Comparison of different body measurement techniques: 3D stationary scanner, 3D handheld scanner, and tape measurement

被引:22
|
作者
Xia, Sibei [1 ]
Guo, Siming [1 ]
Li, Jiayin [1 ]
Istook, Cynthia [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Text & Apparel, Technol & Management, 1020 Main Campus Dr, Raleigh, NC 27606 USA
关键词
Handheld scanner; whole-body stationary scanner; tape measure; structure sensor; FIT;
D O I
10.1080/00405000.2018.1541437
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
Body measurements play an import role in pattern generation and size determination. Traditionally, body measurements were captured with tape measures. The tape measure technique is often time-consuming. Nowadays, three-dimensional (3D) stationary whole-body scanners are widely used in the apparel industry to collect body measurements. The stationary scanner has good performance on efficiency, validity, and reliability. However, it is not suitable for home use due to its high cost. Occipital's Structure Sensor, as a representation for low-price handheld 3D scanners, is a 3D scanner for mobile devices. This research focused on studying whether the Structure Sensor could be used to capture body measurements for the apparel industry or not. Its performance was compared to a whole-body stationary scanner and the tape measurement. It was found that the Structure Sensor could be used to collect body measurements data with relatively low reliability if corresponding measurement extraction software was developed.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1113
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intraoral 3D scanner
    Kuehmstedt, Peter
    Braeuer-Burchardt, Christian
    Munkelt, Christoph
    Heinze, Matthias
    Palme, Martin
    Schmidt, Ingo
    Hintersehr, Joseph
    Notni, Gunther
    TWO- AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL METHODS FOR INSPECTION AND METROLOGY V, 2007, 6762
  • [22] Error analysis of the ATOS 3D optical scanner in vehicle measurement
    Xie Xuedong
    Zhao Weiling
    MACHINE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 365-366 : 654 - 657
  • [23] 3D Shape and Specular Reflection Measurement Using Image Scanner
    Ukida, Hiroyuki
    2008 PROCEEDINGS OF SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2008, : 1467 - 1471
  • [24] Portable 3D Laser Scanner for Volume Measurement of Coal Pile
    Zhang, Wang
    Yang, Deshan
    Li, Ying
    Xu, Wenhai
    COMMUNICATIONS, SIGNAL PROCESSING, AND SYSTEMS, CSPS 2018, VOL III: SYSTEMS, 2020, 517 : 340 - 347
  • [25] Improvement of 3D Scanner
    LI Ming-ming
    SemiconductorPhotonicsandTechnology, 2003, (02) : 133 - 136
  • [26] Comparison of a 2D iPad application and 3D body scanner to air displacement plethysmography for measurement of body fat percentage
    Wagner, D. R.
    Castaneda, F.
    Bohman, B.
    Sterr, W.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2019, 32 (06) : 781 - 788
  • [27] Accurate measurement of cartilage morphology using a 3D laser scanner
    Trinh, Nhon H.
    Lester, Jonathan
    Fleming, Braden C.
    Tung, Glenn
    Kimia, Benjamin B.
    COMPUTER VISION APPROACHES TO MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2006, 4241 : 37 - 48
  • [28] Measurement error using a SeeMaLab structured light 3D scanner against a Microscribe 3D digitizer
    Messer, Dolores
    Svendsen, Michelle S.
    Galatius, Anders
    Olsen, Morten T.
    Dahl, Vedrana A.
    Conradsen, Knut
    Dahl, Anders B.
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [29] HANDHELD VOLUMETRIC SCANNER FOR 3D PRINTED INTEGRATIONS OF HISTORICAL ELEMENTS: COMPARISON AND RESULTS
    De Luca, D.
    Del Giudice, M.
    Grasso, N.
    Matrone, F.
    Osello, A.
    Piras, M.
    27TH CIPA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: DOCUMENTING THE PAST FOR A BETTER FUTURE, 2019, 42-2 (W15): : 381 - 388
  • [30] Comparison of optical 3D scanner and coordinate measurement system from the standpoint of macro-geometry measurement
    Patoprsty, Boris
    Vozar, Marek
    Hrusecky, Robert
    Buransky, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (01) : 99 - 107