Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review

被引:39
|
作者
Hut-Mossel, Lisanne [1 ]
Ahaus, Kees [2 ]
Welker, Gera [3 ]
Gans, Rijk [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Expertise Qual & Safety, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Dept Hlth Serv Management & Org, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Internal Med, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; CLINICAL AUDIT; OPERATING-ROOM; FEEDBACK INTERVENTIONS; IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; MULTICENTER AUDIT; OF-CARE; ACCREDITATION; IMPLEMENTATION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0248677
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determine why audits might, or might not, lead to improved quality of hospital care. Methods A realist review was conducted to systematically search and synthesise the literature on audits. Data from individual papers were synthesised by coding, iteratively testing and supplementing initial programme theories, and refining these theories into a set of context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOcs). Results From our synthesis of 85 papers, seven CMOcs were identified that explain how audits work: (1) externally initiated audits create QI awareness although their impact on improvement diminishes over time; (2) a sense of urgency felt by healthcare professionals triggers engagement with an audit; (3) champions are vital for an audit to be perceived by healthcare professionals as worth the effort; (4) bottom-up initiated audits are more likely to bring about sustained change; (5) knowledge-sharing within externally mandated audits triggers participation by healthcare professionals; (6) audit data support healthcare professionals in raising issues in their dialogues with those in leadership positions; and (7) audits legitimise the provision of feedback to colleagues, which flattens the perceived hierarchy and encourages constructive collaboration. Conclusions This realist review has identified seven CMOcs that should be taken into account when seeking to optimise the design and usage of audits. These CMOcs can provide policy makers and practice leaders with an adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive audits in diverse settings and advance the audit research agenda for various contexts. PROSPERO registration CRD42016039882.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care
    Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
    Welker, Gera
    Ahaus, Kees
    Gans, Rijk
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (06):
  • [2] Exploring why quality circles work in primary health care: a realist review protocol.
    Rohrbasser A.
    Mickan S.
    Harris J.
    Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) : 110
  • [3] Exploring how and why social prescribing evaluations work: a realist review
    Elliott, Megan
    Davies, Mark
    Davies, Julie
    Wallace, Carolyn
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [4] National stroke registries for monitoring and improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic review
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    Kim, Joosup
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    Kapral, Moira K.
    Schwamm, Lee H.
    Dennis, Martin S.
    Norrving, Bo
    Meretoja, Atte
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2016, 11 (01) : 28 - 40
  • [5] Understanding How, Why and for Whom Link Work Interventions Promote Access in Community Healthcare Settings in the United Kingdom: A Realist Review
    Golby, Rebecca
    Lobban, Fiona
    Laverty, Louise
    Velemis, Kyriakos
    Aggarwal, Vishal R.
    Berry, Katherine
    Morris, Abby
    Elliott, Emma
    Harris, Rebecca
    Ross, Al
    Chew-Graham, Carolyn A.
    Budd, Miranda
    Mcgowan, Linda
    Shiers, David
    Caton, Neil
    Lodge, Chris
    French, Paul
    Griffiths, Robert
    Palmier-Claus, Jasper
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (06)
  • [6] How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
    Devi, Reena
    Chadborn, Neil H.
    Meyer, Julienne
    Banerjee, Jay
    Goodman, Claire
    Dening, Tom
    Gladman, John R. F.
    Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
    Long, Annabelle
    Usman, Adeela
    Housley, Gemma
    Lewis, Sarah
    Glover, Matthew
    Gage, Heather
    Logan, Philippa A.
    Martin, Finbarr C.
    Gordon, Adam L.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2021, 50 (04) : 1371 - 1381
  • [7] Understanding how and why upskilling programmes for unregulated care providers can support health equity in underserved communities: a realist review protocol
    Hassan, Samah
    Rac, Valeria E.
    Hodges, Brian David
    Leake, Patti
    Cobbing, Saul
    Gray, Catharine Marie
    Bartley, Nicola
    Etherington, Andrea
    Abdulwasi, Munira
    Cheung, Hei-Ching Kristy
    Anderson, Melanie
    Woods, Nicole N.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [8] Quality assessment of hospital care in Brazil: a systematic review
    Machado, Juliana Pires
    Marques Martins, Ana Cristina
    Martins, Monica Silva
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2013, 29 (06): : 1063 - 1082
  • [9] A realist review of how, why, for whom and in which contexts quality improvement in healthcare impacts inequalities
    Johnson, Lucy Lara
    Wong, Geoff
    Kuhn, Isla
    Martin, Graham P.
    Kapilashrami, Anuj
    Lennox, Laura
    Black, Georgia Bell
    Hill, Matthew
    Swiers, Ryan
    Mahmood, Hashum
    Jones, Linda
    Beng, Jude
    Ford, John
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2025,
  • [10] Understanding the causes of missingness in primary care: a realist review
    Lindsay, Calum
    Baruffati, David
    Mackenzie, Mhairi
    Ellis, David A.
    Major, Michelle
    O'Donnell, Catherine A.
    Simpson, Sharon A.
    Williamson, Andrea E.
    Wong, Geoff
    BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01):