An operational evaluation of the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model

被引:107
|
作者
Eder, Brian [1 ]
Kang, Daiwen [1 ]
Mathur, Rohit [1 ]
Yu, Shaocai [1 ]
Schere, Ken [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, ARL, ASMD, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
air quality forecasting; ozone; model evaluation; Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model; Eta model;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.062
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), in partnership with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), are developing an operational, nationwide Air Quality Forecasting (AQF) system. An experimental phase of this program, which couples NOAA's Eta meteorological model with EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, began operation in June of 2004 and has been providing forecasts of ozone (O-3) concentrations over the northeastern United States. An important component of this AQF system has been the development and implementation of an evaluation protocol. Accordingly, a suite of statistical metrics that facilitates evaluation of both discrete- and categorical-type forecasts was developed and applied to the system in order to characterize its performance. The results reveal that the AQF system performed reasonably well in this inaugural season (mean domain wide correlation coefficient = 0.59), despite anomalously cool and wet conditions that were not conducive to the formation Of O-3. Due in part to these conditions the AQF system overpredicted concentrations, resulting in a mean bias of + 10.2 ppb (normalized mean bias = + 22.8%). In terms of error, the domain-wide root mean square error averaged 15.7 ppb (normalized mean error = 28.1%) for the period. Examination of the discrete and categorical metrics on a daily basis revealed that the AQF system's level of performance was closely related to the synoptic-scale meteorology impacting the domain. The model performed very well during periods when anticyclones, characterized by clear skies, dominated. Conversely, periods characterized by extensive cloud associated with fronts and/or cyclones, resulted in poor model performance. Subsequent analysis revealed that factors associated with CMAQ's cloud cover scheme contributed to this overprediction. Accordingly, changes to the cloud schemes are currently underway that are expected to significantly improve the AQF system's performance in anticipation of its second year of operation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4894 / 4905
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] OPERATIONAL EVALUATION OF A TURBULENCE CLOSURE-MODEL FORECAST SYSTEM
    BURK, SD
    THOMPSON, WT
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1982, 110 (11) : 1535 - 1543
  • [32] An improved grey model for urban air quality forecast
    Huang, Yuan (757918272@qq.com), 1600, ICIC Express Letters Office (07):
  • [33] Overview and Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Version 5.2
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Napelenok, Sergey
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Pouliot, George
    Foley, Kristen M.
    Roselle, Shawn J.
    Pleim, Jonathan E.
    Bash, Jesse
    Pye, Havala O. T.
    Heath, Nicholas
    Murphy, Benjamin
    Mathur, Rohit
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XXV, 2018, : 69 - 73
  • [34] Evaluation of the impacts of straw burning ban on air quality based on WRF-CMAQ
    Du, Ya-Bin
    Zhao, Hong-Mei
    Zhang, Xue-Lei
    Xiu, Ai-Jun
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2022, 42 (12): : 5578 - 5588
  • [35] Research on quality evaluation of landslide forecast model
    Wang, Zhaoyang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION 2015, 2016, 30 : 546 - 550
  • [36] Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Napelenok, Sergey L.
    Foley, Kristen M.
    Pye, Havala O. T.
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Luecken, Deborah J.
    Bash, Jesse O.
    Roselle, Shawn J.
    Pleim, Jonathan E.
    Foroutan, Hosein
    Hutzell, William T.
    Pouliot, George A.
    Sarwar, Golam
    Fahey, Kathleen M.
    Gantt, Brett
    Gilliam, Robert C.
    Heath, Nicholas K.
    Kang, Daiwen
    Mathur, Rohit
    Schwede, Donna B.
    Spero, Tanya L.
    Wong, David C.
    Young, Jeffrey O.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 10 (04) : 1703 - 1732
  • [37] Evaluation of the community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model version 4.5: Sensitivities impacting model performance; Part II - particulate matter
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Bhave, Prakash V.
    Gilliland, Alice B.
    Sarwar, Golam
    Roselle, Shawn J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (24) : 6057 - 6066
  • [38] Study of statistically correcting model CMAQ-MOS for forecasting regional air quality
    Xu, JM
    Xu, XD
    Liu, Y
    Ding, GA
    Chen, HL
    Hij, JK
    Zhang, JC
    Wu, H
    Li, WL
    He, JH
    Yang, YQ
    Wang, JH
    SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES D-EARTH SCIENCES, 2005, 48 : 155 - 172
  • [39] Application of a statistical post-processing technique to a gridded, operational, air quality forecast
    Neal, L. S.
    Agnew, P.
    Moseley, S.
    Ordonez, C.
    Savage, N. H.
    Tilbee, M.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 98 : 385 - 393
  • [40] Diagnostic Evaluation of NOx Emission Upgrade on Air Quality Forecast
    Pan, Li
    Tong, Daniel
    Lee, Pius
    Kim, Hyuncheol
    Chai, Tianfeng
    Ding, Charles
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XXIII, 2014, : 511 - 517