The posthumous privacy paradox: Privacy preferences and behavior regarding digital remains

被引:15
|
作者
Morse, Tal [1 ]
Birnhack, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Acad Coll, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Law, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Digital legacy; digital remains; posthumous privacy; privacy paradox; FACEBOOK; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1177/1461444820974955
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Scholars have observed a gap between users' stated preferences to protect their privacy and their actual behavior. This is the privacy paradox. This article queries the persistence of the privacy paradox after death. A survey of a representative sample of Israeli Internet users inquired of perceptions, preferences, and actions taken by users regarding their digital remains. The analysis yielded three distinct groups: (1) users interested in preserving privacy posthumously but do not act accordingly; for these users, the privacy paradox persists posthumously; (2) users who match their behavior to their preferences; for these users, the privacy paradox is resolved; and (3) users interested in sharing their personal data posthumously but do not make the appropriate provisions. This scenario is the inverted privacy paradox. This new category has yet to be addressed in the literature. We present some explanations for the persistence of the posthumous privacy paradox and for the inverted privacy paradox.
引用
收藏
页码:1343 / 1362
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Past the Privacy Paradox: The Importance of Privacy Changes as a Function of Control and Complexity
    Mourey, James A.
    Waldman, Ari Ezra
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2020, 5 (02) : 162 - 180
  • [42] Virtual influencers and data privacy: Introducing the multi-privacy paradox
    Liyanaarachchi, Gajendra
    Mifsud, Matthieu
    Viglia, Giampaolo
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 176
  • [43] Privacy Preferences of Consumer and Lender: A Case of Digital Credit Systems in India
    Koul, Saroj
    Verma, Rakesh
    Ajaygopal, K., V
    JOURNAL OF INTERNET COMMERCE, 2024, 23 (04) : 414 - 444
  • [44] Reasoning with Imprecise Privacy Preferences
    Omoronyia, Inah
    FSE'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 24TH ACM SIGSOFT INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2016, : 952 - 955
  • [45] Intransitivity of Consumer Preferences for Privacy
    Tomaino, Geoff
    Wertenbroch, Klaus
    Walters, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2023, 60 (03) : 489 - 507
  • [46] Privacy Preferences and the Drive to Disclose
    Carbone, Erin
    Loewenstein, George
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 32 (06) : 508 - 514
  • [47] RELATIONSHIP OF PERSONALITY TO PRIVACY PREFERENCES
    PEDERSEN, DM
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1987, 2 (02): : 267 - 274
  • [48] REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN PRIVACY PREFERENCES
    PEDERSEN, DM
    FRANCES, S
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1990, 66 (03) : 731 - 736
  • [49] Privacy paradox in mHealth applications: An integrated elaboration likelihood model incorporating privacy calculus and privacy fatigue
    Zhu, Mengxi
    Wu, Chuanhui
    Huang, Shijing
    Zheng, Kai
    Young, Sean D.
    Yan, Xianglin
    Yuan, Qinjian
    TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2021, 61
  • [50] Protecting Human Health and Security in Digital Europe: How to Deal with the "Privacy Paradox"?
    Bueschel, Isabell
    Mehdi, Rostane
    Cammilleri, Anne
    Marzouki, Yousri
    Elger, Bernice
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2014, 20 (03) : 639 - 658