Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:22
|
作者
Li, Yuqiu [1 ]
Yan, Lirong [1 ]
Dai, Yan [1 ]
Zhou, Yu'an [1 ]
Sun, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Ruohan [1 ]
Lin, Jinxuan [1 ]
Jin, Yuanhao [1 ]
Chen, Feng [1 ]
Guo, Xiaogang [1 ]
Chen, Keping [1 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis,Arrhythmia Ctr, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
来源
EUROPACE | 2020年 / 22卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Left bundle branch area pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy; Bundle branch block; ESC GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euaa271
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The present study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-indicated patients. Methods and results LBBAP was performed via transventricular septal approach in 25 patients as a rescue strategy in 5 patients with failed left ventricular (LV) lead placement and as a primary strategy in the remaining 20 patients. Pacing parameters, procedural characteristics, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were assessed at implantation and follow-up. Of 25 enrolled CRT-indicated patients, 14 had left bundle branch block (LBBB, 56.0%), 3 right bundle branch block (RBBB, 12.0%), 4 intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD, 16.0%), and 4 ventricular pacing dependence (16.0%). The QRS duration (QRSd) was significantly shortened by LBBAP (intrinsic 163.6 +/- 29.4 ms vs. LBBAP 123.0 +/- 10.8 ms, P < 0.001). During the mean follow-up of 9.1 months, New York Heart Association functional class was improved to 1.4 +/- 0.6 from baseline 2.6 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased to 46.9 +/- 10.2% from baseline 35.2 +/- 7.0% (P < 0.001), and LV end-diastolic dimensions (LVEDD) decreased to 56.8 +/- 9.7mm from baseline 64.1 +/- 9.9mm (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement (34.1 +/- 7.4% vs. 50.0 +/- 12.2%, P < 0.001) in LVEF in patients with LBBB. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the clinical feasibility of LBBAP in CRT-indicated patients. Left bundle branch area pacing generated narrow QRSd and led to reversal remodelling of LV with improvement in cardiac function. LBBAP may be an alternative to CRT in patients with failure of LV lead placement and a first-line option in selected patients such as those with LBBB and heart failure.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 60
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronisation therapy
    L. M. Rademakers
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2020, 28 : 52 - 55
  • [32] Left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronisation therapy
    Rademakers, L. M.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (01) : 52 - 55
  • [33] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing as Initial Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization
    Diaz, Juan Carlos
    Sauer, William H.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Marin, Jorge Eduardo
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Nino, Cesar Daniel
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Martinez, Juan Manuel
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Lopez-Cabanillas, Nestor
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Martin, David T.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 9 (08) : 1568 - 1581
  • [34] Left Bundle Branch Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy A Novel Approach
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (08) : 1076 - 1078
  • [35] Left bundle branch area pacing for heart failure patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy: A meta-analysis
    Jin, Chengyue
    Dai, Qiying
    Li, Pengyang
    Lam, Patrick
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (09) : 1933 - 1943
  • [36] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block Versus Right Ventricular Pacing
    Madias, John E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (08): : 1163 - 1163
  • [37] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Jiyi
    Sun, Fengzhi
    Wang, Zefeng
    Sun, Jiao
    Jiang, Xue
    Zhao, Weilong
    Zhang, Zhipeng
    Liu, Lu
    Zhang, Shulong
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [38] Comparative effects of left bundle branch area pacing, His bundle pacing, biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy: A network meta-analysis
    Hua, Juan
    Wang, Chenxi
    Kong, Qiling
    Zhang, Yichu
    Wang, Qijun
    Xiong, Ziyi
    Hu, Jinzhu
    Li, Juxiang
    Chen, Qi
    Hong, Kui
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (02) : 214 - 223
  • [39] Cardiac resynchronization therapy 2.0: Physiological pacing - His-Bundle- and Left-Bundle-Branch-Pacing
    Derndorfer, M.
    Martinek, M.
    Aichinger, J.
    Puererfellner, H.
    Kollias, G.
    JOURNAL FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2021, 28 (5-6): : 158 - 165
  • [40] His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing: Feasibility and safety
    Saleiro, Carolina
    Sousa, Pedro A.
    Nogueira, Catarina
    Mota, Lidia
    Almeida, Claudia
    Braganca, Gisela
    Paisana, Francisco
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 42 (08) : 683 - 691