National comprehensive cancer network recommendations for drugs without US food and drug administration approval in metastatic breast cancer: A cross-sectional study

被引:5
|
作者
Etan, Tal [1 ,2 ]
Amir, Eitan [3 ]
Tibau, Adriane [4 ,5 ]
Yerushalmi, Rinat [2 ,6 ]
Moore, Assaf [2 ,6 ]
Shepshelovich, Daniel [2 ,7 ]
Goldvaser, Hadar [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Inst Oncol, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Chaim Levanon St 30, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Inst Invest Biomed St Pau, Dept Oncol, Carrer St Quinti 89, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Carrer St Quinti 89, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Rabin Med Ctr, Inst Oncol, Zeev Jabutinsky Rd 39, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[7] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Internal Med T, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
NCCN; Metastatic breast cancer; FDA; Off-label; Anti-cancer drugs; PHASE-III TRIAL; OFF-LABEL USE; TARGETED THERAPY; NCCN GUIDELINES; ANTHRACYCLINE; COMBINATION; PACLITAXEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; SAFETY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102113
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines can include recommendations for off label use of anti-cancer drugs. Here, we evaluate NCCN recommendations not supported by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and explore associations with such recommendations. Methods: All NCCN recommendations for MBC and their supporting data were identified. Drug labels were reviewed to determine whether recommendations are FDA approved. Logistic regression was used to compare FDA approved and off-label recommendations for pre-specified categories, including drug type, tumor subtype, level of recommendation and line of therapy. Results: Of 124 recommendations identified, 68 (55%) were off-label. Chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted drugs were associated with lower odds of FDA approval (OR = 0.28, p = 0.001 and OR = 0.29, 95% p = 0.005, respectively). Recommendations for endocrine therapy (OR = 3.44, p = 0.009) and non-HER2 targeted treatment (OR = 10.0, p < 0.001) were more commonly FDA approved indications. Compared to combination therapies, monotherapies were more likely to be FDA approved (OR = 3.45, p = 0.001) as were category 1 (OR = 7.63, p = 0.001) and preferred NCCN recommendations (OR = 4.07, p < 0.001). Compared to off-label recommendations, NCCN recommendations of approved drugs were based on significantly higher sample size (mean 477 vs. 342 patients, p = 0.02) and were non-significantly associated with availability of randomized data (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 0.89-4.49, p = 0.09). Conclusion: More than half of all NCCN recommendations for MBC are off-label, mostly involving chemotherapy containing regimes for HER2 negative disease and combinations which include HER2-targeted drugs. Improved transparency of NCCN guidelines may result from reporting of the strength of the evidence supporting recommendations for MBC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Population-based validation of the National Cancer Comprehensive Network recommendations for breast cancer staging
    Omar Abdel-Rahman
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 172 : 231 - 238
  • [33] Pelvic floor muscle function in women with and without breast cancer: A cross-sectional study
    Colombage, Udari N.
    Soh, Sze-Ee
    Lin, Kuan-Yin
    Frawley, Helena C.
    CONTINENCE, 2023, 5
  • [34] Financial toxicity in female patients with breast cancer: a national cross-sectional study in China
    Liu, Meicen
    Hu, Linlin
    Han, Xueyan
    Cao, Man
    Sun, Jing
    Liu, Yuanli
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (10) : 8231 - 8240
  • [35] Magnitude of Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
    Tibau, Ariadna
    Molto, Consolacion
    Ocana, Alberto
    Templeton, Arnoud J.
    Del Carpio, Luis P.
    Del Paggio, Joseph C.
    Barnadas, Agusti
    Booth, Christopher M.
    Amir, Eitan
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2018, 110 (05): : 486 - 492
  • [36] Financial toxicity in female patients with breast cancer: a national cross-sectional study in China
    Meicen Liu
    Linlin Hu
    Xueyan Han
    Man Cao
    Jing Sun
    Yuanli Liu
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 8231 - 8240
  • [37] Partial Orphan Cancer Drugs: US Food and Drug Administration Approval, Clinical Benefit, Trials, Epidemiology, Price, Beneficiaries, and Spending
    Michaeli, Thomas
    Michaeli, Daniel Tobias
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (04) : 449 - 457
  • [38] US Food and Drug Administration recalls of cosmetic and personal products from 2011 to 2023: A cross-sectional study
    Venkatesh, Kaushik P.
    Kadakia, Kushal T.
    Akbarpour, Ashkan
    Nambudiri, Vinod E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2025, 92 (01) : 179 - 181
  • [39] A US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pooled analysis of outcomes for bone only metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
    Wedam, Suparna B.
    Beaver, Julia A.
    Amiri-Kordestani, Laleh
    Bloomquist, Erik
    Tang, Shenghui
    Sridhara, Rajeshwari
    Ibrahim, Amna
    Kim, Geoffrey
    Kluetz, Paul Gustav
    McKee, Amy E.
    Pazdur, Richard
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [40] Cardiovascular Safety Communications After US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Contemporary Cancer Therapies
    Bonsu, Janice M.
    Kola-Kehinde, Onaopepo
    Kim, Lisa
    Ruz, Patrick
    Campbell, Courtney M.
    Brammer, Jonathan E.
    Addison, Daniel
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (11) : 1722 - 1723