Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: Should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

被引:110
|
作者
Kestin, LL
Goldstein, NS
Vicini, FA
Yan, D
Korman, HJ
Martinez, AA
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[2] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Pathol Anat, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[3] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Urol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy; prostatectomy; seminal vesicles;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03011-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated. Methods and Materials: A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved. Results: Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA < 10 ng/mL, Gleason less than or equal to 6, and clinical stage less than or equal to T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients. Conclusions: A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA 2:10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason greater than or equal to 7, or clinical T stage greater than or equal to T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 697
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the different cancer incidence in prostate and seminal vesicles
    Pannek, J
    Partin, AW
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2002, 33 (03) : 206 - 212
  • [32] Seminal Vesicle Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy
    Steed, Tanner
    Chopra, Nikki
    Yun, Jihyun
    Hill, Jordan
    Burke, Benjamin
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Warkentin, Brad
    Usmani, Nawaid
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (07) : 6587 - 6595
  • [33] SEMINAL VESICLE TREATMENT FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY
    Steed, Tanner
    Chopra, Nikki
    Yun, Jihyun
    Hill, Jordan
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Usmani, Nawaid
    Burke, Ben
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 174 : S55 - S55
  • [34] Impact of tumor invasion on seminal vesicles mobility in radiotherapy of T3b prostate cancer
    Buijs, M.
    Bergsma, L.
    De Vries, J.
    Kalisvaart, R.
    Pos, F.
    Heemsbergen, W.
    Remeijer, P.
    Van der Heide, U. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S39 - S40
  • [35] Variability of radiotherapy volume delineation: PSMA PET/MRI and MRI based clinical target volume and lymph node target volume for high-risk prostate cancer
    Lin-Lin Liu
    Lei-Lei Zhu
    Zhen-Guo Lu
    Jun-Die Sun
    Jun Zhao
    Hai-Feng Wang
    Zuo-Lin Xiang
    Cancer Imaging, 23
  • [36] Variability of radiotherapy volume delineation: PSMA PET/MRI and MRI based clinical target volume and lymph node target volume for high-risk prostate cancer
    Liu, Lin-Lin
    Zhu, Lei-Lei
    Lu, Zhen-Guo
    Sun, Jun-Die
    Zhao, Jun
    Wang, Hai-Feng
    Xiang, Zuo-Lin
    CANCER IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [37] Variation of clinical target volume definition among Japanese radiation oncologists in external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Shioyama, Yoshiyuki
    Tokumaru, Sunao
    Hayashi, Nobuyuki
    Oya, Natsuo
    Hiraki, Yoshiyuki
    Kusuhara, Kazuo
    Toita, Takafumi
    Suefuji, Hiroaki
    Hayabuchi, Naofumi
    Terashima, Hiromi
    Makino, Masaoki
    Jingu, Kenichi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 38 (04) : 275 - 280
  • [38] Radiotherapy for T3b prostate cancer (with seminal involvement) : clinical analyses
    Goupy, F.
    Le Prise, E.
    Williaume, D.
    Lafond, C.
    Simon, A.
    Perichon, N.
    Herve, C.
    Leproust, B.
    De Crevoisier, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S848 - S848
  • [39] Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy
    Deurloo, KEI
    Steenbakkers, RJHM
    Zijp, LJ
    de Bois, JA
    Nowak, PJCM
    Rasch, CRN
    van Herk, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (01): : 228 - 238
  • [40] Computerized Production of Statistical Clinical Target Volume Models in Prostate Cancer Radiation Treatment Planning
    Matsushita, N.
    Arimura, H.
    Nakamura, K.
    Kagami, Y.
    Shioyama, Y.
    Nakamura, Y.
    Honda, H.
    Hirata, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)