Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Di Mascio, D. [1 ]
Khalil, A. [2 ,3 ]
Rizzo, G. [4 ,5 ]
Buca, D. [6 ]
Liberati, M. [6 ]
Martellucci, C. A. [7 ]
Flacco, M. E. [8 ]
Manzoli, L. [8 ]
D'Antonio, F. [6 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth & Urol Sci, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ London, St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, London, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, Vasc Biol Res Ctr, Mol & Clin Sci Res Inst, London, England
[4] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Div Maternal & Fetal Med, Osped Cristo Re, Rome, Italy
[5] First IM Sechenov Moscow State Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Moscow, Russia
[6] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ctr Fetal Care & High Risk Pregnancy, Via Vestini, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[7] Univ Marche Reg, Dept Biomed Sci & Publ Hlth, Ancona, Italy
[8] Univ Ferrara, Dept Med Sci, Ferrara, Italy
关键词
amniocentesis; chorionic villus sampling; CVS; fetal loss; invasive; miscarriage; twins; twin pregnancy; 2ND TRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS; GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS; MATERNAL BLOOD; DISCORDANCE; ULTRASOUND; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/uog.22143
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the rate of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in twin pregnancy. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting procedure-related complications following amniocentesis or CVS in twin pregnancy. The primary outcome was the rate of procedure-related fetal loss. The secondary outcomes were fetal loss occurring before 24 weeks of gestation and fetal loss occurring within 4 weeks after the procedure. Head-to-head meta-analyses were used to compare directly each outcome, between women undergoing amniocentesis and those not undergoing amniocentesis and between women undergoing CVS and those not undergoing CVS, and to compute pooled risk differences (RD) between women exposed and those not exposed to each invasive procedure. Additionally, meta-analyses of proportions were used to estimate the pooled rates of each of the three outcomes in women undergoing amniocentesis or CVS and in controls. Results Sixteen studies (3419 twin pregnancies undergoing and 2517 not undergoing an invasive procedure) were included. Head-to-head meta-analyses comparing directly twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing amniocentesis showed a higher risk for overall fetal loss in those undergoing amniocentesis (odds ratio (OR), 1.46 (P = 0.04); RD, 0.013 (P = 0.04)), while there was no difference in the risk of either fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.59 (P = 0.06); RD, 0.010 (P = 0.11)) or fetal loss within 4 weeks after the procedure (OR, 1.38 (P = 0.3); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.4-3.6%) in twin pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis compared with 2.4% (95% CI, 0.9-4.6%) in those not undergoing amniocentesis. Head-to-head meta-analyses directly comparing twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing CVS showed no significant difference in either overall fetal loss (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)) or fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.0-6.5%) in twin pregnancies undergoing CVS compared with 1.8% (95% CI, 0.3-4.2%) in those not undergoing CVS. Conclusion The risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis and CVS in twins is lower than reported previously and the rate of fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation, or within 4 weeks after the procedure, did not differ from the background risk in twin pregnancy not undergoing invasive prenatal testing. These data can guide prenatal counseling for twin pregnancies undergoing invasive procedures. (c) 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 655
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Total Pregnancy Loss After Chorionic Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis: A Cohort Study EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Bakker, M.
    Birnie, E.
    de Medina, P. Robles
    Sollie, K. M.
    Pajkrt, E.
    Bilardo, C. M.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2017, 72 (10) : 575 - +
  • [32] Adverse effects of chorionic villus sampling: a meta-analysis
    Brumback, BA
    Holmes, LB
    Ryan, LM
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1999, 18 (16) : 2163 - 2175
  • [33] Foetal loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: A multicentre retrospective cohort study
    Navaratnam, Kate
    Khairudin, Delima
    Chilton, Robyn
    Sharp, Andrew
    Attilakos, George
    Stott, Daniel
    Relph, Sophie
    Spencer, Rebecca
    Badr, Dominique A.
    Carlin, Andrew
    Jani, Jacques
    Kilby, Mark D.
    Sebghati, Mercede
    Khalil, Asma
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2022, 42 (12) : 1554 - 1561
  • [34] Effect of chorionic villus sampling on the occurrence of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Basaran, Ahmet
    Basaran, Mustafa
    Topatan, Betul
    Martin, James N., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 17 (02) : 65 - 72
  • [35] Rates of pregnancy loss in dichorionic diamniotic twin gestations undergoing chorionic villus sampling
    Vieira, Luciana
    Warren, Leslie
    Rekawek, Patricia
    Rodriguez, Alexandra
    Pan, Stephanie
    Overbey, Jessica
    Stone, Joanne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S165 - S165
  • [36] Comparative analysis of obstetric, perinatal, and neurodevelopmental outcomes following chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis
    Kim, Nari
    Joo, Eun Hui
    Kim, Seoyeon
    Kim, Taeho
    Ahn, Eun Hee
    Jung, Sang Hee
    Ryu, Hyun Mee
    Lee, Ji Yeon
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [37] Evaluating the Rate and Risk Factors for Fetal Loss After Chorionic Villus Sampling
    Cohen, Sarah M.
    Yagel, Simcha
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (02): : 437 - 437
  • [38] Evaluating the rate and risk factors for fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Dicke, Jeffrey M.
    Gray, Diana L.
    Oberle, Barbara
    Stamilio, David M.
    Macones, George A.
    Crane, James P.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (04): : 813 - 819
  • [39] Chorionic Villus Sampling, Early Amniocentesis, and Termination of Pregnancy Without Diagnostic Testing: Comparison of Fetal Risk Following Positive Non-invasive Prenatal Testing
    Zelig, Craig M.
    Knutzen, Dana M.
    Ennen, Christopher S.
    Dolinsky, Brad M.
    Napolitano, Peter G.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2016, 38 (05) : 441 - +
  • [40] Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study
    Tabor, A.
    Vestergaard, C. H. F.
    Lidegaard, O.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 34 (01) : 19 - 24