Clinical implementation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy for liver cancer with forced deep expiration breath hold

被引:10
|
作者
Fracchiolla, Francesco [1 ]
Dionisi, Francesco [1 ]
Righetto, Roberto [1 ]
Widesott, Lamberto [1 ]
Giacomelli, Irene [1 ]
Cartechini, Giorgio [2 ]
Farace, Paolo [1 ]
Bertolini, Mattia [1 ]
Amichetti, Maurizio [1 ]
Schwarz, Marco [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Prov & Serv Sanitari APSS, Protontherapy Dept, Via Al Desert 14, I-38122 Trento, Italy
[2] Univ Trento, Trento, Italy
[3] TIFPA Trento Inst Fundamental Phys & Applicat, Trento, Italy
关键词
Proton therapy; Liver treatments; Interplay effect; Robustness analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.035
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To present our technique for liver cancer treatments with proton therapy in pencil beam scanning mode and to evaluate the impact of uncertainties on plan quality. Materials and Methods: Seventeen patients affected by liver cancer were included in this study. Patients were imaged and treated in forced breath-hold using the Active Breathing Coordinator system and monitored with an optical tracking system. Three simulation CTs were acquired to estimate the anatomical variability between breath-holds and generate an internal target volume (ITV). The treatment plans were optimized with a Single Field Optimization technique aimed at minimizing the use of range shifter. Plan robustness was tested simulating systematic range and setup uncertainties, as well as the interplay effect between breath-holds. The appropriateness of margin was further verified based on the actual positioning data acquired during treatment. Results: The dose distributions of the nominal plans achieved a satisfactory target coverage in 11 out of 17 patients, while in the remaining 6 D95 to the PTV was affected by the constraint on mean liver dose. The constraints for all other organs at risk were always within tolerances. The interplay effect had a limited impact on the dose distributions: the worst case scenario showed a D95 reduction in the ITV < 3.9 GyRBE and no OAR with D-1 > 105% of the prescription dose. The robustness analysis showed that for 13 out of 17 patients the ITV coverage in terms of D95 was better than D95 of the PTV in the nominal plan. For the remaining 4 patients, the maximum difference between ITV D95 and PTV D95 was <= 0.7% even for the largest simulated setup error and it was deemed clinically acceptable. Hot spots in the OARs were always lower than 105% of the prescription dose. Positioning images confirmed that the breath hold technique and the PTV margin were adequate to compensate for inter- and intra-breath-hold variations in liver position. Conclusion: We designed and clinically applied a technique for the treatment of liver cancer with proton pencil beam scanning in forced deep expiration breath-hold. The initial data on plan robustness and patient positioning suggest that the choices in terms of planning technique and treatment margins are able to reach the desired balance between target coverage and organ at risk sparing. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 144
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robust optimization for IMPT of pencil-beam scanning proton therapy for prostate cancer
    Brouwer, C. L.
    Matysiak, W. P.
    Klinker, P.
    Spijkerman-Bergsma, M.
    Hammer, C.
    Van den Bergh, A. C. M.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Scandurra, D.
    Korevaar, E. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S835 - S836
  • [42] Outcomes of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Anal Cancer: A Single Institution Study
    Grandhi, Nikhil
    Mohiuddin, Jahan
    Plastaras, John
    Metz, James M.
    Lukens, John
    Karasic, Thomas
    Reiss-Binder, Kim
    Ben-Josef, Edgar
    Wojcieszynski, Andrzej
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 103 (05): : E9 - E9
  • [43] Robust Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment Planning for Rectal Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Kiely, Janid Patricia Blanco
    White, Benjamin M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 208 - 215
  • [44] Pencil beam scanning versus passively scattered proton therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer
    Chuong, Michael
    Badiyan, Shahed N.
    Yam, Man
    Li, Zuofeng
    Langen, Katja
    Regine, William
    Morris, Christopher
    Snider, James, III
    Mehta, Minesh
    Huh, Soon
    Rutenberg, Michael
    Nichols, Romaine C.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (04) : 687 - 693
  • [45] Dosimetry calculations of gastric cancer treatment during pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Sadrzadeh, S.
    Tajik, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2024, 22 (04):
  • [46] Spot-scanning proton therapy for early breast cancer in free breathing versus deep inspiration breath-hold
    Stick, Line Bjerregaard
    Nielsen, Louise Laerke
    Trinh, Cecilia Bui
    Bahij, Ihsan
    Jensen, Maria Fuglsang
    Kronborg, Camilla Jen- senius Skovhus
    Petersen, Stine Elleberg
    Thai, Linh My Hoang
    Martinsen, May-Lin
    Precht, Helle
    Offersen, Birgitte Vrou
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2024, 63 : 56 - 61
  • [47] Robustness of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Pelvic Cancer Under Anatomical Changes
    Dinges, E.
    Bhatia, S.
    Gross, B.
    McGuire, S.
    Wang, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 552 - 553
  • [48] Impact of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Moteabbed, M.
    Trofimov, A.
    Sharp, G.
    Wang, Y.
    Zietman, A.
    Efstathiou, J.
    Lu, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3683 - 3683
  • [49] Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer
    Tommasino, Francesco
    Fellin, Francesco
    Lorentini, Stefano
    Farace, Paolo
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 50 : 7 - 12
  • [50] Initial Report of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Posthysterectomy Patients With Gynecologic Cancer
    Lin, Lilie L.
    Kirk, Maura
    Scholey, Jessica
    Taku, Nicolette
    Kiely, Janid B.
    White, Benjamin
    Both, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 181 - 189