National comprehensive cancer network recommendations for drugs without US food and drug administration approval in metastatic breast cancer: A cross-sectional study

被引:5
|
作者
Etan, Tal [1 ,2 ]
Amir, Eitan [3 ]
Tibau, Adriane [4 ,5 ]
Yerushalmi, Rinat [2 ,6 ]
Moore, Assaf [2 ,6 ]
Shepshelovich, Daniel [2 ,7 ]
Goldvaser, Hadar [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Inst Oncol, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Chaim Levanon St 30, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Inst Invest Biomed St Pau, Dept Oncol, Carrer St Quinti 89, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Carrer St Quinti 89, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Rabin Med Ctr, Inst Oncol, Zeev Jabutinsky Rd 39, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[7] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Internal Med T, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
NCCN; Metastatic breast cancer; FDA; Off-label; Anti-cancer drugs; PHASE-III TRIAL; OFF-LABEL USE; TARGETED THERAPY; NCCN GUIDELINES; ANTHRACYCLINE; COMBINATION; PACLITAXEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; SAFETY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102113
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines can include recommendations for off label use of anti-cancer drugs. Here, we evaluate NCCN recommendations not supported by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and explore associations with such recommendations. Methods: All NCCN recommendations for MBC and their supporting data were identified. Drug labels were reviewed to determine whether recommendations are FDA approved. Logistic regression was used to compare FDA approved and off-label recommendations for pre-specified categories, including drug type, tumor subtype, level of recommendation and line of therapy. Results: Of 124 recommendations identified, 68 (55%) were off-label. Chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted drugs were associated with lower odds of FDA approval (OR = 0.28, p = 0.001 and OR = 0.29, 95% p = 0.005, respectively). Recommendations for endocrine therapy (OR = 3.44, p = 0.009) and non-HER2 targeted treatment (OR = 10.0, p < 0.001) were more commonly FDA approved indications. Compared to combination therapies, monotherapies were more likely to be FDA approved (OR = 3.45, p = 0.001) as were category 1 (OR = 7.63, p = 0.001) and preferred NCCN recommendations (OR = 4.07, p < 0.001). Compared to off-label recommendations, NCCN recommendations of approved drugs were based on significantly higher sample size (mean 477 vs. 342 patients, p = 0.02) and were non-significantly associated with availability of randomized data (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 0.89-4.49, p = 0.09). Conclusion: More than half of all NCCN recommendations for MBC are off-label, mostly involving chemotherapy containing regimes for HER2 negative disease and combinations which include HER2-targeted drugs. Improved transparency of NCCN guidelines may result from reporting of the strength of the evidence supporting recommendations for MBC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anxiety and Depression in Young Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Park, Eliza M.
    Gelber, Shari
    Rosenberg, Shoshana M.
    Seah, Davinia S. E.
    Schapira, Lidia
    Come, Steven E.
    Partridge, Ann H.
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2018, 59 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [22] Performance status restrictions in clinical trials leading to US food and drug administration (FDA) drug approval: A cross-sectional study of a decade (2014-2023)
    Iannantuono, G. M.
    Filetti, M.
    Giudice, E.
    Sganga, S.
    Chandran, E. B. A.
    Xue, E.
    Lombardi, P.
    Rosenfeld, R.
    Rapisarda, E.
    Ferri, L.
    De Rubeis, G.
    Lorusso, D.
    Floudas, C.
    Gulley, J. L.
    Apolo, A. B.
    Lee, J-M.
    Karzai, F.
    Altamura, V.
    Scambia, G.
    Daniele, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S956 - S957
  • [23] National Anti-VEGF Utilization for Conditions without US Food and Drug Administration Approval: An IRIS Registry Study
    Zhang, Casey
    Kahan, Elias
    Mittal, Rhiya
    Friedman, Scott
    Lum, Flora
    Parikh, Ravi
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [24] National Comprehensive Cancer Network investigational drug service consensus recommendations
    Amin, Sapna
    Polley, Stephen
    DeFrates, Sean
    Finnes, Heidi D.
    Kinsman, Katharine
    MacDonald, Elyse
    Dean, Latanya
    DeWitt, Lorri
    Harvey, Caroline
    Johnston, Susan
    Leung, Tzewah Vivian
    Moll, Emily A.
    O'Neill, Gerald P.
    Redic, Kimberly A.
    Park, Sharon F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2022, 79 (06) : 486 - 491
  • [25] Time from US Food and Drug Administration approval to publication of data for cancer drugs: a comparison of first and subsequent approvals
    Lammers, Austin
    Wang, Ruibin
    Cetnar, Jeremy
    Prasad, Vinay
    BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL, 2017, 7
  • [26] Time from US Food and Drug Administration approval to publication of data for cancer drugs: a comparison of first and subsequent approvals
    Austin Lammers
    Ruibin Wang
    Jeremy Cetnar
    Vinay Prasad
    Blood Cancer Journal, 7
  • [27] US Food and Drug Administration anticancer drug approval trends from 2016 to 2018 for lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer
    Ribeiro, Tatiane Bomfim
    Ribeiro, Adalton
    Rodrigues, Luiza de Oliveira
    Harada, Guilherme
    Nobre, Moacyr Roberto Cuce
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 36 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [28] Complete remission in metastatic breast cancer: expecting the unexpected—results of a cross-sectional study
    Giulia Galli
    Anna Tessari
    Luca Porcu
    Giacomo Bregni
    Biagio Paolini
    Maria Luisa Carcangiu
    Massimiliano Gennaro
    Maria Carmen De Santis
    Laura Lozza
    Filippo de Braud
    Serena Di Cosimo
    Breast Cancer, 2017, 24 : 635 - 641
  • [29] Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
    Lopez-Jornet, Pia
    Aznar, Cristina
    Ceron, Jose
    Asta, Tvarijonaviciute
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (02) : 889 - 896
  • [30] Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer: a cross-sectional study
    Pía López-Jornet
    Cristina Aznar
    Jose Ceron
    Tvarijonaviciute Asta
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 889 - 896