Comparisons of Monte Carlo and ICRU electron energy vs. range equations

被引:8
|
作者
Cleland, MR
Lisanti, TF
Galloway, RA
机构
[1] IBA Technol Grp, Hauppauge, NY 11788 USA
[2] IBA Technol Grp, Edgewood, NY 11717 USA
关键词
depth-dose; electron range; electron energy; Monte Carlo; water; polystyrene;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.078
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Depth-dose distributions in water and in polystyrene absorbers with a variety of incident electron energies extending from 0.3 to 25 MeV have been calculated with the one-dimensional ITS TIGER Monte Carlo code. Practical electron ranges have been obtained from these distribution curves using a new mathematical procedure. Polynomial equations have been derived which correlate the electron energy vs. range values within 1% from the lowest to the highest energies. Comparisons of the electron energies obtained with our theoretical equation for water with the values IF obtained with the empirical equation given in ICRU Report 35 show agreement within about 1% for electron energies between 5 and 25 MeV. This close agreement provides assurance that the ranges obtained by Monte Carlo calculations are reliable for these energies. The energy differences between our theoretical equation for water and the ICRU empirical equation tend to increase for lower energies. The maximum disagreement is about 8% for electron energies below 1 MeV. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 589
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Markov Chain Monte Carlo Effective Range Analysis of Low-Energy Electron Elastic Scattering from Xenon
    Fedus, Kamil
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2016, 46 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [42] Markov Chain Monte Carlo Effective Range Analysis of Low-Energy Electron Elastic Scattering from Xenon
    Kamil Fedus
    Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2016, 46 : 1 - 9
  • [43] Eclise AAA vs. pinnacle dose prediction for transit dosimetry: Comparison with Monte Carlo
    Popescu, C.
    Greer, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S225 - S225
  • [44] Polynomial chaos expansion vs. Monte Carlo simulation in a stochastic analysis of wave propagation
    Herbut, Aneta
    Brzakala, Wlodzimierz
    WAVE MOTION, 2024, 130
  • [45] Nuclear data uncertainty for criticality-safety: Monte Carlo vs. linear perturbation
    Rochman, D.
    Vasiliev, A.
    Ferroukhi, H.
    Zhu, T.
    van der Marck, S. C.
    Koning, A. J.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2016, 92 : 150 - 160
  • [46] Second Moment Reliability Evaluation vs. Monte Carlo Simulations for Weld Fatigue Strength
    Loren, Sara
    Svensson, Thomas
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 28 (08) : 887 - 896
  • [47] Monte Carlo simulation of bremsstrahlung spectra for low energy electron accelerators
    Haysak, I. I.
    Takhtasiev, O., V
    Khushvaktov, J.
    Solnyshkin, A. A.
    Tanchak, A.
    Holomb, R. R.
    Katovsky, K.
    2020 21ST INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING (EPE), 2020, : 362 - 365
  • [49] Electron energy loss modelling in small volumes: A Monte Carlo study
    Chaoui, Zine-EI-Abidine
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2008, 266 (23): : 4976 - 4979
  • [50] Monte Carlo calculations of the reflection electron energy loss spectra in gold
    Kwei, CM
    Su, P
    Chen, YF
    Tung, CJ
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1997, 30 (01) : 13 - 18