Life cycle assessment of peach transportation considering trade-off between food loss and environmental impact

被引:15
|
作者
Sasaki, Yuma [1 ,2 ]
Orikasa, Takahiro [1 ,3 ]
Nakamura, Nobutaka [4 ]
Hayashi, Kiyotada [2 ]
Yasaka, Yoshihito [5 ]
Makino, Naoki [5 ]
Shobatake, Koichi [5 ]
Koide, Shoji [1 ]
Shiina, Takeo [6 ]
机构
[1] Iwate Univ, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, Div Reg Dev & Creat, 3-18-8 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 0208550, Japan
[2] NARO, Inst Agroenvironm Sci, 3-1-3 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058604, Japan
[3] Iwate Univ, Agriinnovat Ctr, 3-18-8 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 0208550, Japan
[4] NARO, Food Res Inst, 2-1-12 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058642, Japan
[5] TCO2 Co Ltd, Chiyoda Ku, 602 Bancho Royal Court,23-2 Ichiban Cho, Tokyo 1020082, Japan
[6] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Hort, Matsudo, Chiba 2718510, Japan
来源
关键词
Packaging; Damage area ratio; Life cycle assessment; Peach; Transportation; Hot spot analysis; CONSUMPTION; WASTE;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-020-01832-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose We evaluated the environmental impacts of the peach transportation process using life cycle assessment with the damage area ratio as an indicator to assess both food loss and the environmental burden. A hot spot analysis was also conducted to identify the most relevant impact categories and processes in the peach life cycle. Methods The environmental burden of the peach life cycle was assessed by using a mass-based functional unit (kg of undamaged peaches). The environmental impact of the packaging scenario (using plastic packaging and cardboard during transportation) in the peach life cycle was compared with that of the nonpackaging scenario (using cardboard only). Vibration tests for transportation were performed for several transportation distances to determine the damage area ratios. An impact assessment of the characterization and a calculation of single score results were followed by LIME2, and 15 impact categories were investigated. Results and discussion The packaging scenario had lower environmental impacts than the nonpackaging scenario, and the climate change (CC), resource consumption (RC), and urban air pollution (UAP) impacts in the packaging scenario were reduced by up to 94.1% compared with those in the nonpackaging scenario. Packaging decreased food losses related to injury during transportation; in turn, it also mitigated the environmental burden of additional peach cultivation to compensate for food losses. The results of the hot spot analysis indicated that cultivation, package production, peach waste (due to food loss), and transportation from a fruit sorting facility to the wholesale market stage largely formed the life cycle, with the cultivation stage accounting for the largest portion of the cycle (contribution ratios 36.4 to 89.4%). Conclusion This study shows that packaging can potentially reduce the environmental impacts of peach production; notably, using packaging for peaches effectively decreases the environmental burden of the peach life cycle. This finding suggests that considering the trade-offs between food loss and the environmental burden associated with the peach life cycle is important for achieving a sustainable postharvest process for peaches from an environmental perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 837
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Classroom Exercise to Examine the Trade-off between Mission Capacity and Life Cycle Cost
    Kang, Keebom
    Doerr, Kenneth H.
    DECISION SCIENCES-JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION, 2015, 13 (01) : 3 - 20
  • [22] Determination of the most environmentally friendly packaging for peach during transportation by modeling the relationship between food loss reduction and environmental impact
    Sasaki, Yuma
    Orikasa, Takahiro
    Nakamura, Nobutaka
    Hayashi, Kiyotada
    Yasaka, Yoshihito
    Makino, Naoki
    Shobatake, Koichi
    Koide, Shoji
    Shiina, Takeo
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2022, 331
  • [23] Environmental impact and damage assessment of oil trunkline transportation by life cycle assessment method
    Saedi, Amir hosein
    Aliabadi, Yeganeh
    Ahmadi, Abolfazl
    Mirzavand, Hamed
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (05) : 1855 - 1869
  • [24] Trade-off between the economic and environmental impact of different decarbonisation strategies for residential buildings
    Conci, Mira
    Konstantinou, Thaleia
    van den Dobbelsteen, Andy
    Schneider, Jens
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 155 : 137 - 144
  • [25] OPTIMAL NUMBER OF PLANTS - TRADE-OFF BETWEEN PRODUCTION AND TRANSPORTATION COSTS
    KARNANI, A
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1982, 10 (06): : 705 - 706
  • [26] The impact of central government environmental inspection on the trade-off between economic growth and environmental improvement in China
    Penghao Cheng
    Long Cao
    Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 3 (1):
  • [27] Trade-off for road pricing between transportation performance and financial feasibility
    DeCorla-Souza, P
    FINANCE, ECONOMICS, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2005, 2005, (1932): : 23 - 32
  • [28] Trade-off between PHEV fuel efficiency and estimated battery cycle life with cost analysis
    Shidore, Neeraj
    Kwon, Jason
    Vyas, Anant
    2009 IEEE VEHICLE POWER AND PROPULSION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 596 - 604
  • [29] Is there loss aversion in the trade-off between wages and commuting distances?
    Dauth, Wolfgang
    Haller, Peter
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2020, 83
  • [30] Sustainability evaluation framework for pavement technologies: An integrated life cycle economic and environmental trade-off analysis
    Umer, Adil
    Hewage, Kasun
    Haider, Husnain
    Sadiq, Rehan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 53 : 88 - 101