Responsiveness of self-report scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery

被引:64
|
作者
MacDermid, Joy C.
Drosdowech, Darren
Faber, Ken
机构
[1] St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Clin Res Lab, Hand & Upper Limb Ctr, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.005
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A consecutive series of patients (n = 149) completed 4 self reporting scales (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire; Simple Shoulder Test [SST]; Western Ontario Rotator Cuff [WORC] questionnaire; and Short Form 36 [SF-36]) during the week before rotator cuff repair and 6 months after surgery. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who had a positive response on all 3 upper extremity scales (n = 86) were classified as positive responders, those who did not demonstrate a consistent direction of response across scales were labeled as equivocal responders (n = 36), and those with a negative response across all 3 scales were labeled as negative responders (n = 15). Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated. The WORC questionnaire (SRM, 2.0) and SST (SRM, 1.8) were most responsive to detecting improvement, followed by the DASH questionnaire (SRM, 1.6). The SF-36 was least responsive, with the largest effect on health being noted in the SF-36 subscale on bodily pain (SRM, 1.1). Pearson correlations indicated moderate associations between change scores across upper limb scales (r = 0.68-0.72) and lower associations with SF-36 physical summary scores (r = 0.40-0.50). Mental health scores were lower at baseline and changed more negatively in patients who did not have a positive response to surgery. No best scale can be identified at this time.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 414
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Proactive and Reactive Aggressive Behaviors: Dimensionality of Self-Report Scales
    Borsa, Juliane Callegaro
    Hauck-Filho, Nelson
    Damasio, Bruno Figueiredo
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 22 : E47
  • [42] THE RELAXATION INVENTORY - SELF-REPORT SCALES OF RELAXATION TRAINING EFFECTS
    CRIST, DA
    RICKARD, HC
    PRENTICEDUNN, S
    BARKER, HR
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1989, 53 (04) : 716 - 726
  • [43] Underestimating the effects of faking on the validity of self-report personality scales
    Holden, Ronald R.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 44 (01) : 311 - 321
  • [44] The role of psychological self-report scales in selection and evaluation of drivers
    Yasak, Yesim
    Batigun, Aysegul Durak
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 11 (03): : 235 - 241
  • [45] QUICK AND CONVENIENT ASSESSMENT OF HYPNOTIC DEPTH - SELF-REPORT SCALES
    TART, CT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPNOSIS, 1979, 21 (2-3) : 186 - 207
  • [46] Comparative evaluation of two self-report mania rating scales
    Cooke, RG
    Kruger, S
    Shugar, G
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 40 (04) : 279 - 283
  • [47] Assessing Creativity With Self-Report Scales: A Review and Empirical Evaluation
    Silvia, Paul J.
    Wigert, Benjamin
    Reiter-Palmon, Roni
    Kaufman, James C.
    PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2012, 6 (01) : 19 - 34
  • [48] Comparison of the responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) with DASH, UCLA and SF-36 in patients with rotator cuff disorders
    Lopes, A. Diniz
    Ciconelli, R. M.
    Carrera, E. F.
    Griffin, S.
    Faloppa, F.
    dos Reis, F. Baldy
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 27 (05) : 758 - 764
  • [49] SONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF THE ROTATOR CUFF - ACCURACY IN PATIENTS WITHOUT PRIOR SURGERY
    MACK, LA
    GANNON, MK
    KILCOYNE, RF
    MATSEN, FA
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1988, (234) : 21 - 27