Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative: Expanding Enrollment Suggests Potential for Large Impact

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Lena M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Meara, Ellen [5 ,6 ]
Birkmeyer, John D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Div Gen Med, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ctr Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
[6] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2015年 / 21卷 / 11期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
COST SAVINGS; ORGANIZATIONS; SURGERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Aiming to encourage care coordination and cost efficiency, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) launched the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative in 2013. To help gauge the program's potential impact and generalizability, we describe early and current participants. Study Design: We examined the cross-sectional association between BPCI participation and providers' structural and cost characteristics. Methods: Using data from October 2013 and June 2014, we quantified changes in BPCI participation. We described structural differences between participating and nonparticipating hospitals using t tests and chi(2) tests, and we used the Cochrane-Armitage test to assess whether participants were more likely be in higher 90-day episode cost quintiles than their peers at baseline (2009-2010). Results: Overall (risk-bearing and non-risk-bearing) participation in BPCI increased from about 400 in October 2013 to more than 2000 in June 2014-attributable, in part, to Model 2, the most comprehensive of the 4 models offered by CMMI for provider participation. Model 2 hospitals increasingly resemble eligible but nonparticipating hospitals. For the most commonly chosen condition of hip replacement, Model 2 hospitals were not costlier than their peers. Hospitals used to make up 97% of Model 2 participants, but physician practices now comprise a substantial number of Model 2 participants. However, most BPCI participants have not yet begun to bear financial risk. Risk-bearing Model 2 hospitals are a smaller and less representative group, with higher baseline costs for hip replacement than their peers. Conclusions: Growing participation in BPCI suggests strong interest in bundled payments. The long-term impact of BPCI will depend on CMMI's ability to persuade interested but non-risk-bearing participants to bear risk.
引用
收藏
页码:814 / 820
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative on Health Care Expenditure in Major Bowel Procedures
    Goldstone, Robert N.
    Zhang, Jianying
    Stafford, Caitlin
    Bordeianou, Liliana
    Kunitake, Hiroko
    Cauley, Christy E.
    Francone, Todd D.
    Ricciardi, Rocco
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (06) : 851 - 859
  • [42] Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD): A Sub-Group Analysis
    Smith-Nunez, A.
    Waltman, A.
    Chia, S.
    Smithson, A.
    Carey, K.
    Wan, W.
    White, S. R.
    Press, V. G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [43] Evaluation of pharmacist impact on a multidisciplinary transitions of care service in Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced model patients
    Butler, Tasha A.
    Heiman, Elise
    Bianco, Jessica
    Blanco, Delilah
    Carris, Nicholas W.
    Martinez, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 7 (01): : 15 - 24
  • [44] Early Effects of Medicare's Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Program for Lumbar Fusion
    Martin, Brook I.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Farrokhi, Farrokh R.
    McGuire, Kevin J.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (10) : 705 - 711
  • [45] Re: Large Variations in Medicare Payments for Surgery Highlight Savings Potential From Bundled Payment Programs Editorial Comment
    Penson, David F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (05): : 1796 - 1798
  • [46] IMPACT OF BUNDLED PAYMENT CARE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE ON HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURE IN MAJOR BOWEL PROCEDURES.
    Goldstone, R.
    Zhang, J.
    Stafford, C.
    Francone, T.
    Kunitake, H.
    Bordeianou, L.
    Cauley, C.
    Ricciardi, R.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (06) : E95 - E95
  • [47] Lack of Cost Savings for Lumbar Spine Fusions After Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative A Consequence of Increased Case Complexity
    Bronson, Wesley H.
    Kingery, Matthew T.
    Hutzler, Lorraine
    Karia, Raj
    Errico, Thomas
    Bosco, Joseph
    Bendo, John A.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (04) : 298 - 304
  • [48] Point of View: Early Effects of Medicare's Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Program for Lumbar Fusion
    Carey, Timothy S.
    DeWalt, Darren
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (10) : 712 - 712
  • [49] Comparison of Payment Margins Between the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative and the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model Shows a Marked Reduction for a Successful Program
    Padilla, Jorge A.
    Gabor, Jonathan A.
    Kalkut, Gary E.
    Pazand, Lily
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    Macaulay, William
    Bosco, Joseph A.
    Slover, James D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (21): : 1948 - 1954
  • [50] Early Results of Medicare's Bundled Payment Initiative for a 90-Day Total Joint Arthroplasty Episode of Care
    Iorio, Richard
    Clair, Andrew J.
    Inneh, Ifeoma A.
    Slover, James D.
    Bosco, Joseph A.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (02): : 343 - 350