Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative: Expanding Enrollment Suggests Potential for Large Impact

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Lena M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Meara, Ellen [5 ,6 ]
Birkmeyer, John D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Div Gen Med, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ctr Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
[6] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2015年 / 21卷 / 11期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
COST SAVINGS; ORGANIZATIONS; SURGERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Aiming to encourage care coordination and cost efficiency, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) launched the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative in 2013. To help gauge the program's potential impact and generalizability, we describe early and current participants. Study Design: We examined the cross-sectional association between BPCI participation and providers' structural and cost characteristics. Methods: Using data from October 2013 and June 2014, we quantified changes in BPCI participation. We described structural differences between participating and nonparticipating hospitals using t tests and chi(2) tests, and we used the Cochrane-Armitage test to assess whether participants were more likely be in higher 90-day episode cost quintiles than their peers at baseline (2009-2010). Results: Overall (risk-bearing and non-risk-bearing) participation in BPCI increased from about 400 in October 2013 to more than 2000 in June 2014-attributable, in part, to Model 2, the most comprehensive of the 4 models offered by CMMI for provider participation. Model 2 hospitals increasingly resemble eligible but nonparticipating hospitals. For the most commonly chosen condition of hip replacement, Model 2 hospitals were not costlier than their peers. Hospitals used to make up 97% of Model 2 participants, but physician practices now comprise a substantial number of Model 2 participants. However, most BPCI participants have not yet begun to bear financial risk. Risk-bearing Model 2 hospitals are a smaller and less representative group, with higher baseline costs for hip replacement than their peers. Conclusions: Growing participation in BPCI suggests strong interest in bundled payments. The long-term impact of BPCI will depend on CMMI's ability to persuade interested but non-risk-bearing participants to bear risk.
引用
收藏
页码:814 / 820
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Re: Participation and Dropout in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative Editorial Comment
    Resnick, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (04): : 690 - 690
  • [22] WHAT ARE THE COST DRIVERS FOR THE MAJOR BOWEL BUNDLED PAYMENTS FOR CARE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE?
    Ricciardi, R.
    Moucharite, M.
    Stafford, C.
    Roberts, P. L.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (05) : E173 - E173
  • [23] Early Experience with the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative for Major Bowel Operation
    Sibia, Udai S.
    Klune, John
    Bilchik, Anton J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S75 - S75
  • [24] Association of Hospital Participation in Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced With Medicare Spending and Hospital Incentive Payments
    Shashikumar, Sukruth A.
    Gulseren, Baris
    Berlin, Nicholas L.
    Hollingsworth, John M.
    Joynt Maddox, Karen E.
    Ryan, Andrew M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (16): : 1616 - 1623
  • [25] Impact of Medicare's Bundled Payments Initiative on Patient Selection, Payments, and Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    McNeely, Christian
    Orav, E. John
    Zheng, Jie
    Joynt Maddox, Karen E.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2020, 13 (09): : 669 - 678
  • [26] Savings and outcomes under Medicare's bundled payments initiative for skilled nursing facilities
    Joynt Maddox, Karen E.
    Barnett, Michael L.
    Orav, E. John
    Zheng, Jie
    Grabowski, David C.
    Epstein, Arnold M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 (12) : 3422 - 3434
  • [27] Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Readmissions: A Negative Study That Has Positive Implications
    Ohar, Jill A.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2017, 14 (05) : 617 - 618
  • [28] COSTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF DIALYSIS RELATED INFECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE BUNDLED PAYMENTS FOR CARE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE
    Queeley, G. L.
    Campbell, E. S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A44 - A44
  • [29] Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative: The Next Evolution of Payment Formulations AAHKS Bundled Payment Task Force
    Froimson, Mark I.
    Rana, Adam
    White, Richard E., Jr.
    Marshall, Amanda
    Schutzer, Steve F.
    Healy, William L.
    Naas, Peggy
    Daubert, Gail
    Iorio, Richard
    Parsley, Brian
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (08): : 157 - 165
  • [30] Target Price Adjustment for Hip Fractures Is Not Sufficient in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative
    Skibicki, Hope
    Yayac, Michael
    Krueger, Chad A.
    Courtney, P. Maxwell
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (01): : 47 - 53