A Universal Transvaginal Cervical Length Screening Program for Preterm Birth Prevention

被引:74
|
作者
Orzechowski, Kelly M. [1 ]
Boelig, Rupsa C. [1 ]
Baxter, Jason K. [1 ]
Berghella, Vincenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2014年 / 124卷 / 03期
关键词
CONTROLLED-TRIAL; WOMEN; PROGESTERONE; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000000428
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a universal transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening program on the incidence of a cervical length 20 mm or less and adherence to the management protocol for a cervical length less than 25 mm. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of women with singleton gestations 18 0/7 to 23 6/7 weeks of gestation eligible for universal transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening over an 18-month period. Only women receiving antenatal care at our institution were included. Women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth and without delivery data available were excluded. A transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length of less than 25 mm was managed according to a predetermined protocol. Primary outcomes were the incidence of a cervical length 20 mm or less and adherence to the management protocol for a cervical length less than 25 mm. Secondary outcomes were the incidences of spontaneous preterm birth at less than 37, less than 34, or less than 32 weeks of gestation among women undergoing transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening compared with those not screened. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred sixty-nine of 2,171 (72.3%) eligible women underwent transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening. Overall, 17 (1.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.74) women had a cervical length 20 mm or less before 24 weeks of gestation. Management protocol deviations occurred in nine women with a cervical length less than 25 mm (43%, 95% CI 24.3-63.5). There was no difference in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth at less than 37 weeks of gestation (4.1 compared with 4.7%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.57-1.45), less than 34 weeks of gestation (1.5 compared with 1.3%, adjusted OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.52-2.74), or less than 32 weeks of gestation (0.8 compared with 0.8%, adjusted OR 0.0.76, 95% CI 0.26-2.25) among women receiving transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening compared with those not screened. CONCLUSION: In a universal transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening program, the incidence of a cervical length 20 mm or less was 1.1% in women with singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth. Protocol deviations occurred in 43% of women with a cervical length less than 25 mm. The incidence of spontaneous preterm birth was similar among women undergoing transvaginal cervical length screening compared with those not screened. LEVEL OF EVIEDENCE: II
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 525
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes and Characteristics of Women That Refuse Universal Transvaginal Cervical Length Screening
    Morgan, Elizabeth
    Ghosh, Priyanka
    Wakefield, Dorothy
    Kuhnly, Nicole
    Clark, Shealagh
    Figueroa, Reinaldo
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 : 153S - 153S
  • [32] Racial and ethnic disparities in universal cervical length screening with transvaginal ultrasound
    Haviland, Miriam J.
    Shainker, Scott A.
    Hacker, Michele R.
    Burris, Heather H.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (24): : 4078 - 4081
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without prior preterm birth: an update
    Hamel, Maureen
    Orzechowski, Kelly
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Thung, Stephen
    Werner, Erika
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S90 - S91
  • [34] Midtrimester transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening for spontaneous preterm birth in diamniotic twin pregnancies according to chorionicity
    Roman, Amanda
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Dude, Carolynn M.
    Ward, Andrew
    Anastasio, Hannah
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    Zullo, Fulvio
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 229 : 57 - 63
  • [35] Cost-effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without a prior preterm birth: an update
    Werner, Erika F.
    Hamel, Maureen S.
    Orzechowski, Kelly
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Thung, Stephen F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (04)
  • [36] Transabdominal cervical length screening in mid-pregnancy for preterm birth prevention: the impact of image quality on cervical length measurement
    Pedretti, M. K.
    Newnham, J. P.
    Dohery, D. A.
    Dickinson, J. E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 226 - 226
  • [37] Identifying the barriers to universal cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention at a tertiary hospital in Thailand (patient's perspectives): implementation research
    Chawanpaiboon, Saifon
    Titapant, Vitaya
    Anuwutnawin, Sanitra
    Kanjanapongporn, Attapol
    Pooliam, Julaporn
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (05) : 1179 - 1188
  • [38] Identifying the barriers to universal cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention at a tertiary hospital in Thailand (patient’s perspectives): implementation research
    Saifon Chawanpaiboon
    Vitaya Titapant
    Sanitra Anuwutnavin
    Attapol Kanjanapongporn
    Julaporn Pooliam
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 1179 - 1188
  • [39] Preterm Birth Prevention Post-Conization: A Model of Cervical Length Screening with Targeted Cerclage
    Kindinger, Lindsay M.
    Kyrgiou, Maria
    MacIntyre, David A.
    Cacciatore, Stefano
    Yulia, Angela
    Cook, Joanna
    Terzidou, Vasso
    Teoh, T. G.
    Bennett, Phillip R.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
  • [40] Transvaginal Sonographic Assessment Following Cervical Pessary Placement for Preterm Birth Prevention
    Schnettler, William
    Manoharan, Shwetha
    Smith, Kate
    AJP REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01): : E80 - E88