Comprehensive assessment method for building environmental performance: Trade-off between indoor environmental quality and life cycle carbon emissions

被引:0
|
作者
Dong, Zhao [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Luo, Xiaoyu [1 ,3 ]
Zhao, Kang [1 ,3 ]
Ge, Jian [1 ,3 ]
Chan, Isabelle Y. S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Balance Architecture, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ Co Ltd, Architectural Design & Res Inst, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Architecture, Dept Real Estate & Construct, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Indoor environmental quality; Life cycle; Carbon emissions; Assessment method; Building environmental performance; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; USER SATISFACTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; HEALTH; IEQ;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112598
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) significantly influences occupants' comfort and health, yet enhancing IEQ often leads to higher carbon emissions, exacerbating global warming. Striking a trade-off between IEQ and carbon emissions without sacrificing human well-being remains challenging. However, most studies focused on either IEQ or carbon emissions, lacking an integrated approach. To address this gap, a comprehensive assessment method was proposed to evaluate a building's environmental performance by considering both aspects simultaneously. This method assessed IEQ through a holistic approach, considering physical factors (thermal environment, air quality, lighting, and acoustics) and non-physical factors (personal environmental control, space design as well as maintenance and cleanliness). Both subjective data (questionnaires) and objective data (on-site equipment measurements) were collected. Carbon emissions were assessed from a life cycle perspective and contextualized by comparing them to emissions from similar buildings in the region, accounting for regional differences and building types. By integrating these assessments, the building carbon emission efficiency (BCEE) metric was introduced, which measured overall environmental performance. Data from case buildings in the Yangtze River Delta region of China were analyzed. The BCEE values for these buildings were determined to be 1.10 for O1, 1.16 for O2, 0.86 for O3, and 1.58 for O4. Based on these values, O1 and O2 were categorized as Grade C, while O3 was classified as Grade D and O4 as Grade B. The method's advantages are clarified through comparisons with other assessment methods. The approach offers valuable guidance for designing highperformance buildings with high IEQ and low carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QUALITY OF LIFE AND THE TRADE-OFF BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES AND TOURISM RATE
    Sergo, Zdravko
    Grzinic, Jasmina
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD 2018): 35TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, 2018, : 756 - 765
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of peach transportation considering trade-off between food loss and environmental impact
    Yuma Sasaki
    Takahiro Orikasa
    Nobutaka Nakamura
    Kiyotada Hayashi
    Yoshihito Yasaka
    Naoki Makino
    Koichi Shobatake
    Shoji Koide
    Takeo Shiina
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 822 - 837
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of peach transportation considering trade-off between food loss and environmental impact
    Sasaki, Yuma
    Orikasa, Takahiro
    Nakamura, Nobutaka
    Hayashi, Kiyotada
    Yasaka, Yoshihito
    Makino, Naoki
    Shobatake, Koichi
    Koide, Shoji
    Shiina, Takeo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (04): : 822 - 837
  • [4] A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact
    Mariam Ameli
    Saeed Mansour
    Amir Ahmadi-Javid
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2017, 19 : 2443 - 2456
  • [5] A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact
    Ameli, Mariam
    Mansour, Saeed
    Ahmadi-Javid, Amir
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 19 (06) : 2443 - 2456
  • [6] Integrated assessment method for building life cycle environmental and economic performance
    Lijing Gu
    Borong Lin
    Yingxin Zhu
    Daojin Gu
    Mingxing Huang
    Jiazi Gai
    Building Simulation, 2008, 1 : 169 - 177
  • [7] Integrated Assessment Method for Building Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Performance
    Gu, Lijing
    Lin, Borong
    Zhu, Yingxin
    Gu, Daojin
    Huang, Mingxing
    Gai, Jiazi
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2008, 1 (02) : 169 - 177
  • [8] Carbon emissions reduction and tax evasion behaviour: a trade-off between environmental goals and economic feasibility
    Yamen, Ahmed
    Mersni, Hounaida
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2024, 22 (01) : 131 - 146
  • [9] TRADE-OFF CHARACTERIZATION BETWEEN SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS USING AGENT-BASED MODELS AND LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    Liechty, Joseph C.
    Mabey, Christopher S.
    Mattson, Christopher A.
    Salmon, John L.
    Weaver, Jason M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2022, VOL 5, 2022,
  • [10] EcoHestia: A comprehensive building environmental assessment scheme, based on Life Cycle Assessment
    Kylili, Angeliki
    Fokaides, Paris A.
    SUSTAINABLE SYNERGIES FROM BUILDINGS TO THE URBAN SCALE, 2017, 38 : 515 - 521