACTICE AND INFLUENCING FACTORS WITH REGARD TO CONSIDERING OLDER PERSONS' SPIRITUALITY DURING REHABILITATION: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Alshaaili, Nuha
    Foley, Mary J.
    Fox, Siobhan
    Timmons, Suzanne
    AGE AND AGEING, 2017, 46
  • [37] Psychosocial antecedents of knowledge sharing in healthcare research centers: a mixed-methods approach
    Goncalves, Tiago
    Curado, Carla
    Balle, Andrea Raymundo
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [38] Healthcare Providers' Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study
    Miyashita, Jun
    Kohno, Ayako
    Shimizu, Sayaka
    Kashiwazaki, Motohiro
    Kamihiro, Noriki
    Okawa, Kaoru
    Fujisaki, Masami
    Fukuhara, Shunichi
    Yamamoto, Yosuke
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (10) : 2935 - 2942
  • [39] Healthcare Providers and Caregivers' Perspectives on the Quality of Child Health Services in Urban Indonesia: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Setiawan, Agus
    Fitriyani, Poppy
    Istifada, Rizkiyani
    Shorey, Shefaly
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (15)
  • [40] Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study
    Jun Miyashita
    Ayako Kohno
    Sayaka Shimizu
    Motohiro Kashiwazaki
    Noriki Kamihiro
    Kaoru Okawa
    Masami Fujisaki
    Shunichi Fukuhara
    Yosuke Yamamoto
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 2935 - 2942