Conservation of grassland butterflies in Finland under a changing climate

被引:7
|
作者
Tainio, Anna [1 ]
Heikkinen, Risto K. [2 ]
Heliola, Janne [2 ]
Hunt, Alistair [3 ]
Watkiss, Paul [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Fronzek, Stefan [7 ]
Leikola, Niko [2 ]
Lotjonen, Sanna [8 ]
Mashkina, Olga [1 ]
Carter, Timothy R. [7 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Environm Policy Ctr, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[2] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Nat Environm Ctr, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[3] Univ Bath, Dept Econ, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[4] Paul Watkiss Associates, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford, England
[6] Stockholm Environm Inst, Oxford, England
[7] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Climate Change Programme, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[8] Univ Helsinki, Dept Econ & Management, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Adaptation; Agri-environmental scheme (AES); Ecological corridor; Species translocation; Bioclimatic envelope modelling; Cost-effectiveness analysis; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; ASSISTED COLONIZATION; HABITAT LOSS; RANGE; BIODIVERSITY; DISTRIBUTIONS; DETERMINANTS; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-014-0684-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the potential impact of climate change on grassland butterfly species in Finland. It combines multiple climate change scenarios and different impact models for bioclimatic suitability to capture multi-faceted aspects of uncertainty. It also evaluates alternative options to enhance the adaptation of grassland biodiversity. Due to the long-term decline of semi-natural grasslands, their current extent in Finland is much lower than the minimum level estimated to ensure the survival of butterfly species. Projected locations of the climatically most suitable areas for butterfly species varied considerably between different modelling techniques and climate change scenarios. This uncertainty needs to be taken into account in planning adaptation responses. Analysis of potential adaptation options considered the promotion of existing measures based on the agri-environmental scheme (AES), as well as new measures, including species translocation and dispersal corridors. Current AES options were compared using a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). The CEA results indicated that buffer zones are the most cost-effective AES measure, although environmental fallows and buffer zones had broadly similar cost-effectiveness. The cost of translocation was relatively modest compared to that of dispersal corridors, due to the high number of habitat stepping stones required along potential dispersal corridors. A questionnaire survey of Finnish farmers revealed that a third of the respondents supported increases in nature conservation. Thus, large increases of the uptake of biodiversity-related AES measures among farmers may prove to be difficult. Given the small areas currently assigned for such measures, the prospects for the adaptation of grassland butterflies to climate change in Finland appear unfavourable.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 84
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Forest conservation policy in a changing climate
    Winkel, Georg
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 1 - 5
  • [42] Changing diseases under a changing climate
    Pendrey, Catherine
    Martin, Genevieve
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 52 (05) : 275 - 280
  • [43] Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate
    Suttle, K. B.
    Thomsen, Meredith A.
    Power, Mary E.
    SCIENCE, 2007, 315 (5812) : 640 - 642
  • [44] Grassland seed bank and community resilience in a changing climate
    Kiss, Reka
    Deak, Balazs
    Torok, Peter
    Tothmeresz, Bela
    Valko, Orsolya
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 : S141 - S150
  • [45] Rockiness determines meso-scale conservation of butterflies in Afro-montane grassland
    Crous, Casparus J.
    Samways, Michael J.
    Pryke, James S.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2014, 18 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [46] Rockiness determines meso-scale conservation of butterflies in Afro-montane grassland
    Casparus J. Crous
    Michael J. Samways
    James S. Pryke
    Journal of Insect Conservation, 2014, 18 : 77 - 83
  • [47] Machine Learning for Conservation Planning in a Changing Climate
    Mosebo Fernandes, Ana Cristina
    Quintero Gonzalez, Rebeca
    Lenihan-Clarke, Marie Ann
    Leslie Trotter, Ezra Francis
    Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [48] Beyond Predictions: Biodiversity Conservation in a Changing Climate
    Dawson, Terence P.
    Jackson, Stephen T.
    House, Joanna I.
    Prentice, Iain Colin
    Mace, Georgina M.
    SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6025) : 53 - 58
  • [49] Biogeographic constraints to marine conservation in a changing climate
    Fredston-Hermann, Alexa
    Gaines, Steven D.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2018, 1429 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [50] The relationship between butterflies and environmental indicator values: a tool for conservation in a changing landscape
    Oostermeijer, JGB
    van Swaay, CAM
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 86 (03) : 271 - 280