Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

被引:5
|
作者
Sun, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Jian, Sha [2 ]
Peng, Bo [2 ]
Hou, Jian [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Clin Med, Shierqiao Campus, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Radiol, 39 Shierqiao Rd, Chengdu 610075, Peoples R China
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); computed tomography (CT); acute pancreatitis (AP); meta-analysis; FLUID COLLECTIONS; DIFFUSION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.21037/atm-22-812
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is characterized by acute onset, rapid development, and poor prognosis. Timely diagnosis and identification of the cause are the key to formulating the clinical program and improving the prognosis. There were several studies on this topic but the results varied. This study systematically evaluated and analyzed reports on the comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of AP in recent years, providing evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched for literature on MRI and CT in the diagnosis of AP After evaluating the artides and extracting the data, the software RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 9 articles were included in the selection, with a total of 566 patients having undergone diagnosis. Meta-analysis showed that for MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity was 92%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 85% to 96%; specificity was 74%, 95% CI: 50% to 89%; positive likelihood ratio was 3.5, 95% CI: 1.6 to 8.0; negative likelihood ratio was 0.11, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.24; diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 32, 95% CI: 7 to 136; and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90 to 0.95. For CT, the diagnostic sensitivity was 73%, 95% CI: 55% to 85%; specificity was 64%, 95% CI: 42% to 82%; positive likelihood ratio was 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.6; negative likelihood ratio was 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.76; DOR was 5, 95% CI: 2 to 14; and the AUC value was 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.78. The AUC value of MRI was significantly greater than CT (Z=3.684, P=0.023). Discussion: In the diagnosis of AP, MRI is more sensitive, specific, and accurate than CT, and can be used as the first choice for the diagnosis of AP.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging versus positron emission tomography-computed tomography for the staging of pediatric lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deeksha Bhalla
    Manisha Jana
    Devasenathipathy Kandasamy
    Pediatric Radiology, 2023, 53 : 2683 - 2691
  • [32] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for tumour staging of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gandhi, Niket
    Krishna, Satheesh
    Booth, Christopher M.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Flood, Trevor A.
    Morgan, Scott C.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    McGrath, Trevor A.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (05) : 744 - 753
  • [33] Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography for Triangular Fibrocartilaginous Complex Injury A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Smith, Toby O.
    Drew, Benjamin
    Toms, Andoni P.
    Jerosch-Herold, Christina
    Chojnowski, Adrian J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 94A (09): : 824 - 832
  • [34] Diagnostic test accuracy of imaging modalities for adults with acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ransome, William J.
    Dizon, Janine
    Guerrero, Katherine
    Chau, Minh
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2023, 54 (01) : 178 - 194
  • [35] Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Adenomyosis Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Review of Sonographic Diagnostic Criteria
    Liu, Linly
    Li, Wentao
    Leonardi, Mathew
    Condous, George
    Da Silva Costa, Fabricio
    Mol, Ben W.
    Wong, Lufee
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (11) : 2289 - 2306
  • [36] Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
    Uhlig, Johannes
    Uhlig, Annemarie
    Biggemann, Lorenz
    Fischer, Uwe
    Lotz, Joachim
    Wienbeck, Susanne
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 1194 - 1202
  • [37] Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for diabetes diagnosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Duong, Khanh N. C.
    Tan, Chia Jie
    Rattanasiri, Sasivimol
    Thakkinstian, Ammarin
    Anothaisintawee, Thunyarat
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [38] Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
    Johannes Uhlig
    Annemarie Uhlig
    Lorenz Biggemann
    Uwe Fischer
    Joachim Lotz
    Susanne Wienbeck
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1194 - 1202
  • [39] Performance comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in their diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shibin Hong
    Yiping Le
    Ka U. Lio
    Ting Zhang
    Yu Zhang
    Ning Zhang
    Insights into Imaging, 13
  • [40] Performance comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in their diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hong, Shibin
    Le, Yiping
    Lio, Ka U.
    Zhang, Ting
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhang, Ning
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2022, 13 (01)