Proton range verification in inhomogeneous tissue: Treatment planning system vs. measurement vs. Monte Carlo simulation

被引:14
|
作者
Kim, Dae-Hyun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cho, Sungkoo [1 ]
Jo, Kwanghyun [1 ]
Shin, EunHyuk [1 ]
Hong, Chae-Seon [1 ]
Han, Youngyih [1 ]
Suh, Tae-Suk [2 ,3 ]
Lim, Do Hoon [1 ]
Choi, Doo Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Biomed Engn, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Res Inst Biomed Engn, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 03期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
PENCIL BEAM ALGORITHM; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSE CALCULATION; STOPPING POWER; BRAGG PEAK; UNCERTAINTIES; GEANT4; NOZZLE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0193904
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In particle radiotherapy, range uncertainty is an important issue that needs to be overcome. Because high-dose conformality can be achieved using a particle beam, a small uncertainty can affect tumor control or cause normal-tissue complications. From this perspective, the treatment planning system (TPS) must be accurate. However, there is a well-known inaccuracy regarding dose computation in heterogeneous media. This means that verifying the uncertainty level is one of the prerequisites for TPS commissioning. We evaluated the range accuracy of the dose computation algorithm implemented in a commercial TPS, and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation against measurement using a CT calibration phantom. A treatment plan was produced for eight different materials plugged into a phantom, and two-dimensional doses were measured using a chamber array. The measurement setup and beam delivery were simulated by MC code. For an infinite solid water phantom, the gamma passing rate between the measurement and TPS was 97.7%, and that between the measurement and MC was 96.5%. However, gamma passing rates between the measurement and TPS were 49.4% for the lung and 67.8% for bone, and between the measurement and MC were 85.6% for the lung and 100.0% for bone tissue. For adipose, breast, brain, liver, and bone mineral, the gamma passing rates computed by TPS were 91.7%, 90.6%, 81.7%, 85.6%, and 85.6%, respectively. The gamma passing rates for MC for adipose, breast, brain, liver, and bone mineral were 100.0%, 97.2%, 95.0%, 98.9%, and 97.8%, respectively. In conclusion, the described procedure successfully evaluated the allowable range uncertainty for TPS commissioning. The TPS dose calculation is inefficient in heterogeneous media with large differences in density, such as lung or bone tissue. Therefore, the limitations of TPS in heterogeneous media should be understood and applied in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monte Carlo vs. Fuzzy Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis
    Kim, Young-Jin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [2] High-Performance Quasi-Monte Carlo Financial Simulation: FPGA vs. GPP vs. GPU
    Tian, Xiang
    Benkrid, Khaled
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON RECONFIGURABLE TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 3 (04)
  • [3] Comparisons of Monte Carlo and ICRU electron energy vs. range equations
    Cleland, MR
    Lisanti, TF
    Galloway, RA
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 71 (1-2) : 585 - 589
  • [4] Impact of Dm Vs. Dw in Electron Beam Monte Carlo Based Treatment Planning for Breast
    Gil, E.
    Vandervoort, E.
    Clark, B.
    Cygler, J. E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [5] MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATION VS. ENHANCED COLLAPSED CONE ALGORITHM FOR IMRT TREATMENT PLANNING
    Fotina, I.
    Kroupa, B.
    Georg, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S58 - S58
  • [6] Process simulation vs. system simulation
    Harrell, C
    1998 IEEE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 41 - 44
  • [7] Technical vs. Process Commissioning Measurement And Verification
    Gordon, Scott
    McFarlane, Dave
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2014, 56 (08) : 32 - 37
  • [8] Monte-carlo simulations:: FLUKA vs. MCNPX
    Oden, M.
    Krasa, A.
    Majerlel, M.
    Svoboda, O.
    Wagner, V.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS METHODS AND ACCELERATORS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 958 : 219 - 221
  • [9] Monte Carlo computer simulation of a camera system for proton beam range verification in cancer treatment
    Sun, Xiao-Li
    Wang, Hui
    Li, Xin-Ke
    Cao, Guo-Hong
    Kuang, Yu
    Zhang, Xiao-Chen
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2020, 102 (102): : 978 - 991
  • [10] Strategic vs. long-range planning
    不详
    FUTURIST, 2001, 35 (02) : 56 - 56