An operational evaluation of the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model

被引:107
|
作者
Eder, Brian [1 ]
Kang, Daiwen [1 ]
Mathur, Rohit [1 ]
Yu, Shaocai [1 ]
Schere, Ken [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, ARL, ASMD, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
air quality forecasting; ozone; model evaluation; Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model; Eta model;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.062
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), in partnership with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), are developing an operational, nationwide Air Quality Forecasting (AQF) system. An experimental phase of this program, which couples NOAA's Eta meteorological model with EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, began operation in June of 2004 and has been providing forecasts of ozone (O-3) concentrations over the northeastern United States. An important component of this AQF system has been the development and implementation of an evaluation protocol. Accordingly, a suite of statistical metrics that facilitates evaluation of both discrete- and categorical-type forecasts was developed and applied to the system in order to characterize its performance. The results reveal that the AQF system performed reasonably well in this inaugural season (mean domain wide correlation coefficient = 0.59), despite anomalously cool and wet conditions that were not conducive to the formation Of O-3. Due in part to these conditions the AQF system overpredicted concentrations, resulting in a mean bias of + 10.2 ppb (normalized mean bias = + 22.8%). In terms of error, the domain-wide root mean square error averaged 15.7 ppb (normalized mean error = 28.1%) for the period. Examination of the discrete and categorical metrics on a daily basis revealed that the AQF system's level of performance was closely related to the synoptic-scale meteorology impacting the domain. The model performed very well during periods when anticyclones, characterized by clear skies, dominated. Conversely, periods characterized by extensive cloud associated with fronts and/or cyclones, resulted in poor model performance. Subsequent analysis revealed that factors associated with CMAQ's cloud cover scheme contributed to this overprediction. Accordingly, changes to the cloud schemes are currently underway that are expected to significantly improve the AQF system's performance in anticipation of its second year of operation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4894 / 4905
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Air quality forecast of PM10 in Beijing with Community Multi-scale Air Quality Modeling (CMAQ) system: emission and improvement
    Wu, Q.
    Xu, W.
    Shi, A.
    Li, Y.
    Zhao, X.
    Wang, Z.
    Li, J.
    Wang, L.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 7 (05) : 2243 - 2259
  • [22] Evaluation of an operational air quality model using large-eddy simulation
    Grylls, Tom
    Le Cornec, Clemence M. A.
    Salizzoni, Pietro
    Soulhac, Lionel
    Stettler, Marc E. J.
    van Reeuwijk, Maarten
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT-X, 2019, 3
  • [23] Operational Evaluation of a Wildfire Air Quality Model from a Forecaster Point of View
    Ainslie, Bruce
    So, Rita
    Chen, Jack
    WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2022, 37 (05) : 681 - 698
  • [24] A real-time operational forecast model for meteorology and air quality during peak air pollution episodes in Oslo, Norway
    Berge, E
    Walker, SE
    Sorteberg, A
    Lenkopane, M
    Eastwood, S
    Jablonska, HI
    Koltzow, MO
    URBAN AIR QUALITY - RECENT ADVANCES, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 745 - 757
  • [25] Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0
    Appel, K. W.
    Pouliot, G. A.
    Simon, H.
    Sarwar, G.
    Pye, H. O. T.
    Napelenok, S. L.
    Akhtar, F.
    Roselle, S. J.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (04) : 883 - 899
  • [26] Performance and diagnostic evaluation of ozone predictions by the eta-community multiscale air quality forecast system during the 2002 New England Air Quality Study
    Yu, Shaocai
    Mathur, Rohit
    Kang, Daiwen
    Schere, Kenneth
    Eder, Brian
    Pleirn, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2006, 56 (10) : 1459 - 1471
  • [27] Evaluation of the NCEP mesoscale Eta Model convective boundary layer for air quality applications
    Angevine, WM
    Mitchell, K
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2001, 129 (11) : 2761 - 2775
  • [28] A comparative performance evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ air-quality modelling systems
    Smyth, Steven C.
    Jiang, Weimin
    Roth, Helmut
    Moran, Michael D.
    Makar, Paul A.
    Yang, Fuquan
    Bouchet, Veronique S.
    Landry, Hugo
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (05) : 1059 - 1070
  • [29] European operational air quality forecasting system by using MM5-CMAQ-EMIMO tool
    Jose, R. San
    Perez, Juan L.
    Morant, Jose L.
    Gonzalez, Rosa M.
    SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2008, 16 (10) : 1534 - 1540
  • [30] Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 4.5: Sensitivities impacting model performance Part I - Ozone
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Gilliland, Alice B.
    Sarwar, Golam
    Gilliam, Robert C.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (40) : 9603 - 9615