Evaluation and Predicting PM10 Concentration Using Multiple Linear Regression and Machine Learning

被引:12
|
作者
Son, Sanghun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jinsoo [3 ]
机构
[1] Pukyong Natl Univ, Div Earth Environm Syst Sci, Busan, South Korea
[2] Pukyong Natl Univ, Spatial Informat Engn, Busan, South Korea
[3] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Spatial Informat Engn, Busan, South Korea
关键词
PM10; concentration; Meteorological Variables; Multiple Linear Regression; Support Vector Machine; Random Forest; PARTICULATE MATTER; PM2.5;
D O I
10.7780/kjrs.2020.36.6.3.7
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Particulate matter (PM) that has been artificially generated during the recent of rapid industrialization and urbanization moves and disperses according to weather conditions, and adversely affects the human skin and respiratory systems. The purpose of this study is to predict the PM10 concentration in Seoul using meteorological factors as input dataset for multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) models, and compared and evaluated the performance of the models. First, the PM10 concentration data obtained at 39 air quality monitoring sites (AQMS) in Seoul were divided into training and validation dataset (8:2 ratio). The nine meteorological factors (mean, maximum, and minimum temperature, precipitation, average and maximum wind speed, wind direction, yellow dust, and relative humidity), obtained by the automatic weather system (AWS), were composed to input dataset of models. The coefficients of determination (R-2) between the observed PM10 concentration and that predicted by the MLR, SVM, and RF models was 0.260, 0.772, and 0.793, respectively, and the RF model best predicted the PM10 concentration. Among the AQMS used for model validation, Gwanak-gu and Gangnam-daero AQMS are relatively close to AWS, and the SVM and RF models were highly accurate according to the model validations. The Jongno-gu AQMS is relatively far from the AWS, but since PM10 concentration for the two adjacent AQMS were used for model training, both models presented high accuracy. By contrast, Yongsan-gu AQMS was relatively far from AQMS and AWS, both models performed poorly.
引用
收藏
页码:1711 / 1720
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An hourly PM10 diagnosis model for the Bilbao metropolitan area using a linear regression methodology
    I. González-Aparicio
    J. Hidalgo
    A. Baklanov
    A. Padró
    O. Santa-Coloma
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20 : 4469 - 4483
  • [32] Performance of machine learning models to forecast PM10 levels
    Mampitiyaa, Lakindu
    Rathnayake, Namal
    Hoshinoc, Yukinobu
    Rathnayake, Upaka
    METHODSX, 2024, 12
  • [33] Machine Learning Techniques for PM10 Levels Forecast in Bogota
    Mejia Martinez, Nicolas
    Melissa Montes, Laura
    Mura, Ivan
    Felipe Franco, Juan
    2018 ICAI WORKSHOPS (ICAIW), 2018,
  • [34] An hourly PM10 diagnosis model for the Bilbao metropolitan area using a linear regression methodology
    Gonzalez-Aparicio, I.
    Hidalgo, J.
    Baklanov, A.
    Padro, A.
    Santa-Coloma, O.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2013, 20 (07) : 4469 - 4483
  • [35] PM10 Concentration Forecast Based on Wavelet Support Vector Machine
    Li, Yong
    Tao, Yan
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSING, DIAGNOSTICS, PROGNOSTICS, AND CONTROL (SDPC), 2017, : 383 - 386
  • [36] Predicting the water ecological criteria of copper using machine learning and multiple linear regression approaches.
    Yang, Xiao-Ling
    Wang, Meng-Xiao
    Li, Xiao-Juan
    Yuan, Ya-Wen
    Shao, Mei-Chen
    Mu, Yun-Song
    Bai, Ying-Chen
    Wu, Feng-Chang
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2024, 44 (07): : 3976 - 3985
  • [37] Analysis and prediction of PM10 concentration levels in Tunisia using statistical learning approaches
    Ben Ishak, Anis
    Moslah, Zaineb
    Trabelsi, Abdelwahed
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 23 (03) : 469 - 490
  • [38] Using support vector regression to predict PM10 and PM2.5
    Hou Weizhen
    Li Zhengqiang
    Zhang Yuhuan
    Xu Hua
    Zhang Ying
    Li Kaitao
    Li Donghui
    Wei Peng
    Ma Yan
    35TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT (ISRSE35), 2014, 17
  • [39] Forecasting PM10 Levels Using Machine Learning Models in the Arctic: A Comparative Study
    Fazzini, Paolo
    Montuori, Marco
    Pasini, Antonello
    Cuzzucoli, Alice
    Crotti, Ilaria
    Campana, Emilio Fortunato
    Petracchini, Francesco
    Dobricic, Srdjan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [40] Spatial hazard assessment of the PM10 using machine learning models in Barcelona, Spain
    Choubin, Bahram
    Abdolshahnejad, Mahsa
    Moradi, Ehsan
    Querol, Xavier
    Mosavi, Amir
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    Ghamisi, Pedram
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 701