Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone-cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee

被引:82
|
作者
Fripp, Jurgen
Crozier, Stuart
Warfield, Simon K.
Ourselin, Sebastien
机构
[1] CSIRO ICT Ctr, BioMedIA Lab, Autonomous Syst Lab, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp Boston, Computat Radiol Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2007年 / 52卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/005
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The accurate segmentation of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance (MR) images of the knee is important for clinical studies and drug trials into conditions like osteoarthritis. Currently, segmentations are obtained using time-consuming manual or semi-automatic algorithms which have high inter- and intra-observer variabilities. This paper presents an important step towards obtaining automatic and accurate segmentations of the cartilages, namely an approach to automatically segment the bones and extract the bone cartilage interfaces (BCI) in the knee. The segmentation is performed using three-dimensional active shape models, which are initialized using an affine registration to an atlas. The BCI are then extracted using image information and prior knowledge about the likelihood of each point belonging to the interface. The accuracy and robustness of the approach was experimentally validated using an MR database of fat suppressed spoiled gradient recall images. The ( femur, tibia, patella) bone segmentation had a median Dice similarity coefficient of (0.96, 0.96, 0.89) and an average point-to-surface error of 0.16 mm on the BCI. The extracted BCI had a median surface overlap of 0.94 with the real interface, demonstrating its usefulness for subsequent cartilage segmentation or quantitative analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1617 / 1631
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Associations between KOOS (knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score) and bone-cartilage biomarkers
    Tamm, A. E.
    Lintrop, M.
    Hansen, Y.
    Kumm, J.
    Tamm, A. O.
    BONE, 2011, 48 : S261 - S261
  • [42] Automatic segmentation of thigh magnetic resonance images
    Urricelqui, Lorena
    Malanda, Armando
    Villanueva, Arantxa
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 58 : 531 - 537
  • [43] Automatic segmentation of thigh magnetic resonance images
    Urricelqui, Lorena
    Malanda, Armando
    Villanueva, Arantxa
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 34 : 979 - 985
  • [44] Automatic segmentation of thigh magnetic resonance images
    Urricelqui, Lorena
    Malanda, Armando
    Villanueva, Arantxa
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 34 : 531 - 537
  • [45] Automatic segmentation of thigh magnetic resonance images
    Urricelqui, Lorena
    Malanda, Armando
    Villanueva, Arantxa
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 58 : 979 - 985
  • [46] Automatic Bone Segmentation in Knee MR images using a Coarse-to-Fine Strategy
    Park, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Soochahn
    Yun, Il Dong
    Lee, Sang Uk
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 8314
  • [47] Bio-inspired zonal-structured matrices for bone-cartilage interface engineering
    Golebiowska, Aleksandra A.
    Nukavarapu, Syam P.
    BIOFABRICATION, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [48] Automatic Articular Cartilage Segmentation Based on Pattern Recognition from Knee MRI Images
    Jianfei Pang
    PengYue Li
    Mingguo Qiu
    Wei Chen
    Liang Qiao
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2015, 28 : 695 - 703
  • [49] AUTOMATIC MULTI-ATLAS-BASED CARTILAGE SEGMENTATION FROM KNEE MR IMAGES
    Shan, Liang
    Charles, Cecil
    Niethammer, Marc
    2012 9TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2012, : 1028 - 1031
  • [50] Automatic Articular Cartilage Segmentation Based on Pattern Recognition from Knee MRI Images
    Pang, Jianfei
    Li, PengYue
    Qiu, Mingguo
    Chen, Wei
    Qiao, Liang
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2015, 28 (06) : 695 - 703