Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review

被引:49
|
作者
Cordova, Leonardo Z. [1 ]
Hunter-Smith, David J. [1 ]
Rozen, Warren M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Peninsula Hlth, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Frankston, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; patient reported outcome measures (PROM); breast reconstruction; mastectomy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BODY-IMAGE; EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION; CONSERVING SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE MODULE; CANCER SURGERY; SELF-ESTEEM; WOMEN; SATISFACTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21037/gs.2019.07.02
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The cornerstone of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy is to restore cosmesis and improve physical and psychological health. Consequently, it has become essential for instruments that measure surgical outcomes to include the direct perspective of patients. Many reviews have failed to show significant improvements in quality of life domains following breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone. However, with advances in surgical techniques and patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessment tools designed precisely for breast reconstruction patients, a modern systematic review is warranted. An electronic literature review was performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Medline (using PubMed) comparing patient reported outcome measures of patients undergoing mastectomy alone versus patients undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Studies in the English and Portuguese languages since the year 2000 were included. The review was undertaken adhering to PRISMA guidelines with last entry on the 31/5/2018. Full text review yield 42 articles of relevance to the inclusion criteria. The most widely used PROM instruments such as Breast-Q, EORTC-Q30/Q23, Short Form 36, FACT-B and others are explored. The specific difficulties conducting such studies and biases identified arc investigated further. Studies comparing mastectomy alone against mastectomy with reconstruction show difficulties forming groups with similar clinical and epidemiological characteristics. There are inherent limitations to performing a randomised controlled trial on this topic, including matching patient groups in terms of age, socioeconomical background and cancer staging, and this affects the results of the PROM instruments. Within these limitations, the literature suggests that PROM support the use of breast reconstruction following mastectomy but care must be made selecting patients. The finding is supported by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines which state that breast reconstruction should be offered to all women undergoing breast cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 451
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decisional regret and choice of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: A systematic review
    Flitcroft, Kathy
    Brennan, Meagan
    Spillane, Andrew
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 (04) : 1110 - 1120
  • [32] A review of breast imaging following mastectomy with or without reconstruction in an outpatient community center
    Stamatia Destounis
    Renee Morgan
    Andrea Arieno
    Posy Seifert
    Patricia Somerville
    Philip Murphy
    Breast Cancer, 2011, 18 : 259 - 267
  • [33] ASO Visual Abstract: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Clinical T4 Breast Cancer Treated with Mastectomy With and Without Reconstruction
    Emily Palmquist
    Jessica Limberg
    Jacqueline J. Chu
    Charlie White
    Raymond E. Baser
    Varadan Sevilimedu
    Kate R. Pawloski
    Paula Garcia
    Jonas A. Nelson
    Tracy-Ann Moo
    Monica Morrow
    Audree B. Tadros
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 124 - 125
  • [34] Women’s expectations of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review
    Kathy Flitcroft
    Meagan Brennan
    Andrew Spillane
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017, 25 : 2631 - 2661
  • [35] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients Who Have Clinical T4 Breast Cancer Treated via Mastectomy with and Without Reconstruction
    Emily Palmquist
    Jessica Limberg
    Jacqueline J. Chu
    Charlie White
    Raymond E. Baser
    Varadan Sevilimedu
    Kate R. Pawloski
    Paula Garcia
    Jonas A. Nelson
    Tracy-Ann Moo
    Monica Morrow
    Audree B. Tadros
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 115 - 121
  • [36] ASO Visual Abstract: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Clinical T4 Breast Cancer Treated with Mastectomy With and Without Reconstruction
    Palmquist, Emily
    Limberg, Jessica
    Chu, Jacqueline J.
    White, Charlie
    Baser, Raymond E.
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Pawloski, Kate R.
    Garcia, Paula
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Moo, Tracy-Ann
    Morrow, Monica
    Tadros, Audree B.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (01) : 124 - 125
  • [37] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients Who Have Clinical T4 Breast Cancer Treated via Mastectomy with and Without Reconstruction
    Palmquist, Emily
    Limberg, Jessica
    Chu, Jacqueline J.
    White, Charlie
    Baser, Raymond E.
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Pawloski, Kate R.
    Garcia, Paula
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Moo, Tracy-Ann
    Morrow, Monica
    Tadros, Audree B.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (01) : 115 - 121
  • [38] Breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: patient satisfaction with immediate and delayed reconstruction
    Walker, LG
    Frizelle, DJ
    Spyrou, G
    Garrido, A
    Ali, R
    Ramakrishnan, V
    Sharp, DM
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2003, 12 (04) : S142 - S142
  • [39] Patient reported outcome measures in a cohort of patients at high risk of breast cancer treated by bilateral risk reducing mastectomy and breast reconstruction
    Gandhi, A.
    Duxbury, P.
    Murphy, J.
    Foden, P.
    Lalloo, F.
    Clancy, T.
    Wisely, J.
    Kirwan, C. C.
    Howell, A.
    Evans, D. G.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (01): : 69 - 76
  • [40] PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES (PROMS) IN SARCOIDOSIS
    Thunold, Rikke Flor
    Lokke, Anders
    Cohen, Adam Langballe
    Ole, Hilberg
    Bendstrup, Elisabeth
    SARCOIDOSIS VASCULITIS AND DIFFUSE LUNG DISEASES, 2017, 34 (01) : 2 - 17