Factors influencing awareness of healthcare providers on maternal sepsis: a mixed-methods approach

被引:8
|
作者
Brizuela, Vanessa [1 ]
Bonet, Mercedes [1 ]
Souza, Joao Paulo [2 ]
Tuncalp, Ozge [1 ]
Viswanath, Kasisomayajula [3 ,4 ]
Langer, Ana [5 ]
机构
[1] WHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, Dev & Res Training Human Reprod HRP, UNDP,UNFPA,UNICEF,World Bank Special Programme Re, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Dept Social Med, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth & Populat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Community Based Res, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Maternal sepsis; Awareness campaign; Knowledge; Enabling environment; Perception of disease; Multi-country study; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-6920-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundAn awareness campaign set to accompany the Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) was launched in 2017. In order to better develop and evaluate the campaign, we sought to understand the factors that influence awareness of maternal sepsis by exploring healthcare providers' knowledge, perception of enabling environments, and perception of severity of maternal sepsis.MethodsWe used a mixed-methods approach that included 13 semi-structured interviews to GLOSS regional and country coordinators and 1555 surveys of providers working in GLOSS participating facilities. Directed content analysis and grounded theory were used for qualitative analysis, based on a framework including four overarching themes around maternal health conditions, determinants of maternal health, barriers and facilitators to sepsis identification and management, plus 24 additional sub-topics that emerged during the interviews. Descriptive statistics for frequencies and percentages were used for the quantitative analysis; significance was tested using Pearson (2). Logistic regressions were performed to adjust for selected variables.ResultsAnalysis of interviews described limited availability of resources, poor quality of care, insufficient training and lack of protocols as some of the barriers to maternal sepsis identification and management. Analysis from the quantitative survey showed that while 92% of respondents had heard of maternal sepsis only 15% were able to correctly define it and 43% to correctly identify initial management. Provider confidence, perceived availability of resources and of a supportive environment were low (33%, 38%, and 48% respectively). Overall, the predictor that most explained awareness was training. Respondents from the survey and interviewees identified sepsis among the main conditions affecting women at their facilities.ConclusionsAwareness on maternal sepsis, while acknowledged as important, remains low. Healthcare providers need resources and support to feel confident about the correct identification and management of sepsis, as a prerequisite for the improvement of awareness of maternal sepsis. Similarly, providers need to know about maternal sepsis and its severity to understand the importance of reducing sepsis-related mortality and morbidity. Awareness raising campaigns can help bring neglected maternal health conditions, such as sepsis, to the forefront of global and local agendas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] First-aid training for primary Healthcare providers on a remote Island: a mixed-methods study
    Thi, Ninh Do
    Thi, Giang Hoang
    Lee, Yoonjung
    Minh, Khue Pham
    Thanh, Hai Nguyen
    Shin, Jwa-Seop
    Xuan, Tuyen Luong
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [22] Educational Needs and Priorities of People with Diabetes and Healthcare Providers in South Korea: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Seo, Shinae
    Kim, Chun-Ja
    Kang, Hee Sun
    Schlenk, Elizabeth A.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSCULTURAL NURSING, 2025, 36 (02) : 195 - 204
  • [23] Effect of the Automatic Needle Destroyer on Healthcare Providers' Work in an Emergency Department: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Kim, Su Min
    Kim, Taerim
    Lee, Jee Hyang
    Cho, Sun Young
    Cha, Won Chul
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (02) : 123 - 131
  • [24] Complementary and Alternative Medicine Online Learning Intervention for Oncology Healthcare Providers: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Baydoun, Mohamad
    Levin, Gregory
    Balneaves, Lynda G.
    Oberoi, Devesh
    Sidhu, Aven
    Carlson, Linda E.
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2022, 21
  • [25] Determinants and perception of health insurance participation among healthcare providers in Nigeria: A mixed-methods study
    Shobiye, Hezekiah Olayinka
    Dada, Ibironke
    Ndili, Njide
    Zamba, Emmanuella
    Feeley, Frank
    de Wit, Tobias Rinke
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [26] Models of maternal and child healthcare for African refugees: protocol for an exploratory, mixed-methods study
    Njue, Carolyne
    Hayen, Andrew
    Dawson, Angela J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [27] Factors influencing use and perceptions of teledermatology: A mixed-methods study of 942 participants
    Choi, Ellie Ci-En
    Heng, Li Wei
    Tan, Sean Yilong
    Phan, Phillip
    Chandran, Nisha Suyien
    JAAD INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 6 : 97 - 103
  • [28] Factors influencing the implementation of the CombiConsultation in Dutch clinical practice: a mixed-methods study
    Meijvis, Valerie A. M.
    Heringa, Mette
    Kwint, Henk-Frans
    de Wit, Niek J.
    Bouvy, Marcel L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [29] Influencing Factors of Adherence Dynamics in Young Adults with Hypertension: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Jia, Yu
    Liao, Xiaoyang
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 22
  • [30] Usability factors influencing the continuance intention of disaster apps: A mixed-methods study
    Tan, Marion Lara
    Prasanna, Raj
    Stock, Kristin
    Doyle, Emma E. H.
    Leonard, Graham
    Johnston, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 50