Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review

被引:49
|
作者
Cordova, Leonardo Z. [1 ]
Hunter-Smith, David J. [1 ]
Rozen, Warren M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Peninsula Hlth, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Frankston, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; patient reported outcome measures (PROM); breast reconstruction; mastectomy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BODY-IMAGE; EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION; CONSERVING SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE MODULE; CANCER SURGERY; SELF-ESTEEM; WOMEN; SATISFACTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21037/gs.2019.07.02
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The cornerstone of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy is to restore cosmesis and improve physical and psychological health. Consequently, it has become essential for instruments that measure surgical outcomes to include the direct perspective of patients. Many reviews have failed to show significant improvements in quality of life domains following breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone. However, with advances in surgical techniques and patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessment tools designed precisely for breast reconstruction patients, a modern systematic review is warranted. An electronic literature review was performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Medline (using PubMed) comparing patient reported outcome measures of patients undergoing mastectomy alone versus patients undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Studies in the English and Portuguese languages since the year 2000 were included. The review was undertaken adhering to PRISMA guidelines with last entry on the 31/5/2018. Full text review yield 42 articles of relevance to the inclusion criteria. The most widely used PROM instruments such as Breast-Q, EORTC-Q30/Q23, Short Form 36, FACT-B and others are explored. The specific difficulties conducting such studies and biases identified arc investigated further. Studies comparing mastectomy alone against mastectomy with reconstruction show difficulties forming groups with similar clinical and epidemiological characteristics. There are inherent limitations to performing a randomised controlled trial on this topic, including matching patient groups in terms of age, socioeconomical background and cancer staging, and this affects the results of the PROM instruments. Within these limitations, the literature suggests that PROM support the use of breast reconstruction following mastectomy but care must be made selecting patients. The finding is supported by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines which state that breast reconstruction should be offered to all women undergoing breast cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 451
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review
    Ben Bouazza, Youssef
    Chiairi, Ibrahim
    El Kharbouchi, Ouiam
    De Backer, Lesley
    Vanhoutte, Greetje
    Janssens, Annelies
    Van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2017, 113 : 140 - 151
  • [22] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hyperhidrosis: a systematic review
    Michaela Gabes
    Helge Knüttel
    Gesina Kann
    Christina Tischer
    Christian J. Apfelbacher
    Quality of Life Research, 2022, 31 : 671 - 686
  • [23] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hyperhidrosis: a systematic review
    Gabes, Michaela
    Knuettel, Helge
    Kann, Gesina
    Tischer, Christina
    Kissingen, Bad
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S104 - S104
  • [24] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
    Melly, Conor
    McGeehan, Gearoid
    O'Connor, Niall
    Johnston, Alison
    Bass, Gary
    Mohseni, Shahin
    Donohoe, Claire
    Bucholc, Magda
    Sugrue, Michael
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (03):
  • [25] A systematic review on embodiment and breast reconstruction: a patient-centered framework for evolving breast outcome measures
    Chin, Madeline G.
    Eftekari, Sahand C.
    Moura, Steven P.
    Donnelly, D'Andrea T.
    Shaffrey, Ellen C.
    Sears, Lucas
    Dingle, Aaron M.
    PLASTIC AND AESTHETIC RESEARCH, 2023, 10
  • [26] A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in child and adolescent burn research
    Griffiths, C.
    Armstrong-James, L.
    White, P.
    Rumsey, N.
    Pleat, J.
    Harcourt, D.
    BURNS, 2015, 41 (02) : 212 - 224
  • [27] Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for asthma and allergy: systematic review and evaluation of clinical utility
    Worth, A.
    Hammersley, V.
    Nurmatov, U.
    Knibb, R.
    Flokstra-de Blok, B.
    DunnGalvin, A.
    Walker, S.
    Dubois, A.
    Sheikh, A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2012, 42 (12): : 1817 - 1817
  • [28] A systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    Ishaque, Sana
    Karnon, Jonathan
    Chen, Gang
    Nair, Rahul
    Salter, Amy
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S41 - S41
  • [29] Women's expectations of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review
    Flitcroft, Kathy
    Brennan, Meagan
    Spillane, Andrew
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (08) : 2631 - 2661
  • [30] A review of breast imaging following mastectomy with or without reconstruction in an outpatient community center
    Destounis, Stamatia
    Morgan, Renee
    Arieno, Andrea
    Seifert, Posy
    Somerville, Patricia
    Murphy, Philip
    BREAST CANCER, 2011, 18 (04) : 259 - 267