Evaluation and Predicting PM10 Concentration Using Multiple Linear Regression and Machine Learning

被引:12
|
作者
Son, Sanghun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jinsoo [3 ]
机构
[1] Pukyong Natl Univ, Div Earth Environm Syst Sci, Busan, South Korea
[2] Pukyong Natl Univ, Spatial Informat Engn, Busan, South Korea
[3] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Spatial Informat Engn, Busan, South Korea
关键词
PM10; concentration; Meteorological Variables; Multiple Linear Regression; Support Vector Machine; Random Forest; PARTICULATE MATTER; PM2.5;
D O I
10.7780/kjrs.2020.36.6.3.7
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Particulate matter (PM) that has been artificially generated during the recent of rapid industrialization and urbanization moves and disperses according to weather conditions, and adversely affects the human skin and respiratory systems. The purpose of this study is to predict the PM10 concentration in Seoul using meteorological factors as input dataset for multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) models, and compared and evaluated the performance of the models. First, the PM10 concentration data obtained at 39 air quality monitoring sites (AQMS) in Seoul were divided into training and validation dataset (8:2 ratio). The nine meteorological factors (mean, maximum, and minimum temperature, precipitation, average and maximum wind speed, wind direction, yellow dust, and relative humidity), obtained by the automatic weather system (AWS), were composed to input dataset of models. The coefficients of determination (R-2) between the observed PM10 concentration and that predicted by the MLR, SVM, and RF models was 0.260, 0.772, and 0.793, respectively, and the RF model best predicted the PM10 concentration. Among the AQMS used for model validation, Gwanak-gu and Gangnam-daero AQMS are relatively close to AWS, and the SVM and RF models were highly accurate according to the model validations. The Jongno-gu AQMS is relatively far from the AWS, but since PM10 concentration for the two adjacent AQMS were used for model training, both models presented high accuracy. By contrast, Yongsan-gu AQMS was relatively far from AQMS and AWS, both models performed poorly.
引用
收藏
页码:1711 / 1720
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling PM2.5 and PM10 Using a Robust Simplified Linear Regression Machine Learning Algorithm
    Gregorio, Joao
    Gouveia-Caridade, Carla
    Caridade, Pedro J. S. B.
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (08)
  • [2] SHAP explanation of machine learning forecasting of PM10 concentration
    Ko, Byungjun
    Lee, Chaewon
    Kang, Taedong
    Choi, Ji Eun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2025, 38 (01) : 79 - 88
  • [3] Spatial prediction of PM10 concentration using machine learning algorithms in Ankara, Turkey
    Bozdag, Asli
    Dokuz, Yesim
    Gokcek, Oznur Begum
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 263 (263)
  • [4] Machine Learning Methods to Forecast the Concentration of PM10 in Lublin, Poland
    Kujawska, Justyna
    Kulisz, Monika
    Oleszczuk, Piotr
    Cel, Wojciech
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (17)
  • [5] Classification Prediction of PM10 Concentration Using a Tree-Based Machine Learning Approach
    Shaziayani, Wan Nur
    Ul-Saufie, Ahmad Zia
    Mutalib, Sofianita
    Noor, Norazian Mohamad
    Zainordin, Nazatul Syadia
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (04)
  • [6] Predicting PM10 and PM2.5 concentration in container ports: A deep learning approach
    Park, So -Young
    Woo, Su-Han
    Lim, Changwon
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 115
  • [7] Evaluating traditional versus ensemble machine learning methods for predicting missing data of daily PM10 concentration
    Kalantari, Elham
    Gholami, Hamid
    Malakooti, Hossein
    Eftekhari, Mahdi
    Saneei, Poorya
    Esfandiarpour, Donya
    Moosavi, Vahid
    Nafarzadegan, Ali Reza
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (05)
  • [8] An integrated feature selection and machine learning framework for PM10 concentration prediction
    Kalantari, Elham
    Gholami, Hamid
    Malakooti, Hossein
    Kaskaoutis, Dimitris G.
    Saneei, Poorya
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2025, 16 (05)
  • [9] Managing air quality: Predicting exceedances of legal limits for PM10 and O3 concentration using machine learning methods
    Krylova, Maryna
    Okhrin, Yarema
    ENVIRONMETRICS, 2022, 33 (02)
  • [10] PM10 forecasting using clusterwise regression
    Poggi, Jean-Michel
    Portier, Bruno
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (38) : 7005 - 7014