Analysis of prostate intensity- and volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy planning quality with PlanIQTM

被引:14
|
作者
Sasaki, Motoharu [1 ]
Nakaguuchi, Yuji [2 ]
Kamomae, Takeshi [3 ]
Tsuzuki, Akira [4 ]
Kobuchi, Satoshi [5 ]
Kuwahara, Kenmei [5 ]
Ueda, Shoji [6 ]
Endo, Yuto [6 ]
Ikushima, Hitoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ, Grad Sch, Inst Biomed Sci, Tokushima, Japan
[2] Toyo Medic Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[4] Kochi Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol Technol, Kochi, Japan
[5] Tokushima Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, Tokushima, Japan
[6] Tokushima Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Tokushima, Japan
来源
关键词
Feasibility DVHTM; IMRT; PlanIQ(TM); Prostate cancer; VMAT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13233
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of treatment planning using the PlanIQ(TM) software and to investigate whether it is possible to improve the quality of treatment planning using the "Feasibility dose-volume histogram (DVH)(TM)" implemented in the PlanIQ(TM) software. Methods Using the PlanIQ(TM) software, we retrospectively analyzed the learning curve regarding the quality of the treatment plans for 148 patients of prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated radiation therapy performed at our institution over the past eight years. We also sought to examine the possibility of improving treatment planning quality by re-planning in 47 patients where the quality of the target dose and the dose limits for organs at risk (OARs) were inadequate. The re-planning treatment plans referred to the Feasibility DVHTM implemented in the PlanIQ(TM) software and modified the treatment planning system based on the target dose and OAR constraints. Results Analysis of the learning curve of the treatment plans quality using PlanIQ(TM) software retrospectively showed a trend of improvement in the treatment plan quality from year to year. The improvement in the treatment plans quality was more influenced by dose reduction in the OARs than by target coverage. In all cases where re-planning was performed, the improvement in the treatment plan's quality resulted in a better treatment plan than the one adopted for delivery to patients in the clinical plan. Conclusions The PlanIQ(TM) provided insights into the quality of the treatment plans at our institution and identified problems and areas for improvement in the treatment plans, allowing for the development of appropriate treatment plans for specific patients.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 142
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving plan quality for prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Wright, Katrina
    Ferrari-Anderson, Janet
    Barry, Tamara
    Bernard, Anne
    Brown, Elizabeth
    Lehman, Margot
    Pryor, David
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (04) : 348 - 356
  • [2] A Retrospective Planning Analysis Comparing Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Radiotherapy Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Elith, Craig A.
    Cao, Fred
    Dempsey, Shane E.
    Findlay, Naomi
    Warren-Forward, Helen
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2013, 44 (02) : 79 - 86
  • [3] Dosimetric analysis of testicular doses in prostate intensity-modulated and volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy at different energy levels
    Onal, Cem
    ArsIan, Gungor
    Dolek, Yemliha
    Efe, Esma
    Medical Dosimetry, 2016, 41 (04) : 310 - 314
  • [4] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Zhen
    Yv, Lili
    Liu, Kun
    Tian, Xiufang
    Lv, Yajuan
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 187
  • [5] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots
    Tran Thi Thao Nguyen
    Hidetaka Arimura
    Ryosuke Asamura
    Taka-aki Hirose
    Saiji Ohga
    Jun-ichi Fukunaga
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2019, 12 : 137 - 148
  • [6] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots
    Tran Thi Thao Nguyen
    Arimura, Hidetaka
    Asamura, Ryosuke
    Hirose, Taka-aki
    Ohga, Saiji
    Fukunaga, Jun-ichi
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 12 (02) : 137 - 148
  • [7] Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer
    Lin, Jia-Fu
    Yeh, Dah-Cherng
    Yeh, Hui-Ling
    Chang, Chen-Fa
    Lin, Jin-Ching
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [8] Validation of Delivery Consistency for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans
    Woon, Wui Ann
    Ravindran, Paul B.
    Ekayanake, Piyasiri
    Lim, Yivonne Yih Fang
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [9] Volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate cancer with flattened beam and flattening filter free linear accelerators
    Treutwein, Marius
    Hipp, Matthias
    Koelbl, Oliver
    Dobler, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (05): : 307 - 314
  • [10] Dosimetric analysis and comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for liver carcinoma
    Chiang, Bing-Hao
    Schnell, Erich
    Hibbitts, Kerry
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (01) : 138 - 140