Agreement and repeatability of pupillometry using videokeratography and infrared devices

被引:45
|
作者
Wachler, BSB
Krueger, RR
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jules Stein Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Cleveland Eye Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Cleveland, OH USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00331-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of the pupil-measuring modules of several corneal topography devices. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University Eye Institute, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Methods: In 14 eyes of 7 healthy myopic patients, pupillometry was performed with 3 corneal topography devices and with an infrared pupillometer under luminance-matched conditions for the Placido projection of the topography devices. Pupils were also measured under a mesopic condition. Outcomes were pupil diameters, limits of agreement, and coefficient of repeatability of the topography devices. Results: Mean pupil diameter measurements with the Technomed C-Scan, Humphrey Masterview, Alcon EyeMap, and under a mesopic condition were 3.35 mm, 2.96 mm, 2.34 mm, and 5.94 mm, respectively. All pupil diameter measurements differed significantly from one another except those by the Masterview and C-Scan devices. The mean difference between the C-Scan and luminance-matched infrared measurements was 0.74 mm and between the Masterview and luminance-matched infrared measurements, 0.27 mm. The limits of agreement +/-2 standard deviations was 4.12 mm and 1.56 mm for the C-Scan and Masterview devices, respectively. Coefficients of repeatability were 0.56 mm, 0.46 mm, and 0.44 mm for the C-Scan, Masterview, and EyeMap devices, respectively. Conclusions: Although topography pupillometry was repeatable, it underestimated the largest natural pupil diameter because of the luminance of the Placido rings. The difference in limits of agreement between the C-Scan and Masterview devices may be explained by pupil physiology and the static nature of videokeratoscopy. These results have implications when topography pupillometry is used to assess pupil diameters prior to refractive surgery. We do not recommend using pupil diameters measured by topography to preoperatively determine halo-related safety. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:35-40 (C) 2000 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative Infrared Pupillometry in Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus
    Godau, Jana
    Bierwirth, Claudia
    Roesche, Johannes
    Boesel, Julian
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2021, 35 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [42] Repeatability and agreement of an automated and objective cover test
    Mestre, Clara
    Otero Molins, Carles
    Diaz-Douton, Fernando
    Gautier, Josselin
    Pujol, Jaume
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [43] Quantitative Infrared Pupillometry in Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus
    Jana Godau
    Claudia Bierwirth
    Johannes Rösche
    Julian Bösel
    Neurocritical Care, 2021, 35 : 113 - 120
  • [44] MEASURING PUPILLARY REFLEX DILATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PEDIATRIC PATIENTS USING INFRARED PUPILLOMETRY
    Suh, Philip
    Liu, Paul
    Shrey, Daniel
    Kelly, Robert
    Schwarz, Adam
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [45] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETECTING KERATOCONUS USING VIDEOKERATOGRAPHY
    MAEDA, N
    KLYCE, SD
    SMOLEK, MK
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 113 (07) : 870 - 874
  • [46] Repeatability and accuracy of tests performed using two superpave shear devices
    Pellinen, T
    Christensen, D
    MECHANICAL TESTS FOR BITUMINOUS MATERIALS: RECENT IMPROVEMENTS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS, 1997, : 357 - 364
  • [47] Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices
    Saad, Amr
    Steinberg, Johannes
    Frings, Andreas
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [48] Repeatability of Grading Meibomian Gland Dropout Using Two Infrared Systems
    Ngo, William
    Srinivasan, Sruthi
    Schulze, Marc
    Jones, Lyndon
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2014, 91 (06) : 658 - 667
  • [49] The Repeatability and Agreement of Ocular Parameters Measured with the MYAH and Myopia Master Devices between Expert and Non-Expert Practitioners
    Ortiz-Toquero, Sara
    Sanchez, Irene
    Gurrea, Carmen
    Recio, Alba
    Balsa, David
    Martin, Raul
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [50] Agreement and repeatability of objective systems for assessment of the tear film
    Fernandez, Joaquin
    Rodriguez-Vallejo, Manuel
    Martinez, Javier
    Tauste, Ana
    Garcia-Montesinos, Javier
    Pinero, David P.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 256 (08) : 1535 - 1541