Monte Carlo study of photon fields from a flattening filter-free clinical accelerator

被引:90
|
作者
Vassiliev, ON [1 ]
Titt, U [1 ]
Kry, SF [1 ]
Pönisch, F [1 ]
Gillin, MT [1 ]
Mohan, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2174720
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In conventional clinical linear accelerators, the flattening filter scatters and absorbs a large fraction of primary photons. Increasing the beam-on time, which also increases the out-of-field exposure to patients, compensates for the reduction in photon fluence. In recent years, intensity modulated radiation therapy has been introduced, yielding better dose distributions than conventional three-dimensional conformal therapy. The drawback of this method is the further increase in beam-on time. An accelerator with the flattening filter removed, which would increase photon fluence greatly, could deliver considerably higher dose rates. The objective of the present study is to investigate the dosimetric properties of 6 and 18 MV photon beams from an accelerator without a flattening filter. The dosimetric data were generated using the Monte Carlo programs BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc. The accelerator model was based on the Varian Clinac 2100 design. We compared depth doses, dose rates, lateral profiles, doses outside collimation, total and collimator scatter factors for an accelerator with and without a flatteneing filter. The study showed that removing the filter increased the dose rate on the central axis by a factor of 2.31 (6 MV) and 5.45 (18 MV) at a given target current. Because the flattening filter is a major source of head scatter photons, its removal from the beam line could reduce the out-of-field dose. (c) 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 827
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMMISSIONING OF PHOTON BEAMS OF A FLATTENING FILTER-FREE LINEAR ACCELERATOR AND THE ACCURACY OF BEAM MODELING USING AN ANISOTROPIC ANALYTICAL ALGORITHM
    Hrbacek, Jan
    Lang, Stephanie
    Kloeck, Stephan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (04): : 1228 - 1237
  • [32] A comparative study between flattening filter-free beams and flattening filter beams in radiotherapy treatment
    Ali Wagdy
    Khaled EI Shahat
    Huda Ashry
    Amaal El Shershaby
    Ehab Abdo
    OncologyandTranslationalMedicine, 2017, 3 (06) : 260 - 266
  • [33] Surface Dose Evaluation of the Equivalent Quality Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beams
    Meshram, M.
    Pramanik, S.
    Ranjith, C. P.
    Meshram, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3502 - 3502
  • [34] RESULTS OF A MONTE CARLO STUDY OF A FLATTENING FILTER FREE (FFF) LINAC.
    Titt, U.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S111 - S111
  • [35] Dosimetric Evaluation of Flattening Filter-free (FFF) Photon Beams for Lung SBRT
    Chen, Q.
    Cai, J.
    Wu, Q.
    Yin, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S609 - S609
  • [36] Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation
    Wang, Yuenan
    Easterling, Stephen B.
    Ting, Joseph Y.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 13 (05): : 262 - 268
  • [37] Skin Dose From Flattening Filter Free Beams: A Monte Carlo Investigation
    Zhang, G.
    Javedan, K.
    Moros, E.
    Latifi, K.
    Feygelman, V.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3815 - 3815
  • [38] Ion Recombination Corrections Factor in Flattening Filter-Free and Conventional Photon Radiation
    Yang, B.
    Wang, Z.
    Qiu, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2939 - 2939
  • [39] Monte Carlo simulation of backscatter in a flattening filter free Clinac
    Titt, U.
    Poenisch, F.
    Kry, S.
    Zhu, X.
    Mohan, R.
    Vassiliev, O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2123 - 2123
  • [40] Evaluation of beam modeling for small fields using a flattening filter-free beam
    Kawahara D.
    Ozawa S.
    Nakashima T.
    Aita M.
    Tsuda S.
    Ochi Y.
    Okumura T.
    Masuda H.
    Ohno Y.
    Murakami Y.
    Nagata Y.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2017, 10 (1) : 33 - 40