Agreement and repeatability of pupillometry using videokeratography and infrared devices

被引:45
|
作者
Wachler, BSB
Krueger, RR
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jules Stein Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Cleveland Eye Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Cleveland, OH USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00331-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of the pupil-measuring modules of several corneal topography devices. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University Eye Institute, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Methods: In 14 eyes of 7 healthy myopic patients, pupillometry was performed with 3 corneal topography devices and with an infrared pupillometer under luminance-matched conditions for the Placido projection of the topography devices. Pupils were also measured under a mesopic condition. Outcomes were pupil diameters, limits of agreement, and coefficient of repeatability of the topography devices. Results: Mean pupil diameter measurements with the Technomed C-Scan, Humphrey Masterview, Alcon EyeMap, and under a mesopic condition were 3.35 mm, 2.96 mm, 2.34 mm, and 5.94 mm, respectively. All pupil diameter measurements differed significantly from one another except those by the Masterview and C-Scan devices. The mean difference between the C-Scan and luminance-matched infrared measurements was 0.74 mm and between the Masterview and luminance-matched infrared measurements, 0.27 mm. The limits of agreement +/-2 standard deviations was 4.12 mm and 1.56 mm for the C-Scan and Masterview devices, respectively. Coefficients of repeatability were 0.56 mm, 0.46 mm, and 0.44 mm for the C-Scan, Masterview, and EyeMap devices, respectively. Conclusions: Although topography pupillometry was repeatable, it underestimated the largest natural pupil diameter because of the luminance of the Placido rings. The difference in limits of agreement between the C-Scan and Masterview devices may be explained by pupil physiology and the static nature of videokeratoscopy. These results have implications when topography pupillometry is used to assess pupil diameters prior to refractive surgery. We do not recommend using pupil diameters measured by topography to preoperatively determine halo-related safety. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:35-40 (C) 2000 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agreement and repeatability of infrared pupillometry and the comparison method
    Wachler, BSB
    Krueger, RR
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (02) : 319 - 323
  • [2] Pupillometry using videokeratography in eyes with dark brown irides
    Fogla, R
    Rao, SK
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (09): : 1266 - 1267
  • [3] Agreement and Repeatability of an Infrared Thermometer
    Kelechi, Teresa J.
    Good, Angela
    Mueller, Martina
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2011, 19 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [4] Comparison of repeat videokeratography: Repeatability and accuracy
    Jeandervin, M
    Barr, J
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1998, 75 (09) : 663 - 669
  • [5] Repeatability and agreement of higher order aberrations for different devices
    Stengele, Annette Laetitia
    Koeppe, Maximilian
    Naujokaitis, Tadas
    Auffarth, Gerd U.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [6] Repeatability and agreement of total corneal astigmatism measured in keratoconic eyes using four current devices
    Feng, Yue
    Nitter, Tore
    Bertelsen, Geir
    Stojanovic, Aleksandar
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 52 (08): : 800 - 810
  • [7] Repeatability and Agreement of Various High-Speed Macrotexture Measurement Devices
    Bongioanni, Vincent, I
    Maeger, Kyle
    Katicha, Samer W.
    Izeppi, Edgar D. de Leon
    Flintsch, Gerardo W.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2019, 2673 (02) : 650 - 662
  • [8] Infrared Pupillometry Using an Optical Coherence Tomography Scanner
    McHugh, James A.
    Bremner, Fion D.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 124 (11) : 1669 - 1669
  • [9] Comparing Repeatability and Agreement between Commonly Used Corneal Imaging Devices in Keratoconus
    Angelo, Lize
    Gokul, Akilesh
    Mcghee, Charles
    Ziaei, Mohammed
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2023, 100 (11) : 761 - 769
  • [10] Overview of the Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement of the Biometry Values Provided by Various Ophthalmic Devices
    Rozema, Jos J.
    Wouters, Kristien
    Mathysen, Danny G. P.
    Tassignon, Marie-Jose
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 158 (06) : 1111 - 1120