Conservation of grassland butterflies in Finland under a changing climate

被引:7
|
作者
Tainio, Anna [1 ]
Heikkinen, Risto K. [2 ]
Heliola, Janne [2 ]
Hunt, Alistair [3 ]
Watkiss, Paul [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Fronzek, Stefan [7 ]
Leikola, Niko [2 ]
Lotjonen, Sanna [8 ]
Mashkina, Olga [1 ]
Carter, Timothy R. [7 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Environm Policy Ctr, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[2] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Nat Environm Ctr, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[3] Univ Bath, Dept Econ, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[4] Paul Watkiss Associates, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford, England
[6] Stockholm Environm Inst, Oxford, England
[7] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Climate Change Programme, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[8] Univ Helsinki, Dept Econ & Management, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Adaptation; Agri-environmental scheme (AES); Ecological corridor; Species translocation; Bioclimatic envelope modelling; Cost-effectiveness analysis; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; ASSISTED COLONIZATION; HABITAT LOSS; RANGE; BIODIVERSITY; DISTRIBUTIONS; DETERMINANTS; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-014-0684-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the potential impact of climate change on grassland butterfly species in Finland. It combines multiple climate change scenarios and different impact models for bioclimatic suitability to capture multi-faceted aspects of uncertainty. It also evaluates alternative options to enhance the adaptation of grassland biodiversity. Due to the long-term decline of semi-natural grasslands, their current extent in Finland is much lower than the minimum level estimated to ensure the survival of butterfly species. Projected locations of the climatically most suitable areas for butterfly species varied considerably between different modelling techniques and climate change scenarios. This uncertainty needs to be taken into account in planning adaptation responses. Analysis of potential adaptation options considered the promotion of existing measures based on the agri-environmental scheme (AES), as well as new measures, including species translocation and dispersal corridors. Current AES options were compared using a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). The CEA results indicated that buffer zones are the most cost-effective AES measure, although environmental fallows and buffer zones had broadly similar cost-effectiveness. The cost of translocation was relatively modest compared to that of dispersal corridors, due to the high number of habitat stepping stones required along potential dispersal corridors. A questionnaire survey of Finnish farmers revealed that a third of the respondents supported increases in nature conservation. Thus, large increases of the uptake of biodiversity-related AES measures among farmers may prove to be difficult. Given the small areas currently assigned for such measures, the prospects for the adaptation of grassland butterflies to climate change in Finland appear unfavourable.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 84
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Beguiling and risky: ‘environmental works and measures’ for wetland conservation under a changing climate
    Jamie Pittock
    C. Max Finlayson
    Julia Howitt
    Hydrobiologia, 2013, 708 : 111 - 131
  • [32] Soil microbiome: a key player for conservation of soil health under changing climate
    Anamika Dubey
    Muneer Ahmad Malla
    Farhat Khan
    Kanika Chowdhary
    Shweta Yadav
    Ashwani Kumar
    Satyawati Sharma
    Pramod K. Khare
    Mohammad Latif Khan
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2019, 28 : 2405 - 2429
  • [33] Governance of forest conservation and co-benefits for Bangladesh under changing climate
    Ronju Ahammad
    Mohammed Kamal
    Panna Husnain
    JournalofForestryResearch, 2014, 25 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [34] Beguiling and risky: 'environmental works and measures' for wetland conservation under a changing climate
    Pittock, Jamie
    Finlayson, C. Max
    Howitt, Julia
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2013, 708 (01) : 111 - 131
  • [35] Soil microbiome: a key player for conservation of soil health under changing climate
    Dubey, Anamika
    Malla, Muneer Ahmad
    Khan, Farhat
    Chowdhary, Kanika
    Yadav, Shweta
    Kumar, Ashwani
    Sharma, Satyawati
    Khare, Pramod K.
    Khan, Mohammad Latif
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 28 (8-9) : 2405 - 2429
  • [36] Governance of forest conservation and co-benefits for Bangladesh under changing climate
    Ronju Ahammad
    Mohammed Kamal Hossain
    Panna Husnain
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2014, 25 : 29 - 36
  • [37] Governance of forest conservation and co-benefits for Bangladesh under changing climate
    Ahammad, Ronju
    Hossain, Mohammed Kamal
    Husnain, Panna
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [38] Assessment of Groundwater Quality under Changing Climate in Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania
    Mwabumba, Mohamed
    Jahangeer, Jahangeer
    Beegum, Sahila
    Yadav, Brijesh K.
    Rwiza, Mwemezi J.
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (10)
  • [39] Assessing the impacts of agricultural conservation practices on freshwater biodiversity under changing climate
    Triana, Juan S. Acero
    Chu, Maria L.
    Stein, Jeffrey A.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2021, 453
  • [40] Reassessing Conservation Goals in a Changing Climate
    Camacho, Alejandro E.
    Doremus, Holly
    McLachlan, Jason S.
    Minteer, Ben A.
    ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 26 (04) : 21 - 26