Glenoid suture anchor fixation strength: Effect of insertion angle

被引:27
|
作者
Ilahi, OA [1 ]
Al-Fahl, T [1 ]
Bahrani, H [1 ]
Luo, ZP [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY | 2004年 / 20卷 / 06期
关键词
fixation; SLAP; Bankart; labrum; suture anchor;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2004.04.063
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of varying insertion angles on the fixation strength of screw-in devices placed in the glenoid rim. Type of Study: Cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Methods: Eighteen cadaveric glenoids had 3.0-mm cannulated screws inserted for a depth of 10 mm in all 4 quadrants: anterior superior (AS), anterior inferior (AT), posterior superior (PS), posterior inferior (PI). Screws were inserted along the orthogonal to the glenoid rim at the point of insertion or at angles that deviated from this vector by 20degrees and 40degrees. Load to failure was performed at 10 mm/s along the orthogonal to the point of insertion. Results: For screws inserted orthogonal to the glenoid rim, the average load to failure was highest for the PS quadrant (733 +/- 369 N) and lowest for the AT quadrant (272 69 N). The AS and PI quadrants showed intermediate values (549 +/- 334 N and 484 +/- 141 N, respectively). Deviation from orthogonal correlated with decreased fixation strength. This decrease was statistically significant in the AS and PI quadrants, with deviation of 40degrees, and in the AT quadrant, with deviation of 20degrees, as well as 40degrees. Conclusions: Insertion angles for screw-in fixation devices should be orthogonal to the glenoid rim at the point of insertion to maximize strength. Deviation of 40degrees from orthogonal compromises fixation in most quadrants and deviation as little as 20degrees can compromise fixation in the AT quadrant. Clinical Relevance: To maximize strength of labral reattachment to the bony glenoid, screw-in type fixation devices should be inserted as orthogonal to the glenoid rim as possible. This is especially true for Bankart repairs, because device pullout occurs at significantly lower loads in the anteroinferior quadrant compared with the other 3 quadrants. Deviating as little as 20degrees further decreases fixation strength significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 613
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Suture anchor fixation strength in the Latarjet procedure: a biomechanical study in cadavers
    Saleky, Behzad
    Hapa, Onur
    Isin, Yagmur
    Guvencer, Mustafa
    Havitcioglu, Hasan
    Uzun, Bora
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (08): : 1667 - 1672
  • [12] A biomechanical study on suture anchor insertion angle: Which is better, 90° or 45°?
    Nagamoto, Hideaki
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    Sano, Hirotaka
    Itoi, Eiji
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [13] The Effect of Insertion Angle on the Pullout Strength of Threaded Suture Anchors: A Validation of the Deadman Theory
    Clevenger, Todd A.
    Beebe, Michael J.
    Strauss, Eric J.
    Kubiak, Erik N.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (08): : 900 - 905
  • [14] Slight Reduction in the Insertion Depth for an All-Suture Anchor Decreases Cyclic Displacement in the Shoulder Glenoid
    Ruder, John A.
    Dickinson, Ephraim Y.
    Habet, Nahir
    Peindl, Richard D.
    D'Alessandro, Donald F.
    Fleischli, James E.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (05): : 1384 - 1390
  • [15] Biomechanical Comparison of Tibial Eminence Fracture Fixation With High-Strength Suture, EndoButton, and Suture Anchor
    Hapa, Onur
    Barber, F. Alan
    Suner, Ganim
    Ozden, Raif
    Davul, Serkan
    Bozdag, Ergun
    Sunbuloglu, Emin
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (05): : 681 - 687
  • [16] Suture anchor strength revisited
    Barber, FA
    Herbert, MA
    Click, JN
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (01): : 32 - 38
  • [17] Defining a Safety Margin for Labral Suture Anchor Insertion Using the Acetabular Rim Angle
    Lertwanich, Pisit
    Ejnisman, Leandro
    Torry, Michael R.
    Giphart, J. Erik
    Philippon, Marc J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 : 111S - 116S
  • [18] Maximum load to failure and tensile displacement of an all-suture glenoid anchor compared with a screw-in glenoid anchor
    Tim Dwyer
    Thomas L. Willett
    Andrew P. Dold
    Massimo Petrera
    David Wasserstein
    Danny B. Whelan
    John S. Theodoropoulos
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 357 - 364
  • [19] Maximum load to failure and tensile displacement of an all-suture glenoid anchor compared with a screw-in glenoid anchor
    Dwyer, Tim
    Willett, Thomas L.
    Dold, Andrew P.
    Petrera, Massimo
    Wasserstein, David
    Whelan, Danny B.
    Theodoropoulos, John S.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (02) : 357 - 364
  • [20] Bone suture anchor fixation in the lower extremity: A review of insertion principles and a comparative biomechanical evaluation
    Scranton, PE
    Lawhon, SM
    McDermott, JE
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 26 (07) : 516 - 519