Building customer complaint ontology: Using OWL to express semantic relations

被引:0
|
作者
Yan Yalan [1 ]
Zhang Jinlong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
customer complaint ontology; framework; OWL; semantic relations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Customer complaint is an important kind of information coming from customers and it is a primary measure of customer dissatisfaction. In order that complaint information could be. understood and processed by machine automatically, more semantic descriptions are needed. Ontology has become a promising technology to express semantics and OWL (Ontology Web Language) has the ability to express semantic relations in building complaint ontology. In this paper, we put forward a framework of customer complaint ontology after considering capabilities to express semantic relations provided by OWL. Then we use Protege-2000 to build OWL representations of the customer complaint ontology and make some analyses. Our exploration might not standardize customer complaint ontology. We explore with the intention to help people better understand the rationality in expressing concepts and relations between the concepts in customer complaint management in order that OWL customer complaint ontology and other domain ontology are improved and standardized as soon as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 437
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Semantic Model for Building Integrated Ontology Databases
    Babu, M. Surendra Prasad
    Govathoti, Sudeepthi
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND SERVICE SCIENCE (ICSESS 2016), 2016, : 595 - 598
  • [42] Toolkits for ontology building and semantic annotation in UDMGrid
    Chen, XW
    Luo, XX
    Ou, HF
    Chen, MJ
    Xiao, H
    Zhang, P
    Cheng, F
    ADVANCED WEB AND NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES, AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 3842 : 486 - 495
  • [43] Sensor Ontology Building in Semantic Sensor Web
    Shi, Yimin
    Li, Guanyu
    Zhou, Xiaoping
    Zhang, Xianzhong
    INTERNET OF THINGS-BK, 2012, 312 : 277 - 284
  • [44] Automatic Topic Ontology Construction Using Semantic Relations from WordNet and Wikipedia
    Subramaniyaswamy, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 9 (03) : 61 - 89
  • [45] Ontology-driven relational query formulation using the semantic and assertional capabilities of OWL-DL
    Munir, K.
    Odeh, M.
    McClatchey, R.
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2012, 35 : 144 - 159
  • [46] Semantic Enrichment of Building and Construction Knowledge Sources using a Domain Ontology for Classification
    Costa, Ruben
    Lima, Celson
    Sarraipa, Joao
    Jardim-Goncalves, Ricardo
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2013, PTS 1 AND 2 (ICNAAM 2013), 2013, 1558 : 1381 - 1384
  • [47] Towards building semantic rich model for web documents using domain ontology
    Noah, SA
    Zakaria, L
    Alhadi, AC
    Sembok, TMT
    Saad, S
    IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE (WI 2004), PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 769 - 770
  • [48] Fuzzy ontology representation using OWL 2
    Bobillo, Fernando
    Straccia, Umberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2011, 52 (07) : 1073 - 1094
  • [49] A semantic similarity-based method to support the conversion from EXPRESS to OWL
    Liu, Yan
    Jian, Qingquan
    Eckert, Claudia M.
    AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, 2023, 37
  • [50] Using Selectional Restrictions to Query an OWL Ontology
    Kosseim, Leila
    Siblini, Reda
    Baker, Christopher J. O.
    Bergler, Sabine
    FORMAL ONTOLOGY IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 150 : 360 - 371