The Open Latarjet Procedure Is More Reliable in Terms of Shoulder Stability Than Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

被引:187
|
作者
Bessiere, Charles [1 ]
Trojani, Christophe [1 ]
Carles, Michel [1 ]
Mehta, Saurabh S. [1 ]
Boileau, Pascal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nice Sophia Antipolis, Hop Archet, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Sports Traumatol, F-06202 Nice, France
关键词
ANTERIOR CORACOID ABUTMENTS; HILL-SACHS REMPLISSAGE; GLENOID BONE LOSS; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BRISTOW-LATARJET; INSTABILITY; STABILIZATION; LESIONS; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-014-3550-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet bone block procedure are widely considered mainstays for surgical treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The choice between these procedures depends mainly on surgeon preference or training rather than published evidence. We compared patients with recurrent posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart or open Latarjet procedure in terms of (1) frequency and timing of recurrent instability, (2) risk factors for recurrent instability, and (3) patient-reported outcomes. In this retrospective comparative study, we paired 93 patients undergoing open Latarjet procedures with 93 patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repairs over the same period for posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability by one of four surgeons at the same center. Both groups were comparable except that patients in the Latarjet group had more glenoid lesions and more instability episodes preoperatively. Minimum followup was 4 years (mean, 6 years; range, 4-10 years). Patients were assessed with a questionnaire, including stability, Rowe score, and return to sports. Recurrent instability was defined as at least one episode of recurrent dislocation or subluxation. Return to sports was evaluated using a 0% to 100% scale that patients completed after recovery from surgery. Various risk factors for recurrent instability were also analyzed. At latest followup, 10% (nine of 93) in the Latarjet group and 22% (20 of 93) in the Bankart group demonstrated recurrent instability (p = 0.026; odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.91). Ten recurrences in the Bankart group (50%) occurred after 2 years, compared to only one (11%) in the Latarjet group. Reoperation rate was 6% and 7% in the Bankart and Latarjet groups, respectively. In both groups, patients younger than 20 years had higher recurrence risk (p = 0.019). In the Bankart group, independent factors predictive for recurrence were practice of competitive sports and shoulder hyperlaxity (ie, passive external rotation > 85A degrees in the contralateral uninjured shoulder). Although return to sports was not different between groups, the mean Rowe score was higher in the Latarjet group (78 versus 68, p = 0.018). Patients who had the open Latarjet procedure had less recurrent instability and better Rowe scores over a mean 6-year followup. We now perform isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair for carefully selected patients, including patients with an Instability Severity Index Score of 3 or less. Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:2345 / 2351
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chronic anterior shoulder instability with significant Hill-Sachs lesion: Arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage versus open Latarjet procedure
    Bah, A.
    Lateur, G. M.
    Kouevidjin, B. T.
    Bassinga, J. Y. S.
    Issa, M.
    Jaafar, A.
    Beaudouin, E.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [22] Comparison of Return to Sports and Competition After the Arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet Procedure Versus Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Adolescents With Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Rosello, Olivier
    Barret, Hugo
    Langlais, Tristan
    Boileau, Pascal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (06): : 1457 - 1463
  • [23] Arthroscopic versus open bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability
    Cole, BJ
    Warner, JJP
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (01) : 19 - +
  • [24] Previous arthroscopic Bankart repair is an independent risk factor for an inferior outcome after Latarjet procedure
    Flinkkila, Tapio
    Knape, Rony
    Nevalainen, Mika
    Sirnio, Kai
    Ohtonen, Pasi
    Leppilahti, Juhana
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2019, 105 (08) : 1481 - 1485
  • [25] Management of an engaging Hill–Sachs lesion: arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair versus Latarjet procedure
    Nam Su Cho
    Jae Hyun Yoo
    Yong Girl Rhee
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 3793 - 3800
  • [26] Long-Term Results of Bankart Repair and Latarjet Procedure for Treatment of Recurrent Shoulder Instability
    Zimmermann, Stefan
    Scheyerer, Max Joseph
    Pietsch, Christiane
    Gerber, Christian
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2014, 144 : 31S - 31S
  • [27] Biomechanical Effectiveness of an Arthroscopic Posterior Bankart Repair Versus an Open Bone Block Procedure for Posterior Shoulder Instability
    Wellmann, Mathias
    Bobrowitsch, Evgenij
    Khan, Nicklas
    Patzer, Thilo
    Windhagen, Henning
    Petersen, Wolf
    Bohnsack, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (04): : 796 - 803
  • [28] Borderline Glenoid Bone Defect in Anterior Shoulder Instability Latarjet Procedure Versus Bankart Repair
    Jeon, Yoon Sang
    Jeong, Ho Yeon
    Lee, Dong Ki
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (09): : 2170 - 2176
  • [29] Arthroscopic Latarjet Stabilization of the Shoulder With Capsulolabral Repair
    Cutbush, Kenneth
    Hirpara, Kieran M.
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 16 (03): : 85 - 88
  • [30] Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet as a Revision Surgery After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    Calvo, Emilio
    Dzidzishvili, Lika
    Valencia, Maria
    Calvo, Claudio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (01): : 190 - 200