Building customer complaint ontology: Using OWL to express semantic relations

被引:0
|
作者
Yan Yalan [1 ]
Zhang Jinlong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
customer complaint ontology; framework; OWL; semantic relations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Customer complaint is an important kind of information coming from customers and it is a primary measure of customer dissatisfaction. In order that complaint information could be. understood and processed by machine automatically, more semantic descriptions are needed. Ontology has become a promising technology to express semantics and OWL (Ontology Web Language) has the ability to express semantic relations in building complaint ontology. In this paper, we put forward a framework of customer complaint ontology after considering capabilities to express semantic relations provided by OWL. Then we use Protege-2000 to build OWL representations of the customer complaint ontology and make some analyses. Our exploration might not standardize customer complaint ontology. We explore with the intention to help people better understand the rationality in expressing concepts and relations between the concepts in customer complaint management in order that OWL customer complaint ontology and other domain ontology are improved and standardized as soon as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 437
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enriching ontology mappings with semantic relations
    Arnold, Patrick
    Rahm, Erhard
    DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 93 : 1 - 18
  • [22] EXPRESS to OWL for construction industry: Towards a recommendable and usable ifcOWL ontology
    Pauwels, Pieter
    Terkaj, Walter
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2016, 63 : 100 - 133
  • [23] UnivPeopleProgram Ontology: A OWL based Structural definition for Semantic Web
    Pandey, Rajiv
    Dwivedi, Sanjay Kr
    Verma, Parul
    2013 IEEE CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT 2013), 2013, : 770 - 775
  • [24] OWL-M extension for semantic representations of ontology alignments
    Lera, Isaac
    Juiz, Carlos
    Puigjaner, Ramon
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX, INTELLIGENT AND SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS (CISIS 2010), 2010, : 956 - 961
  • [25] MoA: OWL ontology merging and alignment tool for the Semantic Web
    Kim, J
    Jang, M
    Ha, YG
    Sohn, JC
    Lee, SJ
    INNOVATIONS IN APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2005, 3533 : 722 - 731
  • [26] PR-OWL: A Bayesian Ontology Language for the Semantic Web
    da Costa, Paulo Cesar G.
    Laskey, Kathryn B.
    Laskey, Kenneth J.
    UNCERTAINTY REASONING FOR THE SEMANTIC WEB I, 2008, 5327 : 88 - +
  • [27] An OWL Ontology for supporting Semantic Services in Big Data platforms
    Redavid, Domenico
    Corizzo, Roberto
    Malerba, Donato
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON BIG DATA (IEEE BIGDATA CONGRESS), 2018, : 228 - 231
  • [28] Ontology gateway - Enabling interoperability between FIPA complaint agents and OWL Web services
    Rehman, Sabih Ur
    Pasha, Maruf
    Ali, Arshad
    Ahmed, Farooq
    Suguri, Hiroki
    ICEIS 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: SOFTWARE AGENTS AND INTERNET COMPUTING, 2007, : 309 - +
  • [29] OWL Manipulation toward Building Semantic Applications and Agents
    Balouchian, Pooyan
    Almassian, Amin
    Elci, Atilla
    2009 IEEE 33RD INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 729 - 734
  • [30] Enriching Semantic Relations of Basic Sciences Ontology
    Ejei, Fatemeh
    Beheshti, Molouk Sadat Hosseini
    Rajabi, Taghi
    Ejehi, Zeinab
    KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 2017, 44 (05): : 318 - 325