The Open Latarjet Procedure Is More Reliable in Terms of Shoulder Stability Than Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

被引:187
|
作者
Bessiere, Charles [1 ]
Trojani, Christophe [1 ]
Carles, Michel [1 ]
Mehta, Saurabh S. [1 ]
Boileau, Pascal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nice Sophia Antipolis, Hop Archet, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Sports Traumatol, F-06202 Nice, France
关键词
ANTERIOR CORACOID ABUTMENTS; HILL-SACHS REMPLISSAGE; GLENOID BONE LOSS; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BRISTOW-LATARJET; INSTABILITY; STABILIZATION; LESIONS; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-014-3550-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet bone block procedure are widely considered mainstays for surgical treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The choice between these procedures depends mainly on surgeon preference or training rather than published evidence. We compared patients with recurrent posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart or open Latarjet procedure in terms of (1) frequency and timing of recurrent instability, (2) risk factors for recurrent instability, and (3) patient-reported outcomes. In this retrospective comparative study, we paired 93 patients undergoing open Latarjet procedures with 93 patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repairs over the same period for posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability by one of four surgeons at the same center. Both groups were comparable except that patients in the Latarjet group had more glenoid lesions and more instability episodes preoperatively. Minimum followup was 4 years (mean, 6 years; range, 4-10 years). Patients were assessed with a questionnaire, including stability, Rowe score, and return to sports. Recurrent instability was defined as at least one episode of recurrent dislocation or subluxation. Return to sports was evaluated using a 0% to 100% scale that patients completed after recovery from surgery. Various risk factors for recurrent instability were also analyzed. At latest followup, 10% (nine of 93) in the Latarjet group and 22% (20 of 93) in the Bankart group demonstrated recurrent instability (p = 0.026; odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.91). Ten recurrences in the Bankart group (50%) occurred after 2 years, compared to only one (11%) in the Latarjet group. Reoperation rate was 6% and 7% in the Bankart and Latarjet groups, respectively. In both groups, patients younger than 20 years had higher recurrence risk (p = 0.019). In the Bankart group, independent factors predictive for recurrence were practice of competitive sports and shoulder hyperlaxity (ie, passive external rotation > 85A degrees in the contralateral uninjured shoulder). Although return to sports was not different between groups, the mean Rowe score was higher in the Latarjet group (78 versus 68, p = 0.018). Patients who had the open Latarjet procedure had less recurrent instability and better Rowe scores over a mean 6-year followup. We now perform isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair for carefully selected patients, including patients with an Instability Severity Index Score of 3 or less. Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:2345 / 2351
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparison of Physical Therapy Protocols Between Open Latarjet Coracoid Transfer and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    Beletsky, Alexander
    Cancienne, Jourdan M.
    Manderle, Brandon J.
    Mehta, Nabil
    Wilk, Kevin E.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2020, 12 (02): : 124 - 131
  • [32] Anterior shoulder stabilization in collision athletes - Arthroscopic versus open bankart repair
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    Ha, Jeong n Ha
    Cho, Nam Su
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (06): : 979 - 985
  • [33] Functional outcome after open and arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic shoulder instability
    J. Lützner
    F. Krummenauer
    J. Lübke
    S. Kirschner
    K.-P. Günther
    M. Bottesi
    European Journal of Medical Research, 14 (1)
  • [34] Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: Open versus arthroscopic technique
    Kim, SH
    Ha, KI
    Kim, SH
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (07): : 755 - 763
  • [35] FUCTIONAL OUTCOME AFTER OPEN AND ARTHROSCOPIC BANKART REPAIR FOR TRAUMATIC SHOULDER INSTABILITY
    Luetzner, J.
    Krummenauer, F.
    Luebke, J.
    Kirschner, S.
    Guenther, K. -P.
    Bottesi, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 14 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [36] Management of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair versus Latarjet procedure
    Cho, Nam Su
    Yoo, Jae Hyun
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (12) : 3793 - 3800
  • [37] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport
    Blonna, Davide
    Bellato, Enrico
    Caranzano, Francesco
    Assom, Marco
    Rossi, Roberto
    Castoldi, Filippo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12): : 3198 - 3205
  • [38] The arthroscopic latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability
    Lafosse, Laurent
    Lejeune, Etienne
    Bouchard, Antoine
    Kakuda, Carlos
    Gobezie, Reuben
    Kochhar, Tony
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (11): : 1242.e1 - 1242.e5
  • [39] Comparative analysis of the open and the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure
    Holovakha, M. L.
    Shchokin, O., V
    Kuznietsov, B. A.
    ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 22 (06) : 799 - 803
  • [40] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Open Bristow Procedure in the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Osseous Glenoid Lesions in Collision Athletes
    Tasaki, Atsushi
    Morita, Wataru
    Nozaki, Taiki
    Yonekura, Yuki
    Saito, Masayoshi
    Phillips, Barry B.
    Kitamura, Nobuto
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (05)