Life cycle assessment of peach transportation considering trade-off between food loss and environmental impact

被引:15
|
作者
Sasaki, Yuma [1 ,2 ]
Orikasa, Takahiro [1 ,3 ]
Nakamura, Nobutaka [4 ]
Hayashi, Kiyotada [2 ]
Yasaka, Yoshihito [5 ]
Makino, Naoki [5 ]
Shobatake, Koichi [5 ]
Koide, Shoji [1 ]
Shiina, Takeo [6 ]
机构
[1] Iwate Univ, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, Div Reg Dev & Creat, 3-18-8 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 0208550, Japan
[2] NARO, Inst Agroenvironm Sci, 3-1-3 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058604, Japan
[3] Iwate Univ, Agriinnovat Ctr, 3-18-8 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 0208550, Japan
[4] NARO, Food Res Inst, 2-1-12 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058642, Japan
[5] TCO2 Co Ltd, Chiyoda Ku, 602 Bancho Royal Court,23-2 Ichiban Cho, Tokyo 1020082, Japan
[6] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Hort, Matsudo, Chiba 2718510, Japan
来源
关键词
Packaging; Damage area ratio; Life cycle assessment; Peach; Transportation; Hot spot analysis; CONSUMPTION; WASTE;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-020-01832-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose We evaluated the environmental impacts of the peach transportation process using life cycle assessment with the damage area ratio as an indicator to assess both food loss and the environmental burden. A hot spot analysis was also conducted to identify the most relevant impact categories and processes in the peach life cycle. Methods The environmental burden of the peach life cycle was assessed by using a mass-based functional unit (kg of undamaged peaches). The environmental impact of the packaging scenario (using plastic packaging and cardboard during transportation) in the peach life cycle was compared with that of the nonpackaging scenario (using cardboard only). Vibration tests for transportation were performed for several transportation distances to determine the damage area ratios. An impact assessment of the characterization and a calculation of single score results were followed by LIME2, and 15 impact categories were investigated. Results and discussion The packaging scenario had lower environmental impacts than the nonpackaging scenario, and the climate change (CC), resource consumption (RC), and urban air pollution (UAP) impacts in the packaging scenario were reduced by up to 94.1% compared with those in the nonpackaging scenario. Packaging decreased food losses related to injury during transportation; in turn, it also mitigated the environmental burden of additional peach cultivation to compensate for food losses. The results of the hot spot analysis indicated that cultivation, package production, peach waste (due to food loss), and transportation from a fruit sorting facility to the wholesale market stage largely formed the life cycle, with the cultivation stage accounting for the largest portion of the cycle (contribution ratios 36.4 to 89.4%). Conclusion This study shows that packaging can potentially reduce the environmental impacts of peach production; notably, using packaging for peaches effectively decreases the environmental burden of the peach life cycle. This finding suggests that considering the trade-offs between food loss and the environmental burden associated with the peach life cycle is important for achieving a sustainable postharvest process for peaches from an environmental perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 837
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of peach transportation considering trade-off between food loss and environmental impact
    Yuma Sasaki
    Takahiro Orikasa
    Nobutaka Nakamura
    Kiyotada Hayashi
    Yoshihito Yasaka
    Naoki Makino
    Koichi Shobatake
    Shoji Koide
    Takeo Shiina
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 822 - 837
  • [2] Life cycle impact assessment of lead-free solder considering the trade-off relationship between toxic impact and other impact categories
    Itsubo, N
    Noh, J
    Inaba, A
    MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS, 2004, 45 (11) : 3194 - 3200
  • [3] Quantifying the Trade-off between Parameter and Model Structure Uncertainty in Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    van Zelm, Rosalie
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (16) : 9274 - 9280
  • [4] A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact
    Mariam Ameli
    Saeed Mansour
    Amir Ahmadi-Javid
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2017, 19 : 2443 - 2456
  • [5] A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact
    Ameli, Mariam
    Mansour, Saeed
    Ahmadi-Javid, Amir
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 19 (06) : 2443 - 2456
  • [6] Comprehensive assessment method for building environmental performance: Trade-off between indoor environmental quality and life cycle carbon emissions
    Dong, Zhao
    Luo, Xiaoyu
    Zhao, Kang
    Ge, Jian
    Chan, Isabelle Y. S.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 272
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of environmental impact of disposable drinking straws: A trade-off analysis with marine litter in the United States
    Gao, Angela L.
    Wan, Yongshan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 817
  • [8] Impact of shelf life on the trade-off between economic and environmental objectives: A dairy case
    Stefansdottir, Bryndis
    Depping, Verena
    Grunow, Martin
    Kulozik, Ulrich
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2018, 201 : 136 - 148
  • [9] TRADE-OFF CHARACTERIZATION BETWEEN SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS USING AGENT-BASED MODELS AND LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    Liechty, Joseph C.
    Mabey, Christopher S.
    Mattson, Christopher A.
    Salmon, John L.
    Weaver, Jason M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2022, VOL 5, 2022,
  • [10] QUALITY OF LIFE AND THE TRADE-OFF BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES AND TOURISM RATE
    Sergo, Zdravko
    Grzinic, Jasmina
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD 2018): 35TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, 2018, : 756 - 765