A Universal Transvaginal Cervical Length Screening Program for Preterm Birth Prevention

被引:74
|
作者
Orzechowski, Kelly M. [1 ]
Boelig, Rupsa C. [1 ]
Baxter, Jason K. [1 ]
Berghella, Vincenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2014年 / 124卷 / 03期
关键词
CONTROLLED-TRIAL; WOMEN; PROGESTERONE; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000000428
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a universal transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening program on the incidence of a cervical length 20 mm or less and adherence to the management protocol for a cervical length less than 25 mm. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of women with singleton gestations 18 0/7 to 23 6/7 weeks of gestation eligible for universal transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening over an 18-month period. Only women receiving antenatal care at our institution were included. Women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth and without delivery data available were excluded. A transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length of less than 25 mm was managed according to a predetermined protocol. Primary outcomes were the incidence of a cervical length 20 mm or less and adherence to the management protocol for a cervical length less than 25 mm. Secondary outcomes were the incidences of spontaneous preterm birth at less than 37, less than 34, or less than 32 weeks of gestation among women undergoing transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening compared with those not screened. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred sixty-nine of 2,171 (72.3%) eligible women underwent transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening. Overall, 17 (1.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.74) women had a cervical length 20 mm or less before 24 weeks of gestation. Management protocol deviations occurred in nine women with a cervical length less than 25 mm (43%, 95% CI 24.3-63.5). There was no difference in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth at less than 37 weeks of gestation (4.1 compared with 4.7%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.57-1.45), less than 34 weeks of gestation (1.5 compared with 1.3%, adjusted OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.52-2.74), or less than 32 weeks of gestation (0.8 compared with 0.8%, adjusted OR 0.0.76, 95% CI 0.26-2.25) among women receiving transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening compared with those not screened. CONCLUSION: In a universal transvaginal ultrasonogram cervical length screening program, the incidence of a cervical length 20 mm or less was 1.1% in women with singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth. Protocol deviations occurred in 43% of women with a cervical length less than 25 mm. The incidence of spontaneous preterm birth was similar among women undergoing transvaginal cervical length screening compared with those not screened. LEVEL OF EVIEDENCE: II
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 525
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Universal cervical length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Werner, Erika
    Han, Christina
    Pettker, Christian
    Buhimschi, Catalin
    Copel, Joshua
    Funai, Edmund
    Thung, Stephen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S174 - S174
  • [22] Universal transvaginal and transabdominal cervical length screening for short cervix
    Beamon, Carmen
    Stuebe, Alison
    Strauss, Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S160 - S161
  • [23] Decrease in the incidence of threatened preterm labor after implementation of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length universal screening
    Navathe, Reshama
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Villani, Michela
    Knapp, Jacquelyn
    Cruz, Yury
    Boelig, Rupsa
    Roman, Amanda
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (11): : 1853 - 1858
  • [24] Preterm birth prediction with transvaginal cervical length and uterocervical angle measurements
    Son, Moeun
    Butler, Sharlay K.
    Fay, Kathryn E.
    Grobman, William A.
    Miller, Emily S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S212 - S212
  • [25] The perceptions of obstetric care providers about cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention
    Pedretti, Michelle K.
    Doherty, Dorota A.
    Dickinson, Jan E.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 (05): : 650 - 657
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention
    Miller, Emily S.
    Grobman, William A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (06) : 546.e1 - 546.e6
  • [27] Identifying the Barriers to Universal Cervical Length Screening for Preterm Birth Prevention at a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand (Physician Perspectives): Implementation Research
    Chawanpaiboon, Saifon
    Titapant, Vitaya
    Anuwutnavin, Sanitra
    Kanjanapongporn, Attapol
    Pooliam, Julaporn
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (07)
  • [28] An implementation study of barriers to universal cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention at tertiary hospitals in Thailand: Healthcare managers' perspectives
    Titapant, Vitaya
    Chawanpaiboon, Saifon
    Anuwutnavin, Sanitra
    Kanjanapongporn, Attapol
    Pooliam, Julaporn
    Tangwiwat, Pimolphan
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION, 2022, 11 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [29] Universal Cervical-Length Screening to Prevent Preterm Birth: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Eke, Ahizechukwu C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (05): : 1178 - 1178
  • [30] Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Werner, E. F.
    Han, C. S.
    Pettker, C. M.
    Buhimschi, C. S.
    Copel, J. A.
    Funai, E. F.
    Thung, S. F.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 38 (01) : 32 - 37