Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: Should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

被引:110
|
作者
Kestin, LL
Goldstein, NS
Vicini, FA
Yan, D
Korman, HJ
Martinez, AA
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[2] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Pathol Anat, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[3] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Urol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy; prostatectomy; seminal vesicles;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03011-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated. Methods and Materials: A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved. Results: Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA < 10 ng/mL, Gleason less than or equal to 6, and clinical stage less than or equal to T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients. Conclusions: A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA 2:10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason greater than or equal to 7, or clinical T stage greater than or equal to T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 697
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Assessment of the Planning Target Volume Margins for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer
    Cao, M.
    Qiao-Guan, G.
    Zhouhuizi, S.
    Steinberg, M. L.
    Nickols, N. G.
    Kupelian, P. A.
    King, C. R.
    Kishan, A. U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E758 - E759
  • [22] Clinical Assessment of Prostate Displacement and Planning Target Volume Margins for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer
    Levin-Epstein, Rebecca
    Qiao-Guan, George
    Juarez, Jesus E.
    Shen, Zhouhuizi
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Ruan, Dan
    Valle, Luca
    Nickols, Nicholas G.
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    King, Christopher R.
    Cao, Minsong
    Kishan, Amar U.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [23] A dose-volume histogram analysis of the seminal vesicles in men treated with conformal radiotherapy to 'prostate alone'
    Parker, C
    Haycocks, T
    Bayley, A
    Alasti, H
    Warde, P
    Catton, C
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 14 (04) : 298 - 302
  • [24] Intraductal spread of prostate cancer into the seminal vesicles
    Cundell, David S.
    Rowe, Edward
    Oxley, Jon
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 64 (07) : 1039 - 1041
  • [25] Automated Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer Involving Seminal Vesicles and Lymph Nodes
    Shen, Z. L.
    Stephans, K. L.
    Tendulkar, R. D.
    Bzdusek, K.
    Xia, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E607 - E607
  • [26] Equivalent 5 year bNED in select prostate cancer patients managed with surgery or radiation therapy despite exclusion of the seminal vesicles from the clinical target volume.
    DAmico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, C
    Schultz, D
    Malkowicz, SB
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Wein, A
    Coleman, CN
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 216 - 216
  • [27] Pathologic features of the prostate and seminal vesicles from eleven prostate cancer patients undergoing salvage surgery: high volume cancer with seminal vesicle involvement is common
    Krejci, KG
    Davis, BJ
    Sebo, TJ
    Leibovich, BC
    Zincke, H
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 75 : S35 - S35
  • [28] Dosimetric Advantages of Online Adaptive Replanning for Radiotherapy of the Prostate and Seminal Vesicles
    Holmes, S.
    Peng, C.
    Ahunbay, E.
    Lawton, C.
    Wang, D.
    Li, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [29] Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Including Seminal Vesicles in the Target Volume: A Treatment-planning Study Based on the HYPO-RT-PC Fractionation Schedule
    Wieslander, Elinore
    Johannesson, Vilberg
    Nilsson, Per
    Kjellen, Elisabeth
    Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 9 (07)
  • [30] Impact of the Target Volume (Prostate Alone vs. Prostate with Seminal Vesicles) and Fraction Dose (1.8 Gy vs. 2.0 Gy) on Quality of Life Changes After External- Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Pinkawa, Michael
    Piroth, Marc D.
    Fischedick, Karin
    Holy, Richard
    Klotz, Jens
    Nussen, Sandra
    Krenkel, Barbara
    Eble, Michael J.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2009, 185 (11) : 724 - 730