Best Practices for Returning Research Findings to Participants: Methodological and Ethical Considerations for Communication Researchers

被引:9
|
作者
Hintz, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Dean, Marleah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Commun, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
SHARING DATA; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1080/19312458.2019.1650165
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Many research studies have offered ethical guidelines for the recruiting of participants, solicitation of informed consent, and harvesting of data from communities and individuals. However, few guidelines exist for returning research findings to participants although participants often desire access to the results of the studies in which they participate, and researchers are often interested in providing results. Furthermore, little research has considered the benefits and challenges of returning findings to participants outside of bioethics contexts. The decision to return findings to the individuals and/or communities from which they were taken upholds three key ethical principles, which work together to form the analytical framework for this study: respect for persons/autonomy, non-maleficence, and beneficence. Therefore, this study offers "best practices" for returning findings to participants as an ethical obligation for communication researchers. By utilizing the "expert panel process" to benchmark a panel of published expert opinions establishing ethical standards within human subject research, the purpose of this study is to aggregate and synthesize existing recommendations via grounded theory to produce novel translational insights for scholars not engaged in clinical health research. We conclude by providing seven best practices for effectively returning findings to participants based on our synthesis of the expert sources.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 54
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers' practices and perspectives
    Bunnik, Eline M.
    van Bodegom, Lisa
    Pinxten, Wim
    de Beaufort, Inez D.
    Vernooij, Meike W.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 18 : 1 - 15
  • [42] Integrating Technology for Distance Parenting Coordination: Best Practices and Ethical Considerations
    Daire, Andrew P.
    Glover, Michelle M.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2010, 7 (01): : 32 - 44
  • [43] Research on Best Practices in Information and Communication Technologies
    Cebrian de la Serna, Manuel
    PROFESORADO-REVISTA DE CURRICULUM Y FORMACION DE PROFESORADO, 2011, 15 (01): : 335 - 335
  • [44] Ethical practices of good research: survey of ethical conducts among Italian researchers on psychology
    Molina, Paola
    Pasini, Margherita
    PSICOLOGIA CLINICA DELLO SVILUPPO, 2020, 24 (03) : 541 - 550
  • [45] Semiotics and Sport Communication Research: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations
    Lee, Jung Woo
    COMMUNICATION & SPORT, 2017, 5 (03) : 374 - 395
  • [46] Practices and Attitudes toward Returning Genomic Research Results to Low-Resource Research Participants
    Raymond, Megan B.
    Cooper, Kayla E.
    Parker, Lisa S.
    Bonham, Vence L.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2021, 24 (5-6) : 241 - 252
  • [47] TEACHER RESEARCHERS: TECHNOLOGY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHILE CONDUCTING AN ACTION RESEARCH
    Isman, Aytekin
    Aksal, Fahriye Altinay
    Gazi, Zehra Altinay
    HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2009, (37): : 84 - 95
  • [48] Ethics and international business research: Considerations and best practices
    Miller, Stewart R.
    Moore, Fiona
    Eden, Lorraine
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 33 (01)
  • [49] AFTERCARE FOR PARTICIPANTS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH - ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN AN ASTHMA DRUG TRIAL
    HARTH, SC
    THONG, YH
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1995, 21 (04) : 225 - 228
  • [50] ETHICAL AND MORAL CONSIDERATIONS IN COMMUNICATION PROCESS: RESEARCH IN LATVIA
    Cekuls, Andrejs
    SGEM 2016, BK 3: ANTHROPOLOGY, ARCHAEOLOGY, HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL I, 2016, : 479 - 486