Evaluation and Predicting PM10 Concentration Using Multiple Linear Regression and Machine Learning

被引:12
|
作者
Son, Sanghun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jinsoo [3 ]
机构
[1] Pukyong Natl Univ, Div Earth Environm Syst Sci, Busan, South Korea
[2] Pukyong Natl Univ, Spatial Informat Engn, Busan, South Korea
[3] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Spatial Informat Engn, Busan, South Korea
关键词
PM10; concentration; Meteorological Variables; Multiple Linear Regression; Support Vector Machine; Random Forest; PARTICULATE MATTER; PM2.5;
D O I
10.7780/kjrs.2020.36.6.3.7
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Particulate matter (PM) that has been artificially generated during the recent of rapid industrialization and urbanization moves and disperses according to weather conditions, and adversely affects the human skin and respiratory systems. The purpose of this study is to predict the PM10 concentration in Seoul using meteorological factors as input dataset for multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) models, and compared and evaluated the performance of the models. First, the PM10 concentration data obtained at 39 air quality monitoring sites (AQMS) in Seoul were divided into training and validation dataset (8:2 ratio). The nine meteorological factors (mean, maximum, and minimum temperature, precipitation, average and maximum wind speed, wind direction, yellow dust, and relative humidity), obtained by the automatic weather system (AWS), were composed to input dataset of models. The coefficients of determination (R-2) between the observed PM10 concentration and that predicted by the MLR, SVM, and RF models was 0.260, 0.772, and 0.793, respectively, and the RF model best predicted the PM10 concentration. Among the AQMS used for model validation, Gwanak-gu and Gangnam-daero AQMS are relatively close to AWS, and the SVM and RF models were highly accurate according to the model validations. The Jongno-gu AQMS is relatively far from the AWS, but since PM10 concentration for the two adjacent AQMS were used for model training, both models presented high accuracy. By contrast, Yongsan-gu AQMS was relatively far from AQMS and AWS, both models performed poorly.
引用
收藏
页码:1711 / 1720
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREDICTION OF PARTICULATE MATTER CONTENT PM10 WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK AND MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
    Stoyanov, N.
    Pandelova, A.
    Dzhudzhev, B.
    Georgiev, T. Z.
    Kalapchiiska, J.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 21 (06): : 5643 - 5655
  • [22] Multiple linear regression analysis of NOx and PM10 emissions from plasma cutting operations
    Edgehill, Richard U.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 240
  • [23] Estimation of PM10 and PM2.5 Using Backscatter Coefficient of Ceilometer and Machine Learning
    Kim, Bu-Yo
    Cha, Joo Wan
    Lee, Yong Hee
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (12)
  • [24] Prediction of PM10 using Support Vector Regression
    Arampongsanuwat, Soawalak
    Meesad, Phayung
    INFORMATION AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING, 2011, 6 : 120 - 124
  • [25] Forecasting PM10 Concentrations in the Caribbean Area Using Machine Learning Models
    Plocoste, Thomas
    Laventure, Sylvio
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [26] MODEL LINEAR REGRESSION MULTIPLE TO ESTIMATE CONCENTRATION OF PM
    Raul Morantes-Quintana, Giobertti, I
    Rincon-Polo, Gladys
    Andres Perez-Santodomingo, Narciso
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE CONTAMINACION AMBIENTAL, 2019, 35 (01): : 179 - 194
  • [27] Additive Calibration Model for the monitoring data of PM2.5 and PM10 based on ARIMA and Multiple Linear Regression
    Xu, Yan
    Lan, Shuangting
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT AND MODEL ENGINEERING (ICEMME 2019), 2019, : 302 - 306
  • [28] Predicting PM10 Concentrations Using Fuzzy Kriging
    Caha, Jan
    Marek, Lukas
    Dvorsky, Jiri
    HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (HAIS 2015), 2015, 9121 : 371 - 381
  • [29] Trends of the PM10 Concentrations and High PM10 Concentration Cases in Korea
    Yeo, Min Ju
    Kim, Yong Pyo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 35 (02) : 249 - 264
  • [30] FORECASTING PM10 CONCENTRATIONS BASED ON MACHINE AND DEEP LEARNING
    Isikdag, Umit
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2022, 31 (8A): : 8385 - 8391