Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Di Mascio, D. [1 ]
Khalil, A. [2 ,3 ]
Rizzo, G. [4 ,5 ]
Buca, D. [6 ]
Liberati, M. [6 ]
Martellucci, C. A. [7 ]
Flacco, M. E. [8 ]
Manzoli, L. [8 ]
D'Antonio, F. [6 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth & Urol Sci, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ London, St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, London, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, Vasc Biol Res Ctr, Mol & Clin Sci Res Inst, London, England
[4] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Div Maternal & Fetal Med, Osped Cristo Re, Rome, Italy
[5] First IM Sechenov Moscow State Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Moscow, Russia
[6] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ctr Fetal Care & High Risk Pregnancy, Via Vestini, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[7] Univ Marche Reg, Dept Biomed Sci & Publ Hlth, Ancona, Italy
[8] Univ Ferrara, Dept Med Sci, Ferrara, Italy
关键词
amniocentesis; chorionic villus sampling; CVS; fetal loss; invasive; miscarriage; twins; twin pregnancy; 2ND TRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS; GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS; MATERNAL BLOOD; DISCORDANCE; ULTRASOUND; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/uog.22143
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the rate of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in twin pregnancy. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting procedure-related complications following amniocentesis or CVS in twin pregnancy. The primary outcome was the rate of procedure-related fetal loss. The secondary outcomes were fetal loss occurring before 24 weeks of gestation and fetal loss occurring within 4 weeks after the procedure. Head-to-head meta-analyses were used to compare directly each outcome, between women undergoing amniocentesis and those not undergoing amniocentesis and between women undergoing CVS and those not undergoing CVS, and to compute pooled risk differences (RD) between women exposed and those not exposed to each invasive procedure. Additionally, meta-analyses of proportions were used to estimate the pooled rates of each of the three outcomes in women undergoing amniocentesis or CVS and in controls. Results Sixteen studies (3419 twin pregnancies undergoing and 2517 not undergoing an invasive procedure) were included. Head-to-head meta-analyses comparing directly twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing amniocentesis showed a higher risk for overall fetal loss in those undergoing amniocentesis (odds ratio (OR), 1.46 (P = 0.04); RD, 0.013 (P = 0.04)), while there was no difference in the risk of either fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.59 (P = 0.06); RD, 0.010 (P = 0.11)) or fetal loss within 4 weeks after the procedure (OR, 1.38 (P = 0.3); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.4-3.6%) in twin pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis compared with 2.4% (95% CI, 0.9-4.6%) in those not undergoing amniocentesis. Head-to-head meta-analyses directly comparing twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing CVS showed no significant difference in either overall fetal loss (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)) or fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.0-6.5%) in twin pregnancies undergoing CVS compared with 1.8% (95% CI, 0.3-4.2%) in those not undergoing CVS. Conclusion The risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis and CVS in twins is lower than reported previously and the rate of fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation, or within 4 weeks after the procedure, did not differ from the background risk in twin pregnancy not undergoing invasive prenatal testing. These data can guide prenatal counseling for twin pregnancies undergoing invasive procedures. (c) 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 655
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREGNANCY LOSS AFTER AMNIOCENTESIS AND CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING: COHORT STUDY
    Paljk Likar, Ivana
    Slavec Jere, Ksenija
    Mozina, Teja
    Verdenik, Ivan
    Tul, Natasa
    ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2021, 60 (01): : 25 - 29
  • [22] Risk of Fetal Loss in Pregnancies Undergoing Midtrimester Amniocentesis after Inconclusive Chorionic Villus Sampling
    Salsi, Ginevra
    Grati, Francesca Romana
    Bellussi, Federica
    Pompilii, Eva
    Maggi, Federico
    Simoni, Giuseppe
    D'Ambrosi, Francesco
    Orsi, Michele
    Gentile, Mattia
    Rembouskos, Georgios
    Zuliani, Guglielmo
    Volpe, Paolo
    Pilu, Gianluigi
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2019, 46 (03) : 149 - 152
  • [23] Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling
    Sundberg, K
    Bang, J
    SmidtJensen, S
    Brocks, V
    Lundsteen, C
    Parner, J
    Keiding, N
    Philip, J
    LANCET, 1997, 350 (9079): : 697 - 703
  • [24] Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss - In reply
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Hopkins, Linda M.
    Norton, Mary E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (01): : 205 - 206
  • [25] Total pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a cohort study
    Bakker, M.
    Birnie, E.
    De Medina, P. Robles
    Sollie, K. M.
    Pajkrt, E.
    Bilardo, C. M.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (05) : 599 - 606
  • [26] Does chorionic villus sampling protect against fetal loss in twin pregnancy at high background risk of spontaneous miscarriage?
    Li, Y. -L.
    Li, D. -Z.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (02) : 273 - 274
  • [27] DECREASING RISK OF PREGNANCY LOSS FOLLOWING CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING - ELIMINATION OF TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING DURING THE 9TH WEEK OF PREGNANCY
    GINSBERG, NA
    APPLEBAUM, M
    BOZORGI, N
    CADKIN, AV
    VERLINSKY, Y
    STROM, CM
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1992, 37 (10) : 853 - 856
  • [28] Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis
    Beta, J.
    Zhang, W.
    Geris, S.
    Kostiv, V.
    Akolekar, R.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (04) : 452 - 457
  • [29] Does chorionic villus sampling protect against fetal loss in twin pregnancy at high background risk of spontaneous miscarriage? Reply
    Gil, M. M.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (02) : 274 - 274
  • [30] Predictors of fetal loss (FL) following chorionic villus sampling (CVS)
    Odibo, Anthony
    Stamilio, David
    Oberle, Barbara
    Dicke, Jeffrey
    Gray, Diana
    Macones, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S167 - S167