Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

被引:5
|
作者
Sun, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Jian, Sha [2 ]
Peng, Bo [2 ]
Hou, Jian [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Clin Med, Shierqiao Campus, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Radiol, 39 Shierqiao Rd, Chengdu 610075, Peoples R China
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); computed tomography (CT); acute pancreatitis (AP); meta-analysis; FLUID COLLECTIONS; DIFFUSION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.21037/atm-22-812
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is characterized by acute onset, rapid development, and poor prognosis. Timely diagnosis and identification of the cause are the key to formulating the clinical program and improving the prognosis. There were several studies on this topic but the results varied. This study systematically evaluated and analyzed reports on the comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of AP in recent years, providing evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched for literature on MRI and CT in the diagnosis of AP After evaluating the artides and extracting the data, the software RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 9 articles were included in the selection, with a total of 566 patients having undergone diagnosis. Meta-analysis showed that for MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity was 92%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 85% to 96%; specificity was 74%, 95% CI: 50% to 89%; positive likelihood ratio was 3.5, 95% CI: 1.6 to 8.0; negative likelihood ratio was 0.11, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.24; diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 32, 95% CI: 7 to 136; and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90 to 0.95. For CT, the diagnostic sensitivity was 73%, 95% CI: 55% to 85%; specificity was 64%, 95% CI: 42% to 82%; positive likelihood ratio was 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.6; negative likelihood ratio was 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.76; DOR was 5, 95% CI: 2 to 14; and the AUC value was 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.78. The AUC value of MRI was significantly greater than CT (Z=3.684, P=0.023). Discussion: In the diagnosis of AP, MRI is more sensitive, specific, and accurate than CT, and can be used as the first choice for the diagnosis of AP.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review with network meta-analysis Diagnostic values of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ischemic stroke
    Zhang, Xiao-Hong
    Liang, Hui-Min
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (30)
  • [22] A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance and computed tomography enterography in the diagnosis of small intestinal tumors
    Li, Ruitao
    Ye, Shengqiang
    Zhou, Chenglong
    Liu, Feng
    Li, Xiaonan
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [23] Accuracy of diagnosis of salivary gland tumors with the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Ying
    Li, Jia
    Tan, Yi-ran
    Xiong, Ping
    Zhong, Lai-ping
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 119 (02): : 238 - +
  • [24] Tourniquet Test for Dengue Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    Reid, Hamish
    Thomas, Emma
    Foster, Charlie
    Darton, Thomas C.
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2016, 10 (08):
  • [25] Radiomics of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in renal cell carcinoma—a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stephan Ursprung
    Lucian Beer
    Annemarie Bruining
    Ramona Woitek
    Grant D Stewart
    Ferdia A Gallagher
    Evis Sala
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 3558 - 3566
  • [26] Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography to Exclude Pheochromocytoma: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Cost Analysis
    Buitenwerf, Edward
    Berends, Annika M. A.
    van Asselt, Antoinette D., I
    Korteweg, Tijmen
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    Veeger, Nic J. M.
    Links, Thera P.
    Dullaart, Robin P. F.
    Kerstens, Michiel N.
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 94 (10) : 2040 - 2052
  • [27] Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for sarcopenia diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fu, Hongbo
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Wenyi
    Lu, Jing
    Yang, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE, 2023, 14 : 57 - 70
  • [28] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
    Abialmouna, Omar
    Kalot, Mohamad
    Hamade, Mohamad
    Bahuva, Ronak
    Hasmi, Ariba
    Ahmed, Aamir
    Brumberger, Zachary
    Troy, Jordan
    Choaib, Ali
    Bharucha, Ronak
    Moyer, Ross
    Provost, Karin
    Page, Brian
    Sharma, Umesh
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 74 : 2436 - 2438
  • [29] Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic accuracy of staging in patients with cholangiocarcinoma A meta-analysis
    Huang, Xujian
    Yang, Jialin
    Li, Jingdong
    Xiong, Yongfu
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (35) : E20932
  • [30] Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging versus positron emission tomography-computed tomography for the staging of pediatric lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bhalla, Deeksha
    Jana, Manisha
    Kandasamy, Devasenathipathy
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 53 (13) : 2683 - 2691