Comparisons of Monte Carlo and ICRU electron energy vs. range equations

被引:8
|
作者
Cleland, MR
Lisanti, TF
Galloway, RA
机构
[1] IBA Technol Grp, Hauppauge, NY 11788 USA
[2] IBA Technol Grp, Edgewood, NY 11717 USA
关键词
depth-dose; electron range; electron energy; Monte Carlo; water; polystyrene;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.078
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Depth-dose distributions in water and in polystyrene absorbers with a variety of incident electron energies extending from 0.3 to 25 MeV have been calculated with the one-dimensional ITS TIGER Monte Carlo code. Practical electron ranges have been obtained from these distribution curves using a new mathematical procedure. Polynomial equations have been derived which correlate the electron energy vs. range values within 1% from the lowest to the highest energies. Comparisons of the electron energies obtained with our theoretical equation for water with the values IF obtained with the empirical equation given in ICRU Report 35 show agreement within about 1% for electron energies between 5 and 25 MeV. This close agreement provides assurance that the ranges obtained by Monte Carlo calculations are reliable for these energies. The energy differences between our theoretical equation for water and the ICRU empirical equation tend to increase for lower energies. The maximum disagreement is about 8% for electron energies below 1 MeV. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 589
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proton range verification in inhomogeneous tissue: Treatment planning system vs. measurement vs. Monte Carlo simulation
    Kim, Dae-Hyun
    Cho, Sungkoo
    Jo, Kwanghyun
    Shin, EunHyuk
    Hong, Chae-Seon
    Han, Youngyih
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    Lim, Do Hoon
    Choi, Doo Ho
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [2] Monte Carlo vs. Fuzzy Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis
    Kim, Young-Jin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [3] Monte-carlo simulations:: FLUKA vs. MCNPX
    Oden, M.
    Krasa, A.
    Majerlel, M.
    Svoboda, O.
    Wagner, V.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS METHODS AND ACCELERATORS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 958 : 219 - 221
  • [4] Evaluating Embedded Monte Carlo vs. Total Monte Carlo for Nuclear Data Uncertainty Quantification
    Biot, Gregoire
    Rochman, Dimitri
    Ducru, Pablo
    Forget, Benoit
    JOINT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUPERCOMPUTING IN NUCLEAR APPLICATIONS + MONTE CARLO, SNA + MC 2024, 2024, 302
  • [5] Impact of Dm Vs. Dw in Electron Beam Monte Carlo Based Treatment Planning for Breast
    Gil, E.
    Vandervoort, E.
    Clark, B.
    Cygler, J. E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [6] On the Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport in the sub-1 keV energy range
    Thomson, Rowan M.
    Kawrakow, Iwan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (08) : 4531 - 4534
  • [7] On the Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron Transport in the Sub-1 KeV Energy Range
    Thomson, R. M.
    Kawrakow, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3643 - +
  • [8] Monte Carlo assessment of low energy electron range in liquid water and dosimetry effects
    Seniwal, Baljeet
    Mendes, Bruno M.
    Malano, Francisco
    Perez, Pedro
    Valente, Mauro
    Fonseca, Telma C. F.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 80 : 363 - 372
  • [9] Spatial modeling of dimerization reaction dynamics in the plasma membrane: Monte Carlo vs. continuum differential equations
    Mayawala, Kapil
    Vlachos, Dionisios G.
    Edwards, Jeremy S.
    BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 121 (03) : 194 - 208
  • [10] Nuclear data uncertainty propagation: Perturbation vs. Monte Carlo
    Rochman, D.
    Koning, A. J.
    van der Marck, S. C.
    Hogenbirk, A.
    Sciolla, C. M.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2011, 38 (05) : 942 - 952