Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:22
|
作者
Li, Yuqiu [1 ]
Yan, Lirong [1 ]
Dai, Yan [1 ]
Zhou, Yu'an [1 ]
Sun, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Ruohan [1 ]
Lin, Jinxuan [1 ]
Jin, Yuanhao [1 ]
Chen, Feng [1 ]
Guo, Xiaogang [1 ]
Chen, Keping [1 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis,Arrhythmia Ctr, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
来源
EUROPACE | 2020年 / 22卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Left bundle branch area pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy; Bundle branch block; ESC GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euaa271
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The present study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-indicated patients. Methods and results LBBAP was performed via transventricular septal approach in 25 patients as a rescue strategy in 5 patients with failed left ventricular (LV) lead placement and as a primary strategy in the remaining 20 patients. Pacing parameters, procedural characteristics, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were assessed at implantation and follow-up. Of 25 enrolled CRT-indicated patients, 14 had left bundle branch block (LBBB, 56.0%), 3 right bundle branch block (RBBB, 12.0%), 4 intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD, 16.0%), and 4 ventricular pacing dependence (16.0%). The QRS duration (QRSd) was significantly shortened by LBBAP (intrinsic 163.6 +/- 29.4 ms vs. LBBAP 123.0 +/- 10.8 ms, P < 0.001). During the mean follow-up of 9.1 months, New York Heart Association functional class was improved to 1.4 +/- 0.6 from baseline 2.6 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased to 46.9 +/- 10.2% from baseline 35.2 +/- 7.0% (P < 0.001), and LV end-diastolic dimensions (LVEDD) decreased to 56.8 +/- 9.7mm from baseline 64.1 +/- 9.9mm (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement (34.1 +/- 7.4% vs. 50.0 +/- 12.2%, P < 0.001) in LVEF in patients with LBBB. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the clinical feasibility of LBBAP in CRT-indicated patients. Left bundle branch area pacing generated narrow QRSd and led to reversal remodelling of LV with improvement in cardiac function. LBBAP may be an alternative to CRT in patients with failure of LV lead placement and a first-line option in selected patients such as those with LBBB and heart failure.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 60
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Zero fluoroscopy approach for cardiac resynchronization therapy using left bundle branch area pacing
    Ramos-Maqueda, Javier
    Alarcon, Francisco
    Cabrera-Ramos, Mercedes
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 65 (02) : 327 - 328
  • [22] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Huang, Weijian
    Wu, Shengjie
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Su, Lan
    Chen, Xueying
    Cai, Bingni
    Zou, Jiangang
    Lan, Rongfang
    Fu, Guosheng
    Mao, Guangyun
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Whinnett, Zachary, I
    Tung, Roderick
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (07) : 849 - 858
  • [23] Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients by using left bundle branch pacing
    Gu, Ying
    Li, Yanming
    Zhu, Ying
    Lin, Xiuyu
    Tian, Tian
    Zhang, Qigao
    Gong, Jianbin
    Wang, Lei
    Li, Jianhua
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [24] Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block
    Guo, Jincun
    Li, Linlin
    Xiao, Guosheng
    Ye, Tao
    Huang, Xinyi
    Meng, Fanqi
    Li, Qiang
    Chen, Simei
    Cai, Binni
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (12) : 1460 - 1468
  • [25] Electrophysiological Insights into Three Modalities of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Pacing Therapy
    Zhang, Jiefang
    Sheng, Xia
    Pan, Yiwen
    Wang, Min
    Fu, Guosheng
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 62 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [26] Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Biventricular Pacing in Candidates for Resynchronization Therapy
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Sharma, Parikshit S.
    Cano, Oscar
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Herweg, Bengt
    Zanon, Francesco
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    Zou, Jiangang
    Chelu, Mihail G.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Whinnett, Zachary I.
    Nair, Girish M.
    Molina-Lerma, Manuel
    Curila, Karol
    Zalavadia, Dipen
    Haseeb, Abdul
    Dye, Cicely
    Vipparthy, Sharath C.
    Brunetti, Ryan
    Moskal, Pawel
    Ross, Alexandra
    van Stipdonk, Antonius
    George, Jerin
    Qadeer, Yusuf K.
    Mumtaz, Mishal
    Kolominsky, Jeffrey
    Zahra, Syeda A.
    Golian, Mehrdad
    Marcantoni, Lina
    Subzposh, Faiz A.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (03) : 228 - 241
  • [27] Left bundle branch pacing set to outshine biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Batta, Akash
    Hatwal, Juniali
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 16 (04): : 186 - 190
  • [28] Left bundle branch pacing vs ventricular septal pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Chen, Jingjing
    Ezzeddine, Fatima M.
    Liu, Xiaoke
    Vaidya, Vaibhav
    McLeod, Christopher J.
    Valverde, Arturo M.
    Munoz, Freddy Del-Carpio
    Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
    Madhavan, Malini
    Killu, Ammar M.
    Mulpuru, Siva K.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2024, 5 (03): : 150 - 157
  • [29] Patient Selection for Biventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, His Bundle Pacing, and Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Sanders, David J.
    Krishnan, Kousik
    CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS, 2021, 15 (11)
  • [30] Patient Selection for Biventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, His Bundle Pacing, and Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    David J. Sanders
    Kousik Krishnan
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2021, 15