Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry

被引:22
|
作者
Mansoori, Tarannum [1 ]
Balakrishna, Nagalla [2 ]
机构
[1] Anand Eye Inst, Dept Glaucoma, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Natl Inst Nutr, Dept Stat, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
central corneal thickness; Goldmann applanation tonometer; Topcon CT-80 NCT; PNEUMOTONOMETER; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/cxo.12620
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes. Methods: Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (<= 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and >= 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis. Results: The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 +/- 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of <= 12 mmHg, -1.665 +/- 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and -2.202 +/- 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of >= 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 m change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 mu m change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01). Conclusion: In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 212
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness - A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry
    Domke, N.
    Hager, A.
    Wiegand, W.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2006, 103 (07): : 583 - 587
  • [2] The Association of Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measures by Non-Contact Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry among Glaucoma Patients.
    Kyei, Samuel
    Assiamah, Frank
    Kwarteng, Michael Agyemang
    Gboglu, Cynthia Pakyennu
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 30 (06) : 999 - 1004
  • [3] Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals
    Khalid Kamel
    Edward Dervan
    Kevin Falzon
    Colm O’Brien
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2019, 188 : 321 - 325
  • [4] Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals
    Kamel, Khalid
    Dervan, Edward
    Falzon, Kevin
    O'Brien, Colm
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 (01) : 321 - 325
  • [5] Comparison of rebound tonometry and non-contact airpuff tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Demirci, Goktug
    Erdur, Sevil Karaman
    Tanriverdi, Cafer
    Gulkitik, Gokhan
    Ozsutcu, Mustafa
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 11
  • [6] Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness
    Iliev, M. E.
    Goldblum, D.
    Katsoulis, K.
    Amstutz, C.
    Frueh, B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 90 (07) : 833 - 835
  • [7] Corneal thickness and Intraocular pressure After DSAEK: comparison of Dynamic Contour tonometry with Goldmann Applanation tonometry
    Borges, Barbara
    Vicente, Andre
    Anjos, Rita
    Vieira, Luisa
    Santos, Arnaldo Dias
    Ferreira, Joana
    Maduro, Vitor
    Alves, Nuno
    Feijao, Joao
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [8] The influence of corneal density and thickness on tonometry measurement with goldmann applanation, non-contact and iCare tonometry methods
    Ahmed Lubbad
    Irene Oluwatoba-Popoola
    Melanie Haar
    Carsten Framme
    Anna Bajor
    International Ophthalmology, 2022, 42 : 2167 - 2174
  • [9] The influence of corneal density and thickness on tonometry measurement with goldmann applanation, non-contact and iCare tonometry methods
    Lubbad, Ahmed
    Oluwatoba-Popoola, Irene
    Haar, Melanie
    Framme, Carsten
    Bajor, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (07) : 2167 - 2174
  • [10] Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure
    Hamilton, Kirsten Elizabeth
    Pye, David Cecil
    Aggarwala, Shivani
    Evian, Sindy
    Khosla, Joti
    Perera, Rachithri
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2007, 16 (01) : 29 - 35