Responsiveness of self-report scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery

被引:64
|
作者
MacDermid, Joy C.
Drosdowech, Darren
Faber, Ken
机构
[1] St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Clin Res Lab, Hand & Upper Limb Ctr, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.005
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A consecutive series of patients (n = 149) completed 4 self reporting scales (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire; Simple Shoulder Test [SST]; Western Ontario Rotator Cuff [WORC] questionnaire; and Short Form 36 [SF-36]) during the week before rotator cuff repair and 6 months after surgery. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who had a positive response on all 3 upper extremity scales (n = 86) were classified as positive responders, those who did not demonstrate a consistent direction of response across scales were labeled as equivocal responders (n = 36), and those with a negative response across all 3 scales were labeled as negative responders (n = 15). Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated. The WORC questionnaire (SRM, 2.0) and SST (SRM, 1.8) were most responsive to detecting improvement, followed by the DASH questionnaire (SRM, 1.6). The SF-36 was least responsive, with the largest effect on health being noted in the SF-36 subscale on bodily pain (SRM, 1.1). Pearson correlations indicated moderate associations between change scores across upper limb scales (r = 0.68-0.72) and lower associations with SF-36 physical summary scores (r = 0.40-0.50). Mental health scores were lower at baseline and changed more negatively in patients who did not have a positive response to surgery. No best scale can be identified at this time.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 414
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effects of repeated administrations on self-report and parent-report scales
    Durham, CJ
    McGrath, LD
    Burlingame, GM
    Schaalje, GB
    Lambert, MJ
    Davies, DR
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2002, 20 (03) : 240 - 257
  • [32] Reliability of surgical memory and self-report in patients with prior strabismus surgery
    Bu, Jennifer J. J.
    Granet, David B.
    Bhatia, Shagun
    Robbins, Shira L.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 51 (08): : 873 - 874
  • [33] The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients
    Hedayati, SS
    Bosworth, HB
    Kuchibhatla, M
    Kimmel, PL
    Szczech, LA
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 69 (09) : 1662 - 1668
  • [34] Comparison of two self-report scales to assess anxiety and depressive symptoms in hemodialysis patients
    Alshogran, Osama Y.
    Altawalbeh, Shoroq M.
    Khalil, Amani A.
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2022, 41 : 208 - 213
  • [35] SELF-REPORT DEPRESSION SCALES FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS IN PRIMARY CARE - A PRELIMINARY-STUDY
    VANMARWIJK, H
    ARNOLD, I
    BONNEMA, J
    KAPTEIN, AD
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 1993, 10 (01) : 63 - 65
  • [36] Responsiveness of Self-Report Measures in Individuals With Vertigo, Dizziness, and Unsteadiness
    Friscia, Lauren A.
    Morgan, Michael T.
    Sparto, Patrick J.
    Furman, Joseph M.
    Whitney, Susan L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (05) : 884 - 888
  • [37] Self-report scales alone cannot capture mental workload
    de Waard, Dick
    Lewis-Evans, Ben
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2014, 16 (03) : 303 - 305
  • [39] The Measurement of Boredom: Differences Between Existing Self-Report Scales
    Mercer-Lynn, Kimberley B.
    Flora, David B.
    Fahlman, Shelley A.
    Eastwood, John D.
    ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (05) : 585 - 596
  • [40] Three studies on self-report scales to detect bipolar disorder
    Miller, Christopher J.
    Johnson, Sheri L.
    Kwapil, Thomas R.
    Carver, Charles S.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2011, 128 (03) : 199 - 210