Comparison of different body measurement techniques: 3D stationary scanner, 3D handheld scanner, and tape measurement

被引:22
|
作者
Xia, Sibei [1 ]
Guo, Siming [1 ]
Li, Jiayin [1 ]
Istook, Cynthia [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Text & Apparel, Technol & Management, 1020 Main Campus Dr, Raleigh, NC 27606 USA
关键词
Handheld scanner; whole-body stationary scanner; tape measure; structure sensor; FIT;
D O I
10.1080/00405000.2018.1541437
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
Body measurements play an import role in pattern generation and size determination. Traditionally, body measurements were captured with tape measures. The tape measure technique is often time-consuming. Nowadays, three-dimensional (3D) stationary whole-body scanners are widely used in the apparel industry to collect body measurements. The stationary scanner has good performance on efficiency, validity, and reliability. However, it is not suitable for home use due to its high cost. Occipital's Structure Sensor, as a representation for low-price handheld 3D scanners, is a 3D scanner for mobile devices. This research focused on studying whether the Structure Sensor could be used to capture body measurements for the apparel industry or not. Its performance was compared to a whole-body stationary scanner and the tape measurement. It was found that the Structure Sensor could be used to collect body measurements data with relatively low reliability if corresponding measurement extraction software was developed.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1113
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Handheld 3D Surface Measurement System
    Lindberg, Abby M.
    Reis, F. Garrett
    Johnson, Micah K.
    2021 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR AEROSPACE (IEEE METROAEROSPACE), 2021, : 149 - 153
  • [32] PERFORMANCE INVESTIGATION OF A HANDHELD 3D SCANNER TO DEFINE GOOD PRACTICES FOR SMALL ARTEFACT 3D MODELING
    Lachat, E.
    Landes, T.
    Grussenmeyer, P.
    ICOMOS/ISPRS INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION (CIPA) 26TH INTERNATIONAL CIPA SYMPOSIUM - DIGITAL WORKFLOWS FOR HERITAGE CONSERVATION, 2017, 42-2 (W5): : 427 - 434
  • [33] 3D FIT GARMENT SIMULATION BASED ON 3D BODY SCANNER ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA
    Olaru, Sabina
    Filipescu, Emilia
    Filipescu, Elena
    Niculescu, Claudia
    Salistean, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DAAAM BALTIC INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 326 - 331
  • [34] Utilizing a Terrestrial Laser Scanner for 3D Luminance Measurement of Indoor Environments
    Kurkela, Matti
    Maksimainen, Mikko
    Julin, Arttu
    Rantanen, Toni
    Virtanen, Juho-Pekka
    Hyyppa, Juha
    Vaaja, Matti Tapio
    Hyyppa, Hannu
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2021, 7 (05)
  • [35] Study on Improving Accuracy for Edge Measurement Using 3D Laser Scanner
    Hiekata, Kazuo
    Yamato, Hiroyuki
    Sun, Jingyu
    Matsubara, Hiroya
    Toki, Naoji
    PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR A GLOBAL MARKET (PLM 2014), 2014, 442 : 427 - 434
  • [36] Measurement of Bow in Silicon Solar Cell Using 3D Image Scanner
    Yoon, Phil Young
    Baek, Tae Heon
    Song, Hee Eun
    Chung, Haseung
    Shin, Seungwon
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS B, 2013, 37 (09) : 823 - 828
  • [37] Combination measurement method using laser tracker and 3D laser scanner
    Yang, L.
    Li, G. X.
    Wu, B. Z.
    Zhang, M.
    ENERGY SCIENCE AND APPLIED TECHNOLOGY (ESAT 2016), 2016, : 685 - 688
  • [38] CMOS 3D Hall probe for magnetic field measurement in MRI scanner
    Schell, J. -B.
    Kammerer, J. -B.
    Hebrard, L.
    Breton, E.
    Gounot, D.
    Cuvillon, L.
    de Mathelin, M.
    2012 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL NEW CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (NEWCAS), 2012, : 517 - 520
  • [39] An evaluation of measurement uncertainty of trajectory angles using a 3D laser scanner
    Greenwood, Stephen M.
    Paduch, Courtney D.
    Allen, Trevor T.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (03) : 828 - 838
  • [40] A 3D airborne ultrasound scanner
    Capineri, L
    Masotti, L
    Rocchi, S
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 9 (06) : 967 - 975